Literature DB >> 33925159

Prediction of Incident Cancers in the Lifelines Population-Based Cohort.

Francisco O Cortés-Ibañez1, Sunil Belur Nagaraj2, Ludo Cornelissen3, Gerjan J Navis4, Bert van der Vegt5, Grigory Sidorenkov1, Geertruida H de Bock1.   

Abstract

Cancer incidence is rising, and accurate prediction of incident cancers could be relevant to understanding and reducing cancer incidence. The aim of this study was to develop machine learning (ML) models that could predict an incident diagnosis of cancer. Participants without any history of cancer within the Lifelines population-based cohort were followed for a median of 7 years. Data were available for 116,188 cancer-free participants and 4232 incident cancer cases. At baseline, socioeconomic, lifestyle, and clinical variables were assessed. The main outcome was an incident cancer during follow-up (excluding skin cancer), based on linkage with the national pathology registry. The performance of three ML algorithms was evaluated using supervised binary classification to identify incident cancers among participants. Elastic net regularization and Gini index were used for variables selection. An overall area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) <0.75 was obtained, the highest AUC value was for prostate cancer (random forest AUC = 0.82 (95% CI 0.77-0.87), logistic regression AUC = 0.81 (95% CI 0.76-0.86), and support vector machines AUC = 0.83 (95% CI 0.78-0.88), respectively); age was the most important predictor in these models. Linear and non-linear ML algorithms including socioeconomic, lifestyle, and clinical variables produced a moderate predictive performance of incident cancers in the Lifelines cohort.

Entities:  

Keywords:  classification; health behavior; lifestyle; neoplasms; prediction; supervised machine learning

Year:  2021        PMID: 33925159     DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  40 in total

1.  2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values.

Authors:  Barbara E Ainsworth; William L Haskell; Stephen D Herrmann; Nathanael Meckes; David R Bassett; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Jennifer L Greer; Jesse Vezina; Melicia C Whitt-Glover; Arthur S Leon
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Cohort Profile: LifeLines, a three-generation cohort study and biobank.

Authors:  Salome Scholtens; Nynke Smidt; Morris A Swertz; Stephan J L Bakker; Aafje Dotinga; Judith M Vonk; Freerk van Dijk; Sander K R van Zon; Cisca Wijmenga; Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel; Ronald P Stolk
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 3.  SmokeHaz: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of the Effects of Smoking on Respiratory Health.

Authors:  Leah Jayes; Patricia L Haslam; Christina G Gratziou; Pippa Powell; John Britton; Constantine Vardavas; Carlos Jimenez-Ruiz; Jo Leonardi-Bee
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and prognosis: Opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Shigao Huang; Jie Yang; Simon Fong; Qi Zhao
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 8.679

5.  Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Karel G M Moons; Douglas G Altman; Johannes B Reitsma; John P A Ioannidis; Petra Macaskill; Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew J Vickers; David F Ransohoff; Gary S Collins
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Cancer incidence in the United Kingdom: projections to the year 2030.

Authors:  M Mistry; D M Parkin; A S Ahmad; P Sasieni
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Alcohol consumption and site-specific cancer risk: a comprehensive dose-response meta-analysis.

Authors:  V Bagnardi; M Rota; E Botteri; I Tramacere; F Islami; V Fedirko; L Scotti; M Jenab; F Turati; E Pasquali; C Pelucchi; C Galeone; R Bellocco; E Negri; G Corrao; P Boffetta; C La Vecchia
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  Review of non-clinical risk models to aid prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  Kawthar Al-Ajmi; Artitaya Lophatananon; Martin Yuille; William Ollier; Kenneth R Muir
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Performance comparison of linear and non-linear feature selection methods for the analysis of large survey datasets.

Authors:  Olga Krakovska; Gregory Christie; Andrew Sixsmith; Martin Ester; Sylvain Moreno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Representativeness of the LifeLines Cohort Study.

Authors:  Bart Klijs; Salome Scholtens; Jornt J Mandemakers; Harold Snieder; Ronald P Stolk; Nynke Smidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  How aging of the global population is changing oncology.

Authors:  Yan Fei Gu; Frank P Lin; Richard J Epstein
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2021-12-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.