Literature DB >> 23904578

Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws.

Sebastian B M Patzelt1, Sebastian Vonau, Susanne Stampf, Wael Att.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs) in producing single-unit scans and the possibility of generating complete dentures digitally, little is known about their feasibility and accuracy in digitizing edentulous jaws. The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaw models with IOSs.
METHODS: The authors used an industrial laser scanner (reference scanner) and four IOSs to digitize two representative edentulous jaw models. They loaded the data sets obtained into three-dimensional evaluation software, superimposed the data sets and compared them for accuracy. The authors used a one-way analysis of variance to compute differences within groups (precision), as well as to compare values with those of the reference scanner (trueness) (statistical significance, P < .05).
RESULTS: Mean trueness values ranged from 44.1 to 591.8 micrometers. Data analysis yielded statistically significant differences in trueness between all scanners (P < .05). Mean precision values ranged from 21.6 to 698.0 μm. The study results showed statistically significant differences in precision between all scanners (P < .05), except for the CEREC AC Bluecam (Sirona, Bensheim, Germany) and the Zfx IntraScan (manufactured by MHT Italy, Negrar, Italy/ MHT Optic Research, Niederhasli, Switzerland; distributed by Zfx, Dachau, Germany) (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Digitizing edentulous jaw models with the use of IOSs appears to be feasible, although the accuracy of the scanners differs significantly. The results of this study showed that only one scanner was sufficiently accurate to warrant further intraoral investigations. Further enhancements are necessary to recommend these IOSs for this particular indication. Practical Implications. On the basis of the results of this study, the authors cannot recommend these four IOSs for digitization of edentulous jaws in vivo.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intraoral scanner; accuracy; digital impression; edentulous jaws; precision; trueness

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23904578     DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  30 in total

1.  [Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws].

Authors:  Y Cao; J K Chen; K H Deng; Y Wang; Y C Sun; Y J Zhao
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-02-18

Review 2.  Clinical application and research progress of digital complete denture.

Authors:  Yong-Sheng Zhou; Yu-Chun Sun; Yong Wang
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2021-02-01

3.  In Vitro Comparison of Three Intraoral Scanners for Implant-Supported Dental Prostheses.

Authors:  Vitória Costa; António Sérgio Silva; Rosana Costa; Pedro Barreiros; Joana Mendes; José Manuel Mendes
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15

4.  Effect of Scanner Type and Scan Body Location on the Accuracy of Mandibular Complete-Arch Digital Implant Scans: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Gülce Çakmak; Hakan Yilmaz; Alejandro Treviño Santos; Ali Murat Kökat; Burak Yilmaz
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 3.485

5.  Accuracy of Three-Dimensional (3D) Printed Dental Digital Models Generated with Three Types of Resin Polymers by Extra-Oral Optical Scanning.

Authors:  Eugen S Bud; Vlad I Bocanet; Mircea H Muntean; Alexandru Vlasa; Sorana M Bucur; Mariana Păcurar; Bogdan R Dragomir; Cristian D Olteanu; Anamaria Bud
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Kyung-Jin Suh; Kyung-Min Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.

Authors:  Ning Gan; Yaoyang Xiong; Ting Jiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparative analysis on reproducibility among 5 intraoral scanners: sectional analysis according to restoration type and preparation outline form.

Authors:  Ji-Man Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  Total CAD/CAM Supported Method for Manufacturing Removable Complete Dentures.

Authors:  Arthur Furtado de Mendonça; Mario Furtado de Mendonça; George Shelby White; Georges Sara; Darren Littlefair
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2016-11-16

10.  Trueness and Precision of Four Intraoral Scanners in Oral Implantology: A Comparative in Vitro Study.

Authors:  Francesco G Mangano; Giovanni Veronesi; Uli Hauschild; Eitan Mijiritsky; Carlo Mangano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.