| Literature DB >> 33924397 |
Rosana A Gonçalves1, Rosimara P Toledo1, Nirav Joshi2, Olivia M Berengue1.
Abstract
Over the last two decades, oxide nanostructures have been continuously evaluated and used in many technological applications. The advancement of the controlled synthesis approach to design desired morphology is a fundamental key to the discipline of material science and nanotechnology. These nanostructures can be prepared via different physical and chemical methods; however, a green and ecofriendly synthesis approach is a promising way to produce these nanostructures with desired properties with less risk of hazardous chemicals. In this regard, ZnO and TiO2 nanostructures are prominent candidates for various applications. Moreover, they are more efficient, non-toxic, and cost-effective. This review mainly focuses on the recent state-of-the-art advancements in the green synthesis approach for ZnO and TiO2 nanostructures and their applications. The first section summarizes the green synthesis approach to synthesize ZnO and TiO2 nanostructures via different routes such as solvothermal, hydrothermal, co-precipitation, and sol-gel using biological systems that are based on the principles of green chemistry. The second section demonstrates the application of ZnO and TiO2 nanostructures. The review also discusses the problems and future perspectives of green synthesis methods and the related issues posed and overlooked by the scientific community on the green approach to nanostructure oxides.Entities:
Keywords: TiO2; ZnO; green synthesis; industrial applications; metal oxide nanostructures
Year: 2021 PMID: 33924397 PMCID: PMC8068979 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26082236
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Schematic illustration of green synthesis approach of ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) and their application. The number of publications on green synthesis of ZnO and TiO2 NPs from 2010 to 2020 (internet search of Scopus on 10 March 2021). Keywords searched: ZnO + Green Synthesis and TiO2 + Green Synthesis.
Classification of five different types of “gels” essential to a material’s sol-gel synthesis [35].
| Type of Gel | Bonding | Source | Gel Schematic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colloidal | Particles connected by Van der Waals or hydrogen bonding | Metal oxides or hydroxide sols |
|
| Metal-oxane polymer | Inorganic polymers connected via covalent or intermolecular bonding | Hydrolysis or condensation of metal alkoxides, e.g., SiO2 from tetramethyl orthosilicate |
|
| Metal complex | Weakly interconnected metal complexes | Concentrated metal complex solution, e.g., aqueous metal citrate or ethanolic metal urea often form resins or glassy solids rather than gels |
|
| Polymer complex I in situ polymerizable complex (“Pechini” method) | Organic polymers interconnected by covalent or coordinate bonding | Polyesterification between polyhydroxy alcohol (e.g., ethylene glycol) and carboxylic acid with metal complex (e.g., metal-citrate) |
|
| Polymer complex II coordinating and crosslinking polymers | Organic polymers interconnected by coordinate and intermolecular bonding | Coordinating polymer (e.g., alginate) and metal salt solution (typically aqueous) |
|
Figure 2(a) Schematic of the green sol-gel synthesis of ZnO NPs. (b) Chemical mechanism of the ZnO NPs’ formation. As synthesized and annealed ZnO samples at temperatures of 300–900 °C. (c) X-ray diffraction pattern. (d) FTIR Plot. (e) Thermogravimetric spectra. Figure adapted with permission from Reference [36]. Copyright 2020 RSC.
Figure 3(a) X-ray diffraction pattern of the ZnO NPs. (b,c) Scanning electron microscopy images of agglomerated ZnO NPs. (d) UV–Vis spectra of the Congo red (CR) dye versus time. (e) The FTIR spectra of the ZnO NPs, CR dye, and CR–loaded ZnO NPs. (f) Transmission electron microscopy of the ZnO NPs at a 100 nm scale. Figure adapted with permission from Reference [39]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
Figure 4(a) XRD plot of synthesized ZnO NPs at different calcinations at 600 °C. (b) The UV-Vis spectra of the ZnO NPs synthesized at 600 °C. (c,d) TEM image and particle size distribution of ZnO NPs in gum tragacanth (GT) media synthesized at 600 °C. Figure adapted with permission from Reference [41] Copyright 2013 Elsevier.
Biosynthesis approaches to synthesize ZnO NPs from different plant sources.
| Morphology/Shape | Plant Source | Zinc Precursor | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quasi-spherical |
| Zinc nitrate hexahydrate | [ |
| Hexagonal | Zinc nitrate hexahydrate | [ | |
| Spherical |
| Zinc nitrate solution | [ |
| Spherical, oval, and hexagonal |
| ZnSO4 | [ |
| Not Reported |
| Zinc nitrate, sodium hydroxide | [ |
| Hexagonal |
| Zinc acetate dehydrate | [ |
| Hexagonal |
| Zinc nitrate hexahydrate | [ |
| Spherical |
| Zinc nitrate hexahydrate | [ |
| Spherical |
| ZnNO3, ZnCl2, and Zn-ammonium hydrate | [ |
| Spherical |
| Zinc nitrate hexahydrate | [ |
| Various morphologies |
| Zinc nitrate hexahydrate | [ |
| Rod-shaped |
| Zinc acetate dehydrate | [ |
| Spherical |
| Zinc nitrate solution | [ |
| Spherical and granular |
| Zinc acetate dehydrate | [ |
| Hexagonal |
| Zinc nitrate hexahydrate | [ |
| Nano-flowers |
| Zinc nitrate | [ |
| Hexagonal |
| Zinc nitrate solution | [ |
| Flower-shaped NPs |
| Zinc nitrate hexahydrate | [ |
| Spherical |
| Zinc nitrate hexahydrate | [ |
| Spherical |
| Zinc acetate dehydrate | [ |
| Pyramid-like |
| Zinc acetate dehydrate | [ |
| Hexagonal |
| Zinc acetate dehydrate | [ |
| Polyhedron |
| Zinc nitrate solution | [ |
| NPs | Zinc chloride | [ | |
| NPs |
| Zinc gluconate hydrate | [ |
| Spherical and hexagonal |
| Zinc acetate dehydrate | [ |
| Spherical | Zinc nitrate solution | [ | |
| NR |
| Zinc acetate dehydrate | [ |
| Needle-like |
| Zinc nitrate hexahydrate | [ |
| Spherical | Zinc nitrate hexahydrate | [ | |
| Hexagonal | Zinc nitrate hexahydrate | [ | |
| Spherical |
| Zinc nitrate solution | [ |
| Spherical and hexagonal | Zinc nitrate solution | [ | |
| Spherical |
| Zinc nitrate solution | [ |
| Triangular | Zinc contaminated soil | [ | |
| Spherical and hexagonal |
| Zinc nitrate solution | [ |
| Rod-shaped |
| Zinc nitrate hexahydrate | [ |
| Spherical |
| Zinc nitrate hexahydrate | [ |
| Spherical |
| Zinc nitrate hexahydrate | [ |
| Spherical |
| Zinc nitrate solution | [ |
| Columnar |
| ZnSO4 | [ |
| Hexagonal |
| Zinc nitrate solution | [ |
| Spherical |
| Zinc nitrate hexahydrate | [ |
| Spherical |
| Zinc oxide powder | [ |
| Not Reported |
| ZnO powder | [ |
| Spherical |
| Zinc nitrate hexahydrate | [ |
| Spherical | Zinc nitrate hexahydrate | [ |
Figure 5(a,b) Scanning electron microscopy images of the Platanus acerifolia seed fibers, (c,d) titanium sol-impregnated fibers (TIF), (e) titanium fiber hybrid (TFH), (f–i) hollow tubular TiO2 microtubes, and (j) an inner wall of the TiO2 microtubes. (k) Schematic of the double soaking sol-gel route for the preparation of TiO2 microtubes. (l) The XRD pattern of the TiO2 microtubes (a,b) their inner wall. (m) The FTIR spectra of the natural SFs (a) and TIF (b), TFH (c), and TiO2 microtubes (d) prepared from the natural SFs. (n) The BET surface is a pore-size distribution of the TiO2 microtubes. (o) UV-Vis spectra of the commercially available TiO2 (a) and synthesized TiO2 microtubes (b). Figure adapted with permission from Reference [89]. Copyright 2017 Elsevier.
Green sol-gel synthesis approach for the preparation of TiO2 nanostructures.
| Material | Green Synthesis | Reactant | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2 | Titanium tetraisopropoxide, isopropanol, acetic acid, and ethanol | [ | |
| TiO2 | Titanic acid and water | [ | |
| TiO2 |
| Titanium (IV)-isopropoxide, ammonia, glacial acetic acid, and ethanol | [ |
| TiO2 | TiCl4, ammonia | [ | |
| TiO2 |
| Titanium tetraisopropoxide(TTIP), 2-propanol, nitric acid | [ |
| TiO2 |
| Isopropanol, titanium tetraisopropoxide, acetic acid (2%) | [ |
| TiO2 |
| Titanium isopropoxide, isopropanol | [ |
Figure 6Schematic diagram showing all steps involved in a generic green synthesis mediated by plant extract using the co-precipitation method.
Figure 7FESEM micrographs of TiO2 NPs synthesized using (a) uncalcined TiO2; (b) 0.01 mol titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP), pH 5; (c) 0.01 mol TTIP, pH 7; (d) 0.01 mol TTIP, pH 9, insert: HRTEM image; (e) 0.07 mol of TTIP in pH 9; (f) pore channels of TiO2 NPs. Figure adapted with permission from Reference [110]. Copyright 2017 RSC.
Green co-precipitation syntheses of ZnO nanostructures mediated by plant extract.
| Morphology | Zinc Precursor | Plant/Part Used | Role of Biocomponents | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spherical NPs | Zinc acetate dihydrate | Reducing and stabilizing agent | [ | |
| Flower-like structures | Zinc acetate dehydrate | Reducing and capping agent | [ | |
| Quasi-spherical NPs | Hydrated zinc nitrate | Oxidizing/reducing chemical agent | [ | |
| Spherical NPs | Zinc nitrate hexahydrate | Capping and chelating agents | [ | |
| Spherical NPs | Zinc acetate dihydrate | Capping and reducing agent | [ | |
| Spherical NPs | Zinc nitrate hexahydrate | Natural ligation agent | [ | |
| Nanoflowers | Zinc chloride | Reduction agent | [ | |
| Flower-like structure | Zinc acetate |
| Reducing and capping agent | [ |
| Rod-like and spherical NPs | Zinc nitrate | Reducing agent | [ | |
| Flower-like structure, cauliflower-like, and nanoflowers | Zinc nitrate hexahydrate |
| Capping agent | [ |
| Flower-like nanostructures | Zinc acetate | Reducing agent | [ | |
| Spherical NPs | Hydrated zinc chloride | Capping agent | [ | |
| Nanoflowers | Zinc acetate |
| Reducing agent | [ |
| Tetrameric structured NPs | Zinc nitrate hexahydrate |
| Reducing and stabilizing agent | [ |
| Hexagonal NPs | Zinc nitrate tetrahydrate | Reducing agent | [ | |
| Leaf-like nanostructures | Zinc nitrate |
| Reducing and capping agent | [ |
Figure 8(a) Precursors (zinc acetate, hexamethylenetetramine (HMT), and sodium hydroxide) used in the synthesis of different nZnO morphologies; auto-clave treatment at 90 °C was maintained for (b) 6 h to get nanoplatelets, (c) 12 h to achieve multibranched flower-like particles, and (d) 24 h to obtain nanorods. (e) Diagram of the antimicrobial activity test for the ZnO multibranched flower-like particles. Figure adapted with permission from Reference [129]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
Figure 9SEM images for ZnO (a) and Zn0.85Al0.15O (b) and TEM for ZnO (c) and Zn0.85Al0.15O (d). Figure adapted with permission from Reference [160]. Copyright 2020 RSC.
Figure 10(a) TEM and (b) HRTEM image of the as-synthesized catalysts. (c) the fast Fourier transition (FFT) image of the selected area, and (d) inverse fast Fourier transition (IFFT) image obtained from (c). Figure adapted with permission from Reference [164]. Copyright 2010 Elsevier.
Figure 11Micrograph of sunflower pollen (a), ZrO2-doped TiO2 spinous hollow sample before calcination (b), 4.6% doped TiO2 sample (c), 8.8% doped TiO2 sample (d), 12.6% doped TiO2 sample (e), 18.2% doped TiO2 sample (f), calcinated sample presented in a smaller size due to the removal of the pollen template (g), hollow microsphere (h), and TiO2 samples synthesized without templates (i). Figure adapted with permission from [167] Copyright 2018 Elsevier.
Parameters involved in the process of dye photodegradation by TiO2 and ZnO nanostructures synthesized by green routes. The dyes methylene blue, rhodamine B, malachite green, methyl orange, Congo red and crystal violet are indicated by the abbreviations MB, RhB, MG, MO, CR and CV, respectively.
| Morphology/Material Phase | Green Synthesis Method | Radiation | Dye | Dye Concentration | Catalyst Concentration | pH | Exposure Time (min) | Efficiency (%) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanorods/TiO2 anatase | Microwave | Artificial sunlight | RhB | 10−5 M (50 mL) | 50 mg/10 mL | dye pH | 120 | >98% | [ |
| Spherical NPs/TiO2 anatase | Co-precipitation * | Solar light | Coralline red | 5 mg/100 mL | 10 mg/100 mL | 8 | 140 | 92.17% | [ |
| Meso/macro-porous nanostructures | Precipitation * | Sunlight | MB | 20 mg/L | - | dye pH | 135 | >95% | [ |
| Spherical NPs/TiO2 anatase | Continuous ultrasonic stimulation | UV light | MB | 10 ppm | 1 g/L | dye pH | 150 | 92.5% | [ |
| Elliptical NPs/TiO2 anatase | Sol-gel * | Visible light | MB, fuchsine, CV, and Rhodamine 6G | 10 mg/L (100 mL) | 0.1 g | dye pH | 180 | 88–99% | [ |
| Dandelion-like structures/TiO2 anatase-rutile | Hydrothermal | UV light | MB | 10 mg/L (40 mL) | 20 mg–40 mL | dye pH | 650 | >97% | [ |
| Spherical NPs/TiO2 rutile | Microwave * | Sunlight | MB, MO, CV, and alizarin red | 1 mg/100 mL | 10 mg/50 mL | dye pH | 360 | 77.3–92.5% | [ |
| Spherical NPs/TiO2 anatase | Co-precipitation * | UV light | Reactive Green-19 | 6.7 mM | 0.030 g/100 mL | 3.5, 10.5 | 120 | 98.88% | [ |
| Non-spherical NPs/TiO2 anatase | Sol-gel | UV light | MO | 20 ppm (100 mL) | 0.1 g | dye pH | 150 | 94% | [ |
| Spherical structures/TiO2 anatase | Precipitation | Sunlight | MB | 6–40 ppm (200 mL) | 0.05–0.40 g | dye pH | 120 | 100% | [ |
| Nanoflowers/ZnO wurtzite | Co-precipitation * | UV light | MB, MG, CR, and Eosin Y | 15 mg/L | 5 mg/L | dye pH | 90 | 100% | [ |
| Spherical and hexagonal prismatic NPs and nanosheets/ZnO wurtzite | Co-precipitation | Visible light | RhB | 5 × 10−6 M (2 mL) | 1 mg/2 mL | dye pH | 120 | 75–84% | [ |
| Leaf-like structures/ZnO wurtzite | Co-precipitation * | Dark condition | MG | 10 mg/L (90 mL) | 5 mg/90 mL | dye pH | 240 | ~80% | [ |
| Hollow microspheres/ZnO wurtzite | Hydrothermal * | UV light | MG | 10 mg/L (200 mL) | 1 g/L | 5 | 60 | ~90% | [ |
| Nanosheets/ZnO wurtzite | Hydrothermal | UV light | MB | 1 × 10−5 M (200 mL) | 0.05 g/200 mL | dye pH | 50 | 99.2% | [ |
| Flower-like nanostructures/ZnO wurtzite | Co-precipitation * | UV light | MB | 50 µM | 0.5–1.0 g/ml | dye pH | 30 | 97.5% | [ |
| Quasi-hexagonal NPs/ZnO wurtzite | Microwave * | UV light | MB | 5 mg/L (100 mL) | 30 mg (100 mL) | 3–11 | 40 | 70–100% | [ |
| Spherical NPs/ZnO wurtzite | Mechanically assisted metathesis reaction | UV light | MB | 10 mg/L (100 mL) | 10 mg/100 mL | dye pH | 120 | 78% | [ |
| Hollow nanospheres/ZnO wurtzite | Hydrothermal | UV and visible light | CR | 20 ppm (50 mL) | 25 mg/50 mL | 5–9 | 90 | 99% | [ |
| Spongy cave-like structures/ZnO wurtzite | Solution combustion * | UV and sun light | MB | 5 ppm (100 mL) | 50 mg/100 mL | 2–12 | 90 | ~18–100% | [ |
| Mysorepak-like, canine teeth, hollow pyramid, and aggregated hexagonal/ZnO wurtzite | Combustion * | UV light | MB | 5–20 ppm (100 mL) | 50–200 mg/100 mL | 2–12 | 150 | 85–100% | [ |
| Quasi-spherical NPs/ZnO wurtzite | Co-precipitation * | Sunlight | MB | 1 × 10−5 M (100 mL) | 100 mg/100 mL | dye pH | 90 | 100% | [ |
| Spherical NPs/ZnO wurtzite | Sol-gel | Visible light | Direct blue 129 | 20 mg/L (50 mL) | 30–60 mg/50 mL | dye pH | 105 | ~60–95% | [ |
| Spherical NPs/ZnO wurtzite | Hydrothermal * | UV light | MB and MO | 10 mg/L (50 mL) | 1–30 mg/50 mL | dye pH | 50–60 | 96.6–98.2% | [ |
| Spherical and rod-like NPs/ZnO wurtzite | Co-precipitation * | Visible light | RhB | 10 mg/L | 1 g | dye pH | 180 | 88–92% | [ |
| Sponge-like structures/ZnO wurtzite | Combustion * | UV and sun light | MB and MG | 5–25 ppm (100 mL) | 50–200 mg/100 mL | 2–12 | 120–150 | ~10–100% | [ |
| NPs/ZnO wurtzite | Combustion * | UV light | Rose Bengal | 2–40 ppm (250 mL) | 20–80 mg/250 mL | 6–10 | 90 | ~70–90% | [ |
| Porous NPs/ZnO wurtzite | Solution combustion * | UV e sun light | MB | 5–20 ppm (100 mL) | 50–200 mg/100 mL | 2–12 | 120 | ~3–99% | [ |
| Spherical NPs/ZnO wurtzite | Combustion * | UV light | CR | 10–40 ppm (250 mL) | 20–80 mg/250 mL | 6–10 | 60 | 70–90% | [ |
| Hexagonal NPs/ZnO wurtzite | Solution combustion * | UV and sun light | MB | 5–20 ppm (100 mL) | 100 mg/100 mL | 3–12 | 40–50 | 90–100% | [ |
| Nanoflowers/ZnO wurtzite | Co-precipitation * | Sunlight | RhB | 10 µM (100 mL) | 20 mg/100 mL | dye pH | 200 | 98% | [ |
| Sphere-like nanostructures | Co-precipitation * | UV light | MB | 50 µM | 50 mg | dye pH | 210 | 98.6% | [ |
| Spherical NPs/ZnO wurtzite | Hydrothermal * | UV light | MB and MO | 10 mg/L (50mL) | 5–30 mg/50 mL | dye pH | 50 | 96.6–98.2% | [ |
| Spherical NPs/ZnO wurtzite | Sol-gel * | UV light | MB, MO, and Methyl red | 5–25 ppm (50 mL) | 50 mg/50 mL | dye pH | 35 | 60–100% | [ |
| Spherical morphology/ZnO wurtzite | Solvothermal * | Visible light | MB | 20 mg/L (100 mL) | 100 mg/100 mL | 4.0–9.8 | 30 | 7.6–96.8% | [ |
| Nanoflowers/ZnO wurtzite | Co-precipitation | Sunlight | Indigo carmine | - | 50 mg | dye pH | 120 | 83% | [ |
| Quasi-spherical NPs/ZnO wurtzite | Combustion * | UV light | MB | 5 × 10−5 M (30 mL) | 20 mg/30 mL | 5–12 | 120 | 40–96% | [ |
| Plates, bullets, flower, prismatic tip, and closed pinecone nanostructures/ZnO wurtzite | Solution combustion * | UV and sun light | MB | 10 ppm (250 mL) | 60 mg/250 mL | dye pH | 60 | 85–92% | [ |
The * in the second column indicates that the green syntheses were aided by plant extracts.