| Literature DB >> 33924245 |
Keren Constantini1, Irit Markus1, Naomi Epel2, Ronit Jakobovich2, Yftach Gepner1, Shahar Lev-Ari2.
Abstract
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has forced adolescents to adapt rapidly to a new reality of physical and social distancing, while introducing a range of new sources of stress and adversity. Our primary aim was to study the relationship between adolescents' resilience and their participation in online sports programs during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown period. Our secondary aims were to assess the associations between the organized sports programs' determinants and resilience.Entities:
Keywords: adolescents; online programs; participation in physical activity; resilience; wellbeing
Year: 2021 PMID: 33924245 PMCID: PMC8074771 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18084386
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Characteristics of the 473 adolescents who took part in the study, grouped by participation in online group meetings of organized sports programs during the COVID-19 lockdown.
| All | Did Not Participate | Participated | Diff between Groups | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 17.4 ± 0.8 | 17.3 ± 0.8 | 17.4 ± 0.8 | Ns |
|
| χ2(1) = 14.86 | |||
|
| 302 (63.8%) | 71 (50.7%) | 231 (69.4%) | |
|
| 171 (31.2%) | 69 (49.3%) | 102 (30.6%) | |
|
| NS | |||
|
| 71 | 50 | 21 | |
|
| 169 | 55 | 114 | |
|
| 202 | 60 | 142 | |
|
| 31 | 4 | 32 | |
|
| NS | |||
|
| 2 (0.4%) | 1 (0.7%) | 1 (0.3%) | |
|
| 12 (2.5%) | 2 (1.4%) | 10 (3.0%) | |
|
| 86 (18.2%) | 27 (19.3%) | 59 (17.8%) | |
|
| 217 (46.0%) | 72 (51.4%) | 145 (43.7%) | |
|
| 155 (32.8%) | 38 (27.1%) | 117 (35.2%) | |
|
| 441 (93.2%) | 127 (90.7%) | 314 (94.3%) | NS |
|
| NS | |||
|
| 376 (79.5%) | 110 (78.6%) | 266 (79.9%) | |
|
| 85 (18.0%) | 27 (19.3%) | 58 (17.4%) | |
|
| 12 (2.5%) | 3 (2.1%) | 9 (2.7%) | |
Abbreviations: NS, not significanct; * p-value of < 0.05 indicating statistical significance.
Resilience, lifestyle, psychosocial and sports programs determinants of 473 adolescents during the COVID-19 lockdown grouped by participation in organized sports programs.
| ALL | Did Not Participate | Participated | Difference between Groups | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 30.5 ± 5.6 | 29.3 ± 6.1 | 31.0 ± 5.3 | T = 2.84 |
|
| 227.3 ± 118.0 | 191.1 ± 145 | 242.5 ± 101.03 | T = 4.41 |
|
| 8.2 ± 1.1 | 8.1 ± 1.2 | 8.3 ± 1.1 | Ns |
|
| χ2 = 14.89 | |||
|
| 29 (6.1%) | 9 (6.4%) | 20 (6.0%) | |
|
| 26 (5.5%) | 14 (10%) | 12 (3.6%) | |
|
| 60 (12.7%) | 18 (12.9%) | 42 (12.7%) | |
|
| 70 (14.8%) | 18 (12.9%) | 52 (15.7%) | |
|
| 288 (60.8%) | 82 (57.9%) | 206 (62.0%) | |
|
| 6.9 ± 1.5 | 6.6 ± 1.7 | 7.0 ± 1.4 | T = 2.43 |
|
| 24.0 ± 5.3 | 23.4 ± 5.4 | 24.3 ± 5.2 | NS |
|
| ||||
|
| 3 (0.6%) | 1 (0.7%) | 2 (0.6%) | |
|
| 12 (2.5%) | 2 (1.4%) | 10 (3%) | |
|
| 110 (23.3%) | 47 (33.6%) | 63 (18.9%) | |
|
| 348 (73.6%) | 90 (64.3%) | 258 (77.5%) | |
|
| ||||
|
| 6 (1.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 6 (1.8%) | |
|
| 10 (2.1%) | 2 (1.4%) | 8 (2.4%) | |
|
| 57 (12.1%) | 12 (8.6%) | 45 (13.5%) | |
|
| 400 (84.6%) | 126 (90.0%) | 274 (82.3%) | |
|
| NS | |||
|
| 234 (49.5%) | 73 (52.1%) | 161 (48.3%) | |
|
| 180 (38.1%) | 52 (37.1%) | 128 (38.4%) | |
|
| 44 (9.3%) | 9 (6.4%) | 35 (10.5%) | |
|
| 15 (3.2%) | 4 (3.4%) | 9 (2.7%) | |
|
| ||||
|
| 7 (1.5%) | 1 (0.8%) | 6 (1.8%) | |
|
| 21 (4.4%) | 4 (3.4%) | 14 (4.2%) | |
|
| 138 (29.2%) | 40 (33.9%) | 93 (27.9%) | |
|
| 223 (47.1%) | 60 (50.8%) | 151 (45.3%) | |
|
| 84 (17.8%) | 13 (11.0%) | 69 (20.7%) | |
|
| ||||
|
| 1 (0.2%) | 1 (0.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
|
| 18 (3.8%) | 4 (2.9%) | 14 (4.2%) | |
|
| 65 (13.7%) | 29 (20.7%) | 36 (10.8%) | |
|
| 197 (41.6%) | 55 (39.3%) | 142 (42.6%) | |
|
| 192 (40.6%) | 51 (36.4%) | 141 (42.3%) | |
Abbreviations: NS, not significanct; * p-value of < 0.05 indicating statistical significance.
Assessment of how meaningful the sports program determinants are to adolescents during the COVID-19 lockdown grouped by participation in organized sports programs.
| Program Determinant | ALL | Did Not Participate | Participated | Difference between Groups |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content of physical exercise | 3.3 ± 1.2 | 2.2 ± 1.6 | 3.7 ± 0.6 | |
| Session initiation and closure discussions | 2.6 ± 1.4 | 1.3 ± 1.3 | 3.0 ± 2.6 | |
| Relationships with friends in the group | 3.2 ± 1.1 | 2.5 ± 1.6 | 3.5 ± 0.7 | |
| Relationship with coach | 3.1 ± 1.2 | 2.3 ± 1.6 | 3.4 ± 0.8 | |
| Program special events | 3.0 ± 1.3 | 2.0 ± 1.7 | 3.4 ± 0.9 |
Correlations between organized sports program components: content of physical exercise, session initiation and session closure discussions, relationships with friends in the group, relationship with the coach, and program special events.
| Program Determinant | Content of Physical Exercise | Session Initiation | Relationships with Friends in the Group | Relationship with Coach | Program Special Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content of physical exercise | 1 | ||||
| Session initiation and closure discussions | 0.442 ** | 1 | |||
| Relationships with friends in the group | 0.291 ** | 0.287 ** | 1 | ||
| Relationship with coach | 0.373 ** | 0.451 ** | 0.535 ** | 1 | |
| Program special events | 0.344 ** | 0.455 ** | 0.461 ** | 0.461 ** | 1 |
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Multiple regression analysis program components (physical activity, relationship with coach) and participant characteristics (age, gender, socioeconomic status) associated with resilience (primary outcome).
| β Coefficient | ||
|---|---|---|
| Age | 1.141 | 0.001 * |
| Gender | 2.853 | <0.001 * |
| Socioeconomic status | 1.249 | 0.029 * |
| Physical activity | 0.008 | <0.001 * |
| Relationship with coach | 2.060 | <0.001 * |
Abbreviations: β Coefficient; Beta coefficient; * p-value of < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Note: sports online program determinants that did not enter the regression equation: content of physical exercise, session initiation and session closure discussions, relationships with friends in the group, and program special events.