Hongyan Guan1, Anthony D Okely2, Nicolas Aguilar-Farias3, Borja Del Pozo Cruz4, Catherine E Draper5, Asmaa El Hamdouchi6, Alex A Florindo7, Alejandra Jáuregui8, Peter T Katzmarzyk9, Anna Kontsevaya10, Marie Löf11, Wonsoon Park12, John J Reilly13, Deepika Sharma14, Mark S Tremblay15, Sanne L C Veldman16. 1. Department of Integrated Early Childhood Development, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China. 2. Early Start and Illawarra Health & Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: tokely@uow.edu.au. 3. Department of Physical Education, Sports and Recreation, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile. 4. Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, NSW, Australia. 5. South African Medical Research Council and Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. 6. Unité Mixte de Recherche en Nutrition et Alimentation CNESTEN-Ibn Tofail University (URAC39), Regional Designated Center of Nutrition Associated with AFRA/IAEA, Rabat, Morocco. 7. School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 8. Department of Physical Activity and Healthy Lifestyles, Center for Nutrition and Health Research, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico. 9. Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA. 10. National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Moscow, Russia. 11. Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. 12. Korea Institute of Child Care and Education, Seoul, South Korea. 13. School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK. 14. Nutrition Programme Division, UNICEF, New York, NY, USA. 15. CHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 16. Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Global movement behaviour guidelines recommend that preschool children (aged 3–4 years) accumulate at least 180 min physical activity, engage in no more than 1 h sedentary screen time, and have 10–13 h good-quality sleep per day. For school-age children and adolescents (5–17 years), the recommendations are to participate in at least 60 min moderate-intensity to vigorous-intensity physical activity, engage in no more than 2 h sedentary recreational screen time, and have 9–11 h good-quality sleep each day.Children typically obtain their daily physical activity through active travel to school; physical education and recess; organised sports, games, and dance; active play; and spending time in playgrounds and parks. Conversely, most of their sedentary time and sleep are accumulated at home. As a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, opportunities for children to meet the movement behaviour guidelines have been affected by school closures and physical distancing measures implemented by many governments.To date, we have little evidence to know if, as a result of home confinement, children are spending less time active, going to bed later, and sleeping in later because they do not have to travel to school, or spending more time sedentary, especially through recreational screen time. Evidence shows that children are less active and more sedentary, with less consistent sleep patterns, on unstructured or non-school days (ie, when they are not physically at school) than on school days.
Community mobility data from Google across the 15 countries represented by our authorship show that—compared with the week ending Feb 23, 2020, before the WHO pandemic announcement—time spent in places associated with physical activity such as parks, beaches, and community gardens was down by 31%, and travel by public transport, which is also associated with physical activity, was down by 59% during the week ending April 5, 2020, after a pandemic was declared. Conversely, time spent in places of residence increased by an average of 17%. Compared with before the COVID-19 crisis, Canadians aged 15–49 years reported a 66% increase in time watching TV and 35% increase in time spent playing video games between March 29 and April 3, 2020. Interviews done with 15 parents of preschool children in Beijing, China, found that, compared with pre-COVID-19, nearly all children were going to bed later and waking up later. Sedentary screen time had increased and physical activity levels were very low, with children not being allowed outdoors (unpublished data). In South Korea, we surveyed 97 parents of young children between March 27 and 31, 2020; 79 (81%) reported that their children's screen time had increased and 46 (94%) of 49 reported that their children's use of play and sports facilities had decreased.If this pandemic has reduced healthy movement behaviours among children, we should be concerned for several reasons. First, data from the pre-COVID-19 period show that, on average, only a fifth of preschoolers and less than 10% of school-aged children meet all the movement guidelines. Given the strong associations of health outcomes with movement behaviours,3, 4 children's health will be even more compromised during COVID-19. Second, this period of home confinement—especially if indoors and in small spaces—could lead to higher risk of vitamin D deficiency, mental health issues, and myopia. Third, although children seem less susceptible to COVID-19, maintaining or increasing levels of physical activity can reduce their risk of respiratory infections. Fourth, benefits that help children to cope with life-changing circumstances, such as the role of physical activity in resilience building, might be compromised. Fifth, the interactive effects of each movement behaviour might be more pronounced—eg, children who are less active and engaged in more screen time are likely to have poorer sleep. Finally, there could be potential longer-term health and economic consequences if the adverse behavioural adaptations, such as less activity, become the new normal.It is important to examine whether children from low-income and middle-income countries and vulnerable families in high-income countries are especially at risk during the COVID-19 pandemic, as a greater proportion of these populations live in apartments or shelters that are exposed to overcrowding (appendix), making physical distancing virtually impossible. These groups tend to accumulate physical activity through outdoor play and active commuting to school, which is threatened by an increase in time indoors. Poorer neighbourhood safety—especially in countries where schools might be the only safe play space in the neighbourhood—make it harder for children to be active when schools are closed. At home, there might be reduced access to the internet or inability to pay for increased data usage to access online content such as videos and virtual activity classes.Many resources aimed at promoting healthy movement behaviours in children have rapidly emerged. As such, there is a real need to support stakeholders with a trusted source of activities and curated online resources. Such activities and resources should consider equity, minimal equipment, protection of children online, opportunities for parent–child interactions, and consideration of small spaces. This is especially crucial in communities with little access to the internet.Based on the evidence presented, we outline our recommendations for promoting healthy movement behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic (panel
). We acknowledge that many parents are juggling reduced income, food insecurity, and working from home while supervising their children's daily schooling, so movement behaviours might not be a priority. However, we believe that the pandemic provides an opportunity to raise awareness of movement behaviour guidelines for chIldren and to promote their uptake across all areas of society.Parents and carers should incorporate physical activity into children's daily routine (including using electronic media to facilitate participation) and encourage the whole family to join while adhering to regulations on physical distancing and access to outdoor spaces. Extended periods of sitting should be broken up every 30–60 min (eg, by standing and stretching for 1 min). They should follow sedentary recreational screen-time recommendations and encourage co-viewing and positive social interactions and experiences. To help children to get enough sleep, keep bed and wake times consistent, keep screens out of the room where children sleep, and avoid screen use before bedtime.Educators and teachers should know and promote the movement behaviour guidelines, and embrace opportunities to incorporate healthy movement messages, practices, and policies into daily home-school routines and lessons—eg, when scheduling online lessons, limit prolonged sitting and encourage changes in posture such as regularly standing, stretching, or moving on the spot.Health professionals should understand and recommend the current guidelines to parents, family members, and caregivers and reinforce their positive association with children's health during all visits, including remote contacts and telemedicine.Governments should promote healthy movement behaviours in children as part of response strategies and public messaging, and should engage influential people in promotion of such messages.The media should provide regular messages to promote physical activity and break up extended periods of sitting.Children should speak up and advocate for their right to a healthy, active life, while carefully observing pandemic restrictions. Forming peer groups can help with maintaining healthy movement behaviour patterns.
Authors: Gopal Nambi; Mshari Alghadier; Tamer E Elnegamy; Reem M Basuodan; Reem M Alwhaibi; Arul Vellaiyan; Naif A Nwihadh; Osama R Aldhafian; Anju Verma; Shahul Hameed Pakkir Mohamed; Mohamed Faisal Chevidikunnan; Fayaz Khan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-11 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Anthony D Okely; Katharina E Kariippanon; Hongyan Guan; Ellie K Taylor; Thomas Suesse; Penny L Cross; Kar Hau Chong; Adang Suherman; Ali Turab; Amanda E Staiano; Amy S Ha; Asmaa El Hamdouchi; Aqsa Baig; Bee Koon Poh; Borja Del Pozo-Cruz; Cecilia H S Chan; Christine Delisle Nyström; Denise Koh; E Kipling Webster; Himangi Lubree; Hong Kim Tang; Issad Baddou; Jesus Del Pozo-Cruz; Jyh Eiin Wong; Kuston Sultoni; Maria Nacher; Marie Löf; Mingming Cui; Mohammad Sorowar Hossain; P W Prasad Chathurangana; Uddhavi Kand; V P Pujitha Wickramasinghe; Rebecca Calleia; Shameema Ferdous; Thanh Van Kim; Xiaojuan Wang; Catherine E Draper Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Alexander J Hish; Charles T Wood; Janna B Howard; Kori B Flower; H Shonna Yin; Russell L Rothman; Alan M Delamater; Lee M Sanders; Aihua Bian; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Eliana M Perrin Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2020-11-05 Impact factor: 2.993
Authors: Paula Sol Ventura; Ana F Ortigoza; Yanira Castillo; Zelmira Bosch; Sara Casals; Cristina Girbau; Jose M Siurana; Amalia Arce; Marisa Torres; Francisco J Herrero Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 5.717