| Literature DB >> 33924070 |
A Silvia González1, Angela Riego2,3,4, Victor Vega1,5, Javier García1, Serena Galié2,3,4, Ignacio Gutiérrez Del Río2,3,4, Maria Del Valle Martínez de Yuso6, Claudio Jesús Villar2,3,4, Felipe Lombó2,3,4, Victor Manuel De la Prida1.
Abstract
In our study, we demonstrated the performance of antimicrobial coa<span class="Chemical">tings on properly functionalized and nanostructured 316L food-grade stainless steel pipelines. For the fabrication of these functional coatings, we employed facile and low-cost electrochemical techniques and surface modification processes. The development of a nanoporous structure on the 316L stainless steel surface was performed by following an electropolishing process in an electrolytic bath, at a constant anodic voltage of 40 V for 10 min, while the temperature was maintained between 0 and 10 °C. Subsequently, we incorporated on this nanostructure additional coatings with antimicrobial and bactericide properties, such as Ag nanoparticles, Ag films, or TiO2 thin layers. These functional coatings were grown on the nanostructured substrate by following electroless process, electrochemical deposition, and atomic layer deposition (ALD) techniques. Then, we analyzed the antimicrobial efficiency of these functionalized materials against different biofilms types (Candida parapsilosis, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis). The results of the present study demonstrate that the nanostructuring and surface functionalization processes constitute a promising route to fabricate novel functional materials exhibiting highly efficient antimicrobial features. In fact, we have shown that our use of an appropriated association of TiO2 layer and Ag nanoparticle coatings over the nanostructured 316L stainless steel exhibited an excellent antimicrobial behavior for all biofilms examined.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial activity; atomic layer deposition; biofilm; coatings; electroless; stainless steel pipelines; surface functionalization
Year: 2021 PMID: 33924070 PMCID: PMC8074267 DOI: 10.3390/nano11041055
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Schematic representation of a biofilm life cycle. (a) Bacteria attach to a surface and colonize it, (b) bacteria begin to produce slimy EPSs and they colonize the surface, (c) development of a complex three-dimensional structure, and (d) detachment of the biofilm and spreading. Image is self-created.
Compositional analysis of the 316L stainless steel plates.
| Element | Fe | C | Si | Mn | Ni | Cr | Mo | N | S | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % weight | balance | 0.018 | 0.48 | 1.34 | 10.03 | 16.57 | 2.00 | 0.038 | 0.002 | 0.029 |
Figure 2Schematic description of the nanostructuring and functionalization procedure performed on starting 316L food-grade stainless steel. Image is self-created.
Parameters of the method.
| Inductively Coupled Plasma | Mass Spectrometer |
|---|---|
| RF power (W) 1550 | Sampling cone nickel |
| Carrier gas (L/min) 1.07 | Skimmer cone nickel |
| Plasma gas (L/min) 15.0 | Peak Pattern 1 points |
| Sample depth (mm) 10.0 | Replicates 3 |
| Nebulizer pump (rps) 0.10 | Sweeps/replicates 100 |
| Nebulizer MicroMist | Integration time/mass 0.2 s/ion |
Sample type employed for the different antibiofilm assays.
| Sample Type | Characteristics |
|---|---|
| S1 | Negative control, unmodified stainless steel |
| S2 | Stainless steel with electropolished treatment (EP steel) |
| S3 | EP steel with electroless plated Ag coating (Ag nanoparticle coatings) |
| S4 | EP steel with Ag electrodeposited (Ag film coating) |
| S5 | EP steel with TiO2 thin films grown by atomic layer deposition (TiO2 film coating) |
| S6 | EP steel with TiO2 films plus electroless plated Ag coating |
| S7 | EP steel with double TiO2 films plus electroless plated Ag coating |
| S8 | EP steel with TiO2 films plus double electroless plated Ag coating |
Figure 3SEM top surface views corresponding to the sample S1 (a), sample S2 (b), sample S3 (c), sample S4 (d), sample S5 (e), and samples with AgNPs plus TiO2 films with different proportions (samples S6-S8) (f). The respective histograms show the pore radii distribution obtained from each SEM micrograph, ranging between 50 and 60 nm.
Figure 4Ag 3d core level XPS spectra for the samples S3, S4, and S6.
Figure 5Ag M5NN Auger spectrum obtained from the sample S6.
Figure 6Ti2p core level XPS spectra for the samples S5 and S6.
Figure 7XPS spectra with different contributions of O1s for the samples S3, S4, S5, and S6.
Ion migration values from different sample coatings.
| Sample Name | 47 Ti | 107 Ag | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conc. (ppb) | Conc. RSD | Conc. (ppb) | Conc. RSD | |
| S1 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 0.4 |
| S2 | 4.0 | 3.4 | 5.1 | 0.7 |
| S3 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 382.7 | 3.2 |
| S4 | 0.1 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| S5 | 5.6 | 1 | 1.8 | 0.7 |
| S6 | 4.0 | 11.2 | 1457.4 | 3.1 |
| S7 | 4.6 | 9.4 | 349.6 | 1.2 |
| S8 | 7.1 | 8.1 | 17.5 | 0.5 |
Figure 8PL emission spectra of the samples functionalized with different coatings: (a) EP steel with Ag coatings (samples S3–S4); (b) EP steel with TiO2 thin films (sample S5); (c) EP steel with double TiO2 films plus electroless plated Ag coating (sample S7); (d) EP steel with TiO2 films plus electroless plated Ag coating (sample S6); and (e) EP steel with TiO2 films plus double electroless plated Ag coating (sample S8).
Bandgap values of different samples.
| Sample | |
|---|---|
| S3 | 2.2 ± 0.1 |
| S5 | 2.15 ± 0.02 |
| S7 | 2.15 ± 0.02 |
| S6 | 2.1 ± 0.1 |
| S8 | 2.0 ± 0.1 |
Figure 9CFU values obtained after the biofilm assays on the 8 different types of metal probes: (a) S. aureus, (b) S. epidermidis, (c) E. coli, (d) Ps. aeruginosa, (e) C. parapsilosis, (f) B. cereus. Statistically significant differences (ANOVA test, p-value < 0.05) are marked with an asterisk: p-value for S. aureus S1–S4 comparison is 0.0440, p-value for C. parapsilosis S1–S7 comparison is 0.0229.