Literature DB >> 33924063

Cytotoxicity of Different Composite Resins on Human Gingival Fibroblast Cell Lines.

Riccardo Beltrami1, Marco Colombo1, Keren Rizzo1, Alessio Di Cristofaro2, Claudio Poggio1, Giampiero Pietrocola2.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the cytotoxic effects of eight composite resins on immortalized human gingival fibroblasts. Composite resins were eluted in cell culture medium for 48 or 72 h at 37 °C. Immortalized human gingival fibroblast-1 (HGF-1) cell lines were seeded in 96-well (1 × 104) plates and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C with the obtained extraction medium. The percentage of viable cells in each well (MTT test) was calculated relative to control cells, which were set to 100%. Data observed were not normally distributed, and nonparametric statistical methods were used for statistical analysis. The Wilcoxon test was used for intragroup comparison, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for intergroup multiple comparisons. Significance value was set as p < 0.05. All materials tested showed cytotoxic effects on gingival fibroblasts, recordable as noncytotoxic, mildly cytotoxic or severely cytotoxic, depending on the percentage of cell viability. The Wilcoxon test for intragroup comparison showed that the percentage of viable cells decreased significantly for extracts, for all composite resins tested. The composite resins contained monomers that displayed cytotoxic properties. BisGMA, TEGDMA and UDMA had inhibitory effects and induced apoptotic proteins in pulp fibroblast. Composite resins that contained lower percentages of unbound free monomers-and that released less ions-possessed superior biocompatibility in vitro.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MTT test; composite resins; cytotoxicity; gingival fibroblast

Year:  2021        PMID: 33924063     DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics6020026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomimetics (Basel)        ISSN: 2313-7673


  26 in total

1.  Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations.

Authors:  Michele Paolantonio; Simonetta D'ercole; Giuseppe Perinetti; Domenico Tripodi; Giovanni Catamo; Emanuela Serra; Claudia Bruè; Raffaele Piccolomini
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.728

2.  Clinical performance of ormocer, nanofilled, and nanoceramic resin composites in Class I and Class II restorations: a three-year evaluation.

Authors:  S H Mahmoud; A E El-Embaby; A M AbdAllah
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 2.440

3.  Monomer elution from nanohybrid and ormocer-based composites cured with different light sources.

Authors:  Dragica Manojlovic; Marina Radisic; Tatjana Vasiljevic; Slavoljub Zivkovic; Mila Lausevic; Vesna Miletic
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  Tooth slice organ culture and established cell line culture models for cytotoxicity assessment of dental materials.

Authors:  Tzuen Yih Saw; Tong Cao; Adrian U Jin Yap; Mary Mah Lee Ng
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Long-term elution of monomers from resin-based dental composites.

Authors:  Eveline Putzeys; Siemon De Nys; Stevan M Cokic; Radu Corneliu Duca; Jeroen Vanoirbeek; Lode Godderis; Bart Van Meerbeek; Kirsten L Van Landuyt
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  Correlation of cytotoxicity, filler loading and curing time of dental composites.

Authors:  W F Caughman; G B Caughman; R A Shiflett; F Rueggeberg; G S Schuster
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Effects of glass ionomer and microfilled composite subgingival restorations on periodontal tissue and subgingival biofilm: a 6-month evaluation.

Authors:  Vanessa Renata Santos; Juliana Antico Lucchesi; Sheila Cavalca Cortelli; Cristiane Mariote Amaral; Magda Feres; Poliana Mendes Duarte
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.993

8.  Cytotoxicity testing of methyl and ethyl 2-cyanoacrylate using direct contact assay on osteoblast cell cultures.

Authors:  Willian Morais De Melo; William Marcatti Amarú Maximiano; Antônio Azoubel Antunes; Marcio Mateus Beloti; Adalberto Luiz Rosa; Paulo Tambasco de Oliveira
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 9.  In vitro and in vivo studies on the toxicity of dental resin components: a review.

Authors:  Michel Goldberg
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 10.  Advances in Nanotechnology for Restorative Dentistry.

Authors:  Zohaib Khurshid; Muhammad Zafar; Saad Qasim; Sana Shahab; Mustafa Naseem; Ammar AbuReqaiba
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 3.623

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparative study of effective antibiofilm activity of beneficial microbes-mediated zirconia nanoparticles.

Authors:  Sowmya Balaji; Venkat Kumar Shanmugam
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.434

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.