Literature DB >> 15582365

Tooth slice organ culture and established cell line culture models for cytotoxicity assessment of dental materials.

Tzuen Yih Saw1, Tong Cao, Adrian U Jin Yap, Mary Mah Lee Ng.   

Abstract

The aim was to compare the use of different cell-material contact test methods with two different biological systems (cell line and tooth slice cultures) for cytotoxicity assessment of dental materials. Cytotoxicity of composites polymerized with two halogen-based and two light-emitting diode (LED) light-curing units (LCUs) served as the basis for comparison. Disk shaped specimens (7 x 2 mm) were fabricated using the four light sources. Composites were tested using L-929 cell line using direct/indirect/extract tests in accordance to standard protocols. Cytotoxicity was assessed using neutral red uptake. Tooth slice organ cultures were also employed to test the dental materials using direct/indirect test methods. Histomorphometric cell counting of intact odontoblasts and pulp fibroblasts and the use of tetrazolium salt 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assays were applied for cytotoxicity evaluation. Discrepancy in result presentation was observed in the different tests used with L-929. Sensitivity levels of the L-929 tests ranked as follows: extract test < direct contact test < indirect contact test. Tooth slice tests confirmed that L-929 direct contact test proved to be the most reliable test among the three. In conclusion, this study highlights the risk involved when relying on a single test method for cytotoxicity assessment. It would be advisable to test different culture models and then proceed using more clinically relevant biological system that stimulate the in vivo situation for confirmation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15582365     DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2004.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  8 in total

1.  Establishment of in vitro culture system for evaluating dentin-pulp complex regeneration with special reference to the differentiation capacity of BrdU label-retaining dental pulp cells.

Authors:  Hiroko Ida-Yonemochi; Mitsushiro Nakatomi; Hayato Ohshima
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 4.304

2.  Cytotoxicity of Different Composite Resins on Human Gingival Fibroblast Cell Lines.

Authors:  Riccardo Beltrami; Marco Colombo; Keren Rizzo; Alessio Di Cristofaro; Claudio Poggio; Giampiero Pietrocola
Journal:  Biomimetics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-20

3.  Biocompatibility Evaluation of Four Dentin Adhesives Used as Indirect Pulp Capping Materials.

Authors:  Olga Cortés; Antonia Alcaina; Antonia Bernabé
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2017-06

4.  Evaluation of Injectable Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogels for Endodontic Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Esteban Astudillo-Ortiz; Pedro S Babo; Rui L Reis; Manuela E Gomes
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 5.  A critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study biocompatibility of endodontic materials.

Authors:  Sepanta Hosseinpour; Alexis Gaudin; Ove A Peters
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 5.165

6.  Effects of current provisional restoration materials on the viability of fibroblasts.

Authors:  Mustafa Ulker; H Esra Ulker; Mustafa Zortuk; Mehmet Bulbul; Ali Riza Tuncdemir; M Selim Bilgin
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2009-04

7.  Residual HEMA and TEGDMA release and cytotoxicity evaluation of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and compomers cured with different light sources.

Authors:  Murat Selim Botsali; Adem Kuşgöz; Subutay Han Altintaş; Hayriye Esra Ülker; Mehmet Tanriver; Serdar Kiliç; Feridun Başak; Mustafa Ülker
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-01-28

8.  Restorative Materials Exposed to Acid Challenge: Influence of Temperature on In Vitro Weight Loss.

Authors:  Riccardo Beltrami; Marco Colombo; Gianpaolo Bitonti; Marco Chiesa; Claudio Poggio; Giampiero Pietrocola
Journal:  Biomimetics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.