| Literature DB >> 33924054 |
Angela Salzano1, Alessio Cotticelli1, Raffaele Marrone1, Michael J D'Occhio2, Nunzia D'Onofrio3, Gianluca Neglia1, Rosa Luisa Ambrosio1, Maria Luisa Balestrieri3, Giuseppe Campanile1.
Abstract
Recently, several concerns have been expressed on red meat quality and consumption. The aims of this study were to evaluate the influence of different breeding techniques and a prolonged post dry aging (PDA) maturation process on biomolecules level in raw buffalo meat. In the first experiment, two groups of animals were maintained with different space availability (15 vs. 10 m2/animal) for 90 days and biomolecules content was evaluated. In experiment 2, two diets (with or without ryegrass green forage) were used to assess the concentration of these biomolecules. Finally, in experiment 3, the meat of the animals that showed the highest content of biomolecules was chosen to assess the influence of the PDA maturation process. Buffaloes reared at 15 m2 showed a significantly (p < 0.05) higher content of the considered biomolecules compared with their counterparts. Similarly, buffaloes fed green forage showed higher content of biomolecules (p < 0.05) compared with the control group. The meat of the animals bred at 15 m2 and fed green forage showed a significant (p < 0.01) increase of biomolecules content during the PDA maturation process up to 60 days without influence microbiological profile in terms of total aerobic bacterial counts, yeasts, and molds. In conclusion, breeding techniques and PDA maturation system could enhance biomolecules levels in terms of quality, without affect health standards.Entities:
Keywords: buffalo meat; functional molecules; meat quality; post dry aging
Year: 2021 PMID: 33924054 PMCID: PMC8072788 DOI: 10.3390/vetsci8040066
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Sci ISSN: 2306-7381
Feed (kg) and chemical composition (% of dry matter, DM) of the diet for buffalo bulls reared at 10 and 15 m2/head.
| Feed | kg |
|---|---|
| Straw | 3 |
| Concentrate | 7 |
| Water | 8 |
| TOTAL | 18 |
| MFU/kg DM |
|
| 0.93 | |
| TDN (%) | 69.4 |
|
| |
| Dry Matter (kg) | 8.6 |
| Dry matter (%) | 47.7 |
| Moisture (%) | 52.3 |
| CP (%) | 12.3 |
| EE (%) | 3.5 |
| NDF (%) | 36.0 |
| ADF (%) | 16.0 |
| ADL (%) | 5.0 |
| NSC (%) | 42.2 |
| Calcium (%) | 0.7 |
| Phosphorus (%) | 0.4 |
MFU = meat forage unit; TDN = total digestible nutrients; CP = crude protein; EE = ether extract; NDF = neutral detergent fiber; ADF = acid detergent fiber; ADL = acid detergent lignin; NSC = non-structural carbohydrates.
Feed (kg) and chemical composition (% of dry matter, DM) of the diet in buffaloes with (S+/F) or without (S+/D) rye grass inclusion.
| Feed | Diet (kg) | |
|---|---|---|
| S+/D | S+/F | |
| Rye grass | - | 12 |
| Straw | 3 | 2 |
| Concentrate | 7 | 5 |
| Calcium carbonate | - | 0.1 |
| Water | 8 | - |
| TOTAL | 18.0 | 19.1 |
|
| ||
| MFU/kg DM | 0.93 | 0.93 |
| TDN (%) | 69.4 | 69.4 |
|
| ||
| Dry Matter (kg) | 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Dry matter (%) | 47.7 | 44.7 |
| CP (%) | 12.3 | 12.2 |
| EE (%) | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| NDF (%) | 36.0 | 36.1 |
| ADF (%) | 16.0 | 19.4 |
| ADL (%) | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NSC (%) | 42.2 | 41.7 |
| Ca (%) | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| P (%) | 0.4 | 0.4 |
MFU = meat forage unit; TDN = total digestible nutrients; CP = crude protein; EE = ether extract; NDF = neutral detergent fiber; ADF = acid detergent fiber; ADL = acid detergent lignin; NSC = non-structural carbohydrates.
Effects of availability of space and different feeding regimen on animal growth, daily average gain, dry matter intake, live body weight at slaughterhouse, and carcass weight and yield of buffalo meat in animal bred at 10 m2 (S−), at 15 m2 (S+), and fed total mixed ratio (S+/D) or green forage (S+/F). Values are expressed in percentages or as the mean ± ES.
| Group | Daily Average Gain (g) | Dry Matter Intake (%) | Live Body Weight (kg) | Carcass Weight (kg) | Lean Mass (%) | Bone Mass (%) | Fat Mass (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S+ | 720 ± 16.7 | 1.72 | 520 ± 4.7 | 257.7 ± 8.1 | 62.7 A | 25.8 A | 10.9 a |
| S− | 675 ± 15.9 | 1.75 | 513 ± 7.0 | 252.8 ± 9.9 | 52.9 B | 38.1 B | 8.7 a |
| S+/D | 838 ± 9.2 | 1.73 | 533 ± 7.0 | 271.8 ± 3.4 | 57.8 | 22.9 A | 18.9 b |
| S+/F | 849 ± 12.0 | 1.70 | 540 ± 4.7 | 273.7 ± 2.4 | 58.9 | 22.5 A | 18.5 b |
a,b values within columns differ p < 0.05; A,B values within columns differ p < 0.01.
Functional metabolites in buffalo meat in animal bred at 10 m2 (S−), at 15 m2 (S+), and fed total mixed ratio (S+/D) or green forage (S+/F). Metabolites’ concentration (mg/Kg) is expressed as the mean ± ES. Statistical analysis was performed using t-test. Glycine betaine, GlyBet; γ-Butyrobetaine, γBB; δ-Valerobetaine, δVB; L-Carnitine, Cnt; Acetylcarnitine (C2Cnt); Propionylcarnitine (C3Cnt); Butyrylcarnitine (n-C4Cnt).
| GlyBet | γBB | δVB | Cnt | C2Cnt | C3Cnt | n-C4Cnt | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S− | 54.50 ± 2.52 A | 13.27 ± 0.54 | 44.41 ± 1.19 A | 271.67 ± 5.40 a | 236.38 ± 11.24 a | 26.26 ± 2.3 A | 134.38 ± 4.02 |
| S+ | 66.57 ± 1.13 B | 13.20 ± 0.64 | 55.73 ± 1.81 B | 285.54 ± 3.22 b | 294.10 ± 13.65 b | 37.21 ± 1.66 B | 158.06± 4.76 |
| S+/D | 68.90 ± 0.60 A | 14.54 ± 0.55 | 56.83 ± 1.8 A | 293.14 ± 3.43 A | 295.19 ± 4.02 a | 36.34 ± 1.22 a | 162.59 ± 4.51 a |
| S+/F | 79.67 ± 1.45 B | 14.29 ± 1.14 | 71.13 ± 1.37 B | 317.40 ± 5.06 B | 330.16 ± 5.74 b | 42.89 ± 1.31 b | 174.57 ± 1.56 b |
a,b values within columns differ p < 0.05; A,B values within columns differ p < 0.01.
Activity water (aw), pH, and weight loss during meat maturation time comes from animals fed with green forage and bred at low density (S+/F) in Longissimus muscle at T0, 30 days (T1), and 60 days (T2) after maturation.
| Group | aw | pH | Weight Loss (kg) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | T1 | T2 | T0 | T1 | T2 | Weight T0 | Weight Loss T1 | Weight Loss T2 | |
| S+/F | 0.98 ± 0.00 | 0.98 ± 0.00 | 0.98 ± 0.00 | 5.5 ± 0.02 | 5.7 ± 0.01 | 5.7 ± 0.03 | 18.1 ± 0.9 | 1.4 ± 0.0 | 2.1 ± 0.0 |
Functional metabolites in meat of buffalo bulls fed with green forages and rear at low density conditions at T0, 30 days (T1), and 60 days (T2) after maturation. Metabolites’ concentration (mg/Kg) is expressed as the mean ± ES.
| Metabolites | T0 | T1 | T2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glycine betaine | 80.6 ± 3.1 B | 118.3 ± 8.3 b | 160.3 ± 17.5 A |
| γ-Butyrobetaine | 15.2 ± 0.8 | 17.2 ± 0.4 | 18.9 ± 0.7 |
| δ-Valerobetaine | 66.5 ± 4.8 B | 90.7 ± 3.1 b | 129.0 ± 5.5 A |
| L-Carnitine | 354.7 ± 8.0 B | 424.0 ± 4.3 b | 495.1 ± 9.3 A |
| Acetylcarnitine | 328.0 ± 7.0 B | 377.1 ± 3.1 b | 449.2 ± 22.0 A |
| Propionylcarnitine | 41.2 ± 1.1 B | 50.0 ± 0.8 b | 57.2 ± 2.7 A |
| Butyrylcarnitine | 171.8 ± 3.4 B | 193.0 ± 4.0 b | 216.2 ± 6.1 A |
| Choline | 16.1 ± 1.9 B | 22.7 ± 0.7 B | 43.8 ± 2.4 A |
| Glycerophosphocholine | 206.8 ± 9.5 B | 259.0 ± 8.0 B | 379.7 ± 17.8 A |
A,B values within row differ p < 0.01; A,b values within row differ p < 0.05.
Effect of post dry aging on microbiological profile measured as Log (CFU/g) of buffalo meat fed ray grass and bred at low density (S+/F) in Longissimus muscle at T0, 30 days (T1), and 60 days (T2) after maturation.
| Mesophilic Microbe Content | Enterobacteriaceae | Coagulase-Positive Staphylococci | Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci | Yeast | Mold | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S+/F T0 | 4.70 ± 0.31 | 1.35 ± 0.00 | 4.21 ± 0.26 | 4.74 ± 0.65 | 3.01 ± 0.34 | 2.05 ± 0.10 |
| S+/F T1 | 4.72 ± 0.52 | 1.40 ± 0.18 | 4.17 ± 0.58 | 4.43 ± 0.63 | 2.85 ± 0.67 | 2.05 ± 0.13 |
| S+/F T2 | 4.76 ± 0.29 | 1.30 ± 0.00 | 4.21 ± 0.65 | 4.74 ± 0.32 | 2.97 ± 0.65 | 2.76 ± 0.40 |
Effect of post dry aging on Listeria growth in inoculated samples of buffalo S+/F meat stored at 2° and 4 °C. Listeria concentration (Log (CFU/g)) is expressed as the mean ± SEM for each inoculated group and at each sampling time.
| Day | Log (CFU/g) | Growth Potential (Log (CFU/g)) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 °C |
| 4 °C |
| 2 °C | 4 °C | |
| Mean ± SEM | Mean ± SEM | δ | δ | |||
| D0 | 1.90 ± 0.03 A | 2.17 ± 0.08 B | - | - | ||
| D1 | 2.39 ± 0.02 | *** | 2.44 ± 0.17 | NS | 0.49 | 0.26 |
| D2 | 2.44 ± 0.01 A | * | 2.22 ± 0.05 B | NS | 0.54 | 0.05 |
| D3 | 2.41 ± 0.03 A | NS | 3.31 ± 0.03 B | *** | 0.51 | 1.14 |
| D4 | 2.26 ± 0.10 A | NS | 4.11 ± 0.02 B | *** | 0.36 | 1.94 |
| D5 | 2.32 ± 0.08 A | NS | 4.21 ± 0.03 B | * | 0.42 | 2.04 |
| D8 | 2.23 ± 0.17 A | NS | 4.29 ± 0.06 B | NS | 0.33 | 2.11 |
| D11 | 2.06 ± 0.10 A | NS | 4.44 ± 0.06 B | NS | 0.15 | 2.27 |
| D14 | 1.84 ± 0.12 A | NS | 4.92 ± 0.04 B | *** | −0.06 | 2.75 |
| D18 | 1.10 ± 0.10 A | *** | 5.16 ± 0.04 B | *** | −0.80 | 2.99 |
| D21 | 0.67 ± 0.33 A | *** | 5.19 ± 0.02 B | NS | −1.23 | 3.01 |
A,B values within row differ p < 0.01, * and *** values within column differ p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively. Statistical analyses were carried out to evaluate Listeria growth trend between two consecutive sampling times.
Figure 1Effect of post dry aging on Listeria growth in inoculated samples of buffalo S+/F meat stored at 2° and 4 °C. Listeria concentration (Log (CFU/g)) and growth potential (Log (CFU/g)) are expressed as means ± SEM for each inoculated group.