| Literature DB >> 33923790 |
Jingrong Gao1, Shan He2,3, Anindya Nag4.
Abstract
This paper deals with recent progress in the use of laser-induced graphene sensors for the electrochemical detection of glucose molecules. The exponential increase in the exploitation of the laser induction technique to generate porous graphene from polymeric and other naturally occurring materials has provided a podium for researchers to fabricate flexible sensors with high dynamicity. These sensors have been employed largely for electrochemical applications due to their distinct advantages like high customization in their structural dimensions, enhanced characteristics and easy roll-to-roll production. These laser-induced graphene (LIG)-based sensors have been employed for a wide range of sensorial applications, including detection of ions at varying concentrations. Among the many pivotal electrochemical uses in the biomedical sector, the use of these prototypes to monitor the concentration of glucose molecules is constantly increasing due to the essentiality of the presence of these molecules at specific concentrations in the human body. This paper shows a categorical classification of the various uses of these sensors based on the type of materials involved in the fabrication of sensors. The first category constitutes examples where the electrodes have been functionalized with various forms of copper and other types of metallic nanomaterials. The second category includes other miscellaneous forms where the use of both pure and composite forms of LIG-based sensors has been shown. Finally, the paper concludes with some of the possible measures that can be taken to enhance the use of this technique to generate optimized sensing prototypes for a wider range of applications.Entities:
Keywords: copper; glucose; laser-induced graphene; nanomaterials; sensors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33923790 PMCID: PMC8073164 DOI: 10.3390/s21082818
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Overview of the use of graphene for different sensory applications [58]. Copyright 2019 AGH University of Science and Technology.
Figure 2Principle of the formation of laser-induced graphene. Structure of polyimide film (a) before and (b) after the laser irradiation process [85]. Copyright 2019 MDPI.
Figure 3Illustration of the use of laser-induced graphene (LIG) for different applications [97]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
Comparison of the power source and raw materials for the generation of different laser-induced graphene (LIG) outputs [78]. Copyright 2018 Taylor & Francis Group.
| Table | Light Sources | Power/Energy Density | Material | Characteristics | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous-wave laser | CO2 laser | 5.4 W | Polyimide | Increase in power decreased oxygen and nitrogen content in LIG to <3% | [ |
| CO2 laser | 2–60 W/cm2 | Single-layered Graphene | Obvious thermal effect | [ | |
| Optically pumped solid-state laser | 5 W | CH4 and H2 | Rapid single-step fabrication of graphene patterns | [ | |
| CO2 laser | 27 W | Polyimide sheet | Organic ligands assisted in forming a homogenous cover. | [ | |
| CO2 laser | 138.4 mJ/cm2 | Silicon carbide | Graphene layers appear like small islands, spreading over the substrate surface. | [ | |
| CO2 laser | 26.5 W | Graphene oxide | Low repetition rates increase the pulse-to-pulse distance, leaving graphene oxide between pulse spots. | [ | |
| Pulsed laser | Nd: YAG/5 ns | 200 mJ/cm2 | Single-layered Graphene | Produce visible damage | [ |
| Nd: YAG/7 ns | 40 mJ/cm2 | MLG | Local profile transformation | [ | |
| 248 nm/25 ns | 1.2 J/cm2 | Silicon carbide | Fabricated the graphene patterns on silicon carbide | [ | |
| 248 nm/5 ns | 120 mJ/cm2 | Graphene oxide | An effective approach for photo-reduction with minimal defects | [ | |
| 10–6 µm/14 µs | 2.4–5.4 W | Polyimide (PI)/Wood | One-step preparation of porous graphene | [ | |
| 1–06 µm/10 ns | 3.6–5.1 W | PI | Forming a unique honeycomb porous graphene | [ | |
| Ultrashort pulse laser | 1064 nm/ps | 100 W | Multi-layered Graphene | Precise control thinning graphene layers | [ |
| Eolite/30 ps | 15 µJ | Single-layered Graphene | One-step induction | [ | |
| Ti: Sa/130 fs | 150–320 mJ/cm2 | Single-layered Graphene | Induction threshold measurement | [ | |
| Ti: Sa/50 fs | 3 TW/cm2 | Multi-layered Graphene | Single-shot damage threshold | [ | |
| −/550 fs | 100–500 nJ | Single-layered Graphene | Nanometer-scale patterning | [ | |
| Ti: Sa/100 fs | 47–968 mJ/cm2 | Graphene oxide | Little or no graphitization | [ |
Comparison between some of the common metallic nanomaterials that have been used for functionalization for the detection of glucose molecules.
| Sensing Materials | Analytical Method | Linear Range (µm) | Limit of Detection (µm) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gold nanoparticles, Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes | Cyclic voltammetry | 0.1–10 | 0.03 | [ |
| Polyvinyl acetate, graphene oxide, copper | Cyclic voltammetry | 550–4400 | 53 | [ |
| Chitosan/Silver nanoparticles | Calorimetry | 5–200 | 0.1 | [ |
| Platinum, manganese oxide | Calorimetry | 5–500 | 0.18 | [ |
| Mucilage, silver nanoparticles | Cyclic voltammetry | 10–2200 | 10 | [ |
| Graphene quantum dots, silver nanoparticles | Calorimetry | 0.5–400 | 0.17 | [ |
| Glassy carbon electrode, titanium dioxide, polyaniline | Electrochemistry and chronoamperometry | 20–6000 | 18 | [ |
| Zinc cobaltite, indium tin oxide | Cyclic voltammetry and chrono-amperometric | 10–290 | 36.9 | [ |
| Graphene oxide/silver nanoparticles | Electrochemistry | 2000–12,000 | 310 | [ |
| Cerium oxide nanoparticles | Fluorimetry | 10–200 | 8.9 | [ |
| Polyethylenimine /Silver nanocubes | Fluorimetry | 10–1000 | 0.8 | [ |
Figure 4The fabrication process of the LIG-decorated sensors for the detection of glucose molecules [140]. (a) Raw materials included Kapton tape and PVC sheet. (b,c) The direct laser reduction of Kapton tapes to form graphene. (d) Formation of DREG-3 electrode platform. Copyright 2016 Springer Nature.
Figure 5Schematic illustration of the fabrication of the Cu nanoparticles (NPs)-modified LIG-based sensors [142]. (a) The laser induction of the PI films was done (a) The LIG was formed form PI films. (b) A part of the films was the induction process was carried out, (c) it was connected to zinc films. (d) The whole structure was encapsulated with PET films and (e,f) dipped into copper sulfate solutions to form Cn-functionalized LIG sensors. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
Summary of the performances of the copper nanomaterials-functionalized LIG-based sensors.
| Materials | Functionalization Technique | Characteristics | Analysis Method | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Graphene, copper nanocubes, Polyimide | Electroplating | Avg. resistance value: 15.6 Ω/cm | Cyclic voltammetry | [ |
| Sensitivity: 1643.31 µA/mm·cm2 | ||||
| Linear range: 0.05 mm–1 m | ||||
| Limit of detection: 0.05 mm | ||||
| Graphene, copper nanocubes, polyvinyl chloride | Electrodeposition | Sensitivity: 1643.31 µA/mm·cm2 | Cyclic voltammetry | [ |
| Linear range: 25 µm–4 mm | ||||
| Limit of detection: 250 nm | ||||
| Reproducibility: 96.8% | ||||
| Stability: 97.4% | ||||
| Graphene, copper nanoparticles, Polyimide | Chrono-potentiometry | Sensitivity: 1438.8 μA/mm·cm2 | Cyclic voltammetry | [ |
| Limit of detection: 124 nm | ||||
| Graphene, copper nanoparticles, Zinc foil, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) | Substrate-assisted electroless deposition | Sensitivity: 495 μA/mm·cm2 | Cyclic voltammetry | [ |
| Limit of detection: 0.39 µm | ||||
| Response time: <0.5 s | ||||
| Graphene, copper oxide nanoparticles, commercial scotch brand tape | 3D patterning | Linear range: 1 µm–5 µm | Cyclic voltammetry | [ |
| Limit of detection: 0.1 µm | ||||
| Response time: <0.2 s | ||||
| Graphene, copper oxide, | Electrodeposition | Sensitivity: 1321.54 μAL/mmol·cm2 | Cyclic voltammetry | [ |
| Reproducibility: 5.47% |
Figure 6(a) Surface-modification of the sensors. (b) Chemical vapor (CV) technique was used to test the prototypes for glucose measurement [145]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
Summary of the performances of the copper nanomaterials-functionalized LIG-based sensors.
| Materials | Functionalization Technique | Characteristics | Analysis Method | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Graphene, platinum nanoparticles | Electrodeposition | Sensitivity: 4.622 µA/mm | Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy | [ |
| Signal to noise ratio: 3 | ||||
| Linear range: 300 nm–2.1 mm | ||||
| Limit of detection: 300 nm | ||||
| Graphene, MXene, Prussian blue | Spray-coating | Sensitivity: 212.5 µA/mm·cm2 | Chrono-amperometry and cyclic voltammetry | [ |
| Linear range: 0–10 mm | ||||
| Limit of detection: 0.3 µm | ||||
| Graphene, platinum nanoparticles, gold nanoparticles | Drop-casting and electrodeposition | Detection range: −0–1.1 mm | Amperometry and cyclic voltammetry | [ |
| Linearity: 0.99 | ||||
| Limit of detection: 5 µm | ||||
| Graphene, Cadmium sulfide particles, Nickel nanoparticles | Drop-casting | High stability, reproducibility and selectivity | Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry | [ |
| Limit of detection: 0.4 µm | ||||
| Graphene, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), platinum nanoparticles, gold nanoparticles | Electrodeposition | Sensitivity: 865.8 µA/mm·cm2 | Cyclic voltammetry and amperometry | [ |
| Limit of detection: 75 nm |
Figure 7Schematic representation of the (I) fabrication of the sensors and (II) working mechanism of the prototypes [153]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
Figure 8Schematic diagram of the fabrication process of the LIG patterns using visible light 305 nm semiconductor lasers [89]. Copyright 2018 Elsevier.
Summary of the performances of the un-functionalized LIG-based sensors for glucose detection.
| Materials | Fabrication Technique | Characteristics | Analysis Method | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Graphene, PDMS, Kapton | Laser induction, soft lithography | Linear range: 10–40 mm | Cyclic voltammetry and Energy dispersive spectroscopy | [ |
| Power density: 13 µW/cm2 | ||||
| Graphene, Polyimide | Laser induction | Sensitivity: 252.3 µA µm−1 cm−2 | Cyclic voltammetry | [ |
| Linear range: 10–40 mm | ||||
| Limit of detection: 0.564 µm | ||||
| Detection range: 0–10 µm | ||||
| Graphene, poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT): PSS, Polyaniline | Spray-coating | Sensitivity: 247.3 µA µm−1 cm−2 | Cyclic voltammetry and Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy | [ |
| Linear range: 10 µm–9.2 mm | ||||
| Limit of detection: 3 µm | ||||
| Graphene, PET, glass slides, metal foils, ceramic plates | Drop-casting | Linear range: 0.2–10 mm | Cyclic voltammetry | [ |
| Detection range: 0–10 mm | ||||
| Graphene, glucose oxidase, polyimide | Drop-casting | Linear range: 1–100 µm | Luminescence | [ |
| Detection range: 0.138 µm | ||||
| Linearity (R2): 0.9449 |
Summary of the performance of the LIG-based sensors in terms of different sensing parameters.
| Processed Materials | Sensitivity | Linear Range | Limit of Detection | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIG, copper nanocubes | 1643.31 μA/mm·cm2 | 0.05 mm–1 mm | 0.05 mm | [ |
| LIG, copper nanocubes | 4532.2 μA/mm·cm2 | 25 µm–4 mm | 250 nm | [ |
| LIG, copper nanoparticles | 1438.8A μ/mm·cm2 | 0.124–9.653 M, 1–4 mm | 124 nm | [ |
| LIG, Copper oxide nanoparticles | 1 μm–5 mm | 0.1 μm | [ | |
| LIG, Platinum nanoparticles | 4.622 μA/mm | 0–2.1 mm | <300 nm | [ |
| LIG, Prussian Blue | 49.2 µA mm−1 cm−2 | 10 µm–5.3 mm | 0.3 µm | [ |
| LIG, Gold nanoparticles | 6.4 μA/mm·cm2 | 0–1.1 mm | 5 µm | [ |
| LIG, Nickel, Cadmium Sulfide | Correlation coefficient: 0.9976 | 0.4 µm | [ | |
| LIG | 294.6 µA µm−1 cm−2, 252.3 µA µm−1 cm−2 | 0.0001–0.001 mmol L−1, 0.001–0.01 mmol L−1 | 0.564 µm, | [ |
| LIG, PEDOT: PSS | 247.3 μA mm−1 cm−2 | 10 μm−9.2 mm | 3 μm | [ |