| Literature DB >> 33923529 |
Sanower Hossain1, Zannat Urbi2, Hidayah Karuniawati3, Ramisa Binti Mohiuddin4, Ahmed Moh Qrimida5, Akrm Mohamed Masaud Allzrag5, Long Chiau Ming6, Ester Pagano7, Raffaele Capasso8.
Abstract
Infectious disease (ID) is one of the top-most serious threats to human health globally, further aggravated by antimicrobial resistance and lack of novel immunization options. Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Wall. ex Nees and its metabolites have been long used to treat IDs. Andrographolide, derived from A. paniculata, can inhibit invasive microbes virulence factors and regulate the host immunity. Controlled clinical trials revealed that A. paniculata treatment is safe and efficacious for acute respiratory tract infections like common cold and sinusitis. Hence, A. paniculata, mainly andrographolide, could be considered as an excellent candidate for antimicrobial drug development. Considering the importance, medicinal values, and significant role as antimicrobial agents, this study critically evaluated the antimicrobial therapeutic potency of A. paniculata and its metabolites, focusing on the mechanism of action in inhibiting invasive microbes and biofilm formation. A critical evaluation of the secondary metabolites with the aim of identifying pure compounds that possess antimicrobial functions has further added significant values to this study. Notwithstanding that A. paniculata is a promising source of antimicrobial agents and safe treatment for IDs, further empirical research is warranted.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial agent; clinical trial; ethnopharmacology; infectious disease; medicinal plant; metabolites; natural products
Year: 2021 PMID: 33923529 PMCID: PMC8072717 DOI: 10.3390/life11040348
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Figure 1Andrographis paniculata and its different parts. (a) Aerial part, (b) flower, (c) pod stage with panicles: mature capsule, (d) fruit, (e) opened capsule, (f) roots, (g) leaves: opposite arrangement, (h) stem, and (i) seed. Bar = 1 cm. This figure is reproduced from a thesis of the first author of this article [77].
Figure 2Annual publication statistics on topics covering the A. paniculata and andrographolide from 2011 to 2020 (Scopus).
Figure 3Antimicrobial agents (pure compounds) of A. paniculata [39,176,192,193].
Isolated secondary metabolites of A. paniculata and their antimicrobial activity.
| No. | Name | Sources | Extraction | Analytical | Antimicrobial Potentiality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
|
| Andrographolide | AeP, L, R, WP | AW, E, H, M | HPLC, HPLC-MS, MECC, FIS, UPLC, HPLC-DAD | Antibacterial [ |
|
| Neoandrographolide | AeP, L, R, WP | AW, E, M | TLC | Anti-HSV-1 [ |
|
| Isoandrographolide | AeP, L, R, WP | AW, E, M | HPLC, TLC | Antibacterial [ |
|
| 14-deoxyandrographolide | AeP, L, WP | AW, E, H, M | HPLC, TLC | Antibacterial [ |
|
| 14-deoxy-11, 12-didehydroxiandrographolide | AeP, L, WP | E, H, M, DCM | HPLC, TLC | Antibacterial [ |
|
| 14-deoxy—11-oxo- | AeP, L | AW, M | SGC | Anti-Leishmaniasis [ |
|
| 3-O-β-D-glucosyl-14-deoxy- | AeP, WP | E, M | HPLC, TLC | Antibacterial [ |
|
| 14-Deoxy-12-hydroxy- | AeP | AW, M | HPLC, TLC | Antibacterial [ |
|
| 3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl- 14,19-dideoxyandrographolide | AeP | AW, M | HPLC, TLC | Antibacterial [ |
|
| 3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl- | AeP | AW, M | HPLC, TLC | Antibacterial [ |
|
| 8,17-Epoxy-14-deoxy-andrographolide | AeP | AW, M | HPLC, TLC | Antibacterial [ |
|
| 14-Deoxy-17-β-hydroxy- | AeP | AW, M | HPLC, TLC | Antibacterial [ |
|
| 19-O-[β-D-apiofuranosyl-β-D-glucopyranoyl]-3,14-dideoxy- | AeP | AW, M | HPLC, TLC | Antibacterial [ |
|
| Echiodinin | Callus | AW, M | TLC | Antibacterial [ |
|
| Andrograpanin | AeP, L | E, H | HPLC, TLC, SGC | Antibacterial [ |
|
| Andrographiside | WP | n-butanol | TLC | Antimalarial [ |
|
| |||||
|
| 1,2-Dihydroxy-6,8-dimethoxyxanthone | R | CF, M, PE, W | TLC | Antimalarial [ |
|
| 1,8-Dihydroxy-3,7-dimethoxyxanthone | R | CF, M, PE, W | TLC | Antimalarial [ |
|
| 3,7,8-Trimethoxy-1-hydroxyxanthone | R | CF, M, PE, W | TLC | Antimalarial [ |
|
| 4,8-Dihydroxy-2,7-dimethoxyxanthone | R | CF, M, PE, W | TLC | Antimalarial [ |
AeP: Aerial part, AW: Acetone-water, CF: Chloroform, CHIKV: Chikungunya Virus, DCM: Dichloromethane, E: Ethanol, H: Hexane, L: Leaves, M: Methanol. PE: Petroleum ether, R: Root, W: Water, WP: Whole plant, HSV: Herpes Simplex Virus, DVS: Dengue Virus Serotype, EBV: Epstein Barr virus, HPV: Human Papilloma Virus, MECC: micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography, FIS: flow injection spectrophotometry, TLC: Thin Layer Chromatography, HPLC: High-performance Liquid Chromatography, HPLC-DAD: HPLC with a diode-array detector, HPLC-MS: HPLC-Mass Spectrometry, UPLC: Ultra-performance Liquid Chromatography, SCG: Silica Gel Chromatography.
Figure 4Venn diagram shows antimicrobial pure metabolites source of part of A. paniculata. AeP: Aerial part, L: Leaves, R: Root, WP: Whole plant. * One metabolite (14) isolated from callus, which is not shown in the diagram.
Antibacterial activity of the different types of A. paniculata extracts.
|
| Extraction Methods | Assay | Number of Test MOs | Most Inhibited Mos | MEIC | ZOI (mm or %) | Remarks | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AeP | Chloroform | AWDM | 9 |
| 250 μg/mL | 35 | Seven out of 9 pathogens were inhibited that were comparable with antibiotic, amikacin | [ |
| L | Water | DDM | 5 | 2 µg/disc | 8 ± 0.1 | No activity against | [ | |
| L | 70% Methanol | Two-fold broth MDM | 10 | 31.5 mg/L | - | All the test MOs were inhibited | [ | |
| WP | DCM | DDM | 12 |
| 1000 µg/disc | 21.33 ± 1.53 | Gram-negative bacteria were more resistant. | [ |
| WP | Methanol |
| 1000 µg/disc | 24.00 ± 0.00 | No activity observed against | |||
| WP | Aqueous |
| 1000 µg/disc | 23.17 ± 0.76 | No activity was observed against | |||
| R | Hexane | Broth MDM | 4 |
| 100 mg/mL | 12 | Hexane and methanolic extracts were more efficient against all tested MOs | [ |
| R | Methanol | Broth MDM | 4 |
| 100 mg/mL | 12 | ||
| WP | Methanol | CPADM | 5 |
| 1000 μg/mL | 19.67 ± 0.76 | Gram-negative bacteria were more resistant to methanol extracts | [ |
| AeP | Ethanol | AWDM | 11 |
| 200 μg/mL | 14 | The ethanol extract was efficient | [ |
| L | Methanol | AWDM | 6 |
| 50 mg/mL | 24 ± 0.2 | Inhibit both Gram-positive and negative bacteria, but gram-negative bacteria are less susceptible | [ |
| WP | DCM | DDM | 10 |
| 1000 μg/disc | 20 ± 1.50 | Aqueous extracts were more effective compared to the DCM and methanol extracts | [ |
| Methanol |
| 1000 μg/disc | 22 ± 0.00 | |||||
| Aqueous |
| 1000 μg/disc | 23.17 ± 0.76 | |||||
| WP | Methanol | CPADM | 5 |
| 1000 μg/mL | 19.67 ± 0.76 | Effective against all test MOs | [ |
| L | Chloroform | AWDM | 6 |
| 22 ± 0.071 | Chloroform extract of leaves was more efficient to inhibit all tested MOs than other extracts | [ | |
| Aqueous | 6 |
| 12 ± 0.344 | |||||
| Acetone | 6 |
| 13 ± 0.416 | |||||
| Ethyl acetate | 6 |
| 15 ± 0.152 | |||||
| Petroleum ether |
| - | - | No inhibitory activity | ||||
| R | Chloroform | AWDM | 6 |
| 18 ± 0.055 | Chloroform extract of roots was more efficient to inhibit all tested MOs than other extracts | [ | |
| Aqueous |
| 14 ± 0.297 | ||||||
| Acetone |
| 15 ± 0.055 | ||||||
| Ethyl acetate |
| 10 ± 0.626 | ||||||
| DMSO |
| 14 ± 0.187 | ||||||
| Petroleum ether |
| - | - | No inhibitory activity | ||||
| S | Ethyl acetate | AWDM | 6 |
| 8 ± 0.303 | Chloroform extract of stems was more efficient to inhibit all tested MOs than other extracts | [ | |
| DMSO |
| 16 ± 0.332 | ||||||
| Acetone |
| 16 ± 0.374 | ||||||
| Chloroform |
| 24 ± 0.219 | ||||||
| Aqueous |
| 13 ± 0.373 | ||||||
| Petroleum ether |
| - | - | No inhibitory activity |
AeP: Aerial part, L: Leaves, R: Root, S: Stem/bark, WP: Whole plant, AWDM: Agar Well Dilution Method, CPADM: Cup-plate Agar Diffusion Method, DCM: Dichloromethane, DDM: Disc Diffusion Method, MEIC: Most Effective Inhibitory Concentration, DMSO: Dimethyl Sulfoxide, FA: Fluorogenic Assay, MDM: Microdilution Method, MOs: Microorganisms, NA: No activity, ZOI: Zone of Inhibition.
Figure 5Schematic representation of a plausible mechanism of actions of andrographolide in bacteria, mainly Staphylococcus aureus. AG: andrographolide (), the Black arrow (): regular process/pathway, Black dotted rectangle area: AG Induction of Salmonella-specific cell-mediated immune response in Salmonella typhimurum, Blue dotted rectangle area: AG inhibits cellular inflammatory factor in Propionibacterium acnes, COX-2: Cyclooxygenase-2, ENB: Enterotoxin B, FBP: Fibronectin-binding protein, Green dotted arrow (): expected regulation process, Green dotted arrow with a flat bottom (): attachment of AG to the target site, Green down arrow (): downregulation and expected outcomes, Green up arrow (): upregulation and expected outcomes, HaCaT: Human Epidermal Keratinocyte line, HLN: Hemolysin, IFN-γ: Interferon-gamma, IgG: Immunoglobulin G, IL-6: Interleukin 6, IL-8: Interleukin 8, NF-κB: Nuclear factor-kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cell, Orange dotted rectangle area: AG analogue influences the quorum sensing system and inhibits exopolysaccharides generation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. psl production is also significantly inhibited in this biofilm-forming bacteria, (): Phosphorylation, Purple dotted rectangle area: AG influences quorum sensing system and reduces the expression of F1 pili, P pili and Tsh by downregulating fimA, papC and tsh in Escherichia coli. All these virulence genes help bacteria to the adherence cell surface. The red arrow (): Inhibition/downregulation of the process, Red up arrow (): upregulation (at disease or infection stage), TNF-α: Tumor Necrosis Factor- alpha, TSST-1: Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin-1.
Figure 6Global distribution of controlled clinical trials of Andrographis paniculata. (This map indicates the location of clinical studies conducted and color intensity indicated the number of studies frequencies. One trial conducted by Sandborn, et al. [63] covered five countries: the USA, Canada, Germany, Romania, and Ukraine).
Study characteristics and treatment outcomes of controlled clinical trials of Andrographis paniculata in treating uncomplicated upper respiratory tract infections and viral diseases.
| Study ID; | Study Design | Gender & Age | Recruitment(n)/Analyzed(n) | Diagnosis | Study Medications | Daily Dosage (Duration) | Active | Salient Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thamlikitkul, et al. [ | R, DB | G: M&F | n = 152/142 | Pharyngotons- | AP dried leaves extract (250 or 500 mg/capsule) and paracetamol (325 mg/capsule) | 3 capsules 4 xD (7 d) | 6% of AND | There was NSD in the efficacy of relieving fever ( |
| Hancke, et al. [ | R, DBPC | G: M&F | n = 59/59 | Common cold | Monodrug | 1.2 g daily (4 d) | 4% of AND | AP extract attenuates the signs of a common cold significantly at day 4 after treatment which is not observed with the placebo ( |
| Caceres, et al. [ | R, DBPC | G: M&F | n = 107/107 | Healthy volunteer * | Monodrug | Daily 2 tablets, 5 d/w (3 m) | 5.6% of AND | After the third month of treatment, a significant decrease in common colds in the AP group was observed compared to the P group ( |
| Melchior, et al. [ | R, DBPC | G: M&F | n = 50/50 | Common cold | AP leaves hydroalcoholic extract (85 mg/tablet) | 4 tablets 3 xD (5 d) | AND & DAND | The total recovery rate was 67.5% and 36% in Kan Jang and placebo group, respectively ( |
| Melchior, et al. [ | R, DBPC | G: M&F | n = 47/46 | Uncomplicated | Combination of APE and AS extract (85 mg/tablet) | 3 tablets 4 xD (5–6 d) | 5.25 mg AND & DAND; 9.7 mg per tablet EB and EE | Much improvement in the patient’s overall symptoms cores in TrG was observed compared to P ( |
| Melchior, et al. [ | R, DBPC | G: M&F A: 18–55 y | n = 180/179 | Uncomplicated | Combination of APE and AS extract (85 mg/tablet) | 3 tablets 4 xD (5–6 d) | 55.25 mg AND & DAND; 9.7 mg per tablet EB and EE | The difference between TrG and P groups was significant for total diagnosis score ( |
| Caceres, et al. [ | R, DBPC | G: M&F A: 25–50 y | n = 208/158 | Common colds | APE (100 mg/tablet) | 4 tablets 3 xD (5 d) | 5% of total AND & DAND | On day 4 of treatment, the decrease in the intensity and duration of symptoms was highly significant between TrG and P groups ( |
| Gabrielian, et al. [ | PG, DBPC | G: M&F A: 15–64 y | n = 200/185 | Acute URTIs and sinusitis | Combination of APE and AS extract (85 mg/tablet) | 4 tablets 3 xD (5 d) | 5 mg AND & 10 mg per tablet | Headache, nasal, sore and dry throat, and general malaise showed the most significant improvement ( |
| Spasov, et al. [ | RC3PG | G: M&F A: 4–11 y | n = 133/133 | Uncomplicated | Combination of APE and AS extract (85 mg/tablet); Immunal drops: contain EP and ethanol (4:1) | A: 2 tablets 3 xD (10 d); B: 10 drops 3 xD (10 d);C: 500 mg paracetamol 3 xD (10 d) and othersℓ | 5.25 mg AND & DAND; 9.7 mg per tablet EB and EE | Compared with group B (Immunal), the AP extract group considerably improved the development of the disease and intensified children’s recovery with common colds. |
| Saxena, et al. [ | R, DBPC | G: M&F A: 18–60 y | n = 223/220 | Uncomplicated URTIs | KalmCold™ (dried AP leaves extract; formulated by mixing methanol and water extract) (100 mg/capsule) | 1 capsule 2 xD (5 d) | AND, IAND, NAND, AGN, | The intervention group showed 2.1 folds higher improvement in reducing URTI symptoms than the placebo group ( |
| Kulichenko, et al. [ | RPG | G: M&F A: 19–63 y | n = 540/540 | Influenza | AP: Combination of APE (88.8 mg) and AS (10 mg) extract (100 mg/tablet) | AP: 2 tablets 3 xD (3–5 d); | AP: 5.25 mg AND & DAND; 9.7 mg per tablet EB and EE;Ctr: amantadine | Kan Jang treated patients recovered (69.9%) very quickly and reduced the risk of post-influenza complications, while Ctr group recovered 32.2% only ( |
| Kulichenko, et al. [ | SRC | G: M&F A: 20–63 y | n = 66/66 | Influenza | AP: Combination of APE (88.8 mg) and AS (10 mg) extract (100 mg/tablet) | AP: 3 tablets 3 xD (5 d); | AP: 5.25 mg/tablet AND & DAND, EB and EE; Ctr: amantadine | AP extract significantly reduced clinical symptoms and sped up patients’ recovery, and significantly ( |
| Calabrese, et al. [ | NRCT | G: M&F A: 18 y and above | n = 18/17 | HIV | AND | 5, 10, 20 mg/kg BW 3 xD first 3 w, second 3 w and last 3 w, respectively | AND | A dose of 10 mg/kg andrographolide administration significantly ( |
| Chuthaputti, et al. [ | RCOL | G: M&F A: 3–15 y | n = 25/25 | Influenza | AP: Paracetamol and AP aerial part extract (400 mg/capsule); Ctr: Paracetamol (500 mg/tablet) | AP: 4 capsules 4 xD; Ctr: 2 tablets 4 xD (7 d) | 9% of AND, | The severity of cough, fatigue, and overall symptoms of the TrG were significantly lower than the Ctr group from Day 4 onwards. |
* To improve immunity and diminish the occurrence of common colds among the rural school children; A: Age; AGN: Andrograpanin; AND: Andrographolide; AP: Andrographis paniculata; APE: AP extract; AS: Acanthopanax senticosus; AS: Acanthopanax senticosus; BCS: Baseline characteristics; BP: Bacterial population; BW: Body weight; CR: Compliance rate; CrG: Control group; Ctr: Controlled; d: Day; DAND: Deoxyandrographolide; DAS: Dehydroandrographolide succinate; DBPC: Double-blind, placebo-controlled; DDHAND: 14-deoxy-11,12- didehydroandrographolide; EB: Eleutheroside B; EE: Eleutheroside E; ES: Echinacea purpurea; F: Female; G: Gender; Gr: Group; FMF: Familial Mediterranean Fever, HDG: High dose group; HV: Healthy volunteer; ImmunoGuard®: 370 mg, containing a fixed combination of AP special extract (50 mg) standardized for the content of andrographolide(3-[2-[-decahydro-6-hydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)-5,8a-dimethyl-2-methylene 1-naphthalenyl] ethyldiene] dihydro-4-hydroxy-2(3H)-furanone)–4 mg, Eleutherococcus senticosus special extract (10 mg) standardized for the content of Eleutherosid E (>0.8 mg), Schizandra chinensis special extract (100 mg) standardized for the content of Schisandrins (>0.8 mg), Glycyrrhiza glabra L extract (10 mg) standardized for the content of Glycyrrhizin (>0.6 mg), 190.3 mg microcristalline cellulose, 7.4 mg Syloid FP, 1.8 mg magnesium stearate, 0.8 mg shellac, 0.1 mg olive oil, and 0.07 mg Macrogol; IAND: Isoandrographolide; IV: Intravenous administration; LDG: Low dose group; M: Male; Mix: Mixture; m: Month; MWN: 7-O-methylwogonin; n: Sample size; NAND: Neoandrographolide; NRCT: Non-Randomized Controlled Trial; NSD: No significant difference; PG: Parallel-group; R: Randomized; R3WC: Randomized, three-way crossover; RC3PG: Randomized Controlled three parallel group; RCOL: randomized controlled open-label; RPG: Randomized Parallel-group; SCF: skullcapflavone I; Rt: Recruitment; SRC: Simple randomization via computer; STD: Standard treatment; STD€: mainly amantadine (antiviral agent) with ascorbic acid as an adjuvant. Each tablet contains 50 mg amantadine. 1st day– 2 tablets 3 xD, 2nd & 3rd day– 2 tablets 2 xD, 4th day– 2 tablets 1 xD; ℓ: standard treatment of lavish warm drinks, throat gargles, antiseptic nose drops, and paracetamol; TD: Treatment duration; TrG: Treatment group; URTIs: Upper respiratory tract infections; VO: Valeriana officinalis; w: Weeks; xD: times daily; Y: Year.
Figure 7Controlled clinical trials of Andrographis paniculata. Infectious diseases include uncomplicated upper respiratory infections (UTRI) (i.e., common cold, rhinitis, nasopharyngitis, pharyngitis, and pharyngotonsillitis) and viral diseases (i.e., influenza, HIV). FMF: Familial Mediterranean Fever; T2DM: Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Adverse events reported in the treatment of human subjects using A. paniculata for uncomplicated upper respiratory tract infections and viral diseases.
| Reference | Study Design | Recruitment(n)/Analyzed(n) | Diagnosis | Adverse Effects (Cases) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Placebo | ||||
| Thamlikitkul, et al. [ | R, DB | n = 152/142 | Pharyngotonsillitis | Minimal and self-limiting side effects (i.e., nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, dizziness, drowsiness, and malaise) were found about 20% in treatment (LDG & HDG) and paracetamol groups (9–11). | No placebo groups. |
| Hancke, et al. [ | R, DBPC | n = 59/59 | Common cold | No adverse event reported | No adverse event reported. |
| Caceres, et al. [ | R, DBPC | n = 107/107 | HV * | Not reported adverse effect information | Not reported adverse effect information |
| Melchior, et al. [ | R, DBPC | n = 50/50 | Common colds and sinusitis | Urticaria (2) | No adverse event reported. |
| Melchior, et al. [ | R, DBPC | n = 47/46 | Uncomplicated acute URTI | No adverse event information reported | No adverse event information reported |
| Melchior, et al. [ | R, DBPC | n = 180/179 | Uncomplicated acute URTI | Unpleasant sensations in the chest and intensified headache (1) | No adverse event reported. |
| Caceres, et al. [ | R, DBPC | n = 208/158 | Common colds | No adverse events were observed | No adverse event reported. |
| Gabrielian, et al. [ | PG, DBPC | n = 200/185 | URTIs and sinusitis | Increase in nasal discharge and epigastric pain (1), nose blocked (1), and severe headache (1). They were excluded from the analysis data. | No adverse event reported. |
| Spasov, et al. [ | RC3PG | n = 133/133 | Uncomplicated URTI | No side effects were observed | No placebo group |
| Saxena, et al. [ | R, DBPC | n = 223/220 | URTIs | Mild adverse effect; vomiting (1), epistaxis (1), Urticaria (1) and diarrhoea (3). Except for vomiting (patient in AP group) and urticaria, all other effects stopped spontaneously without any medication. | No adverse event reported. |
| Kulichenko, et al. [ | RPG | n = 540/540 | Influenza | AP group: Dry cough, rhinitis, and pain in the throat (22). Influenza complications were found in 30.1% of the AP group and 67.8% of the Ctr group ( | No placebo group |
| Kulichenko, et al. [ | SRC | n = 66/66 | Influenza | Influenza complications were found in 31.43% of AP-treated patients and 70.97% of STD€-treated patients ( | No placebo group |
| Calabrese, et al. [ | NRCT | n = 18/17 | HIV | Anaphylactic reaction (1). All but one (92%) reported at least one adverse event during the study. ¾ reported an adverse event by the healthy volunteer. All conditions were returned to normal by week 9. | No placebo group |
| Chuthaputti, et al. [ | RCOL | n = 25/25 | Influenza | No adverse event information reported. | No placebo group |
* To improve immunity and diminish the occurrence of common colds among the rural school children; AP: Andrographis paniculata; DBPC: Double-blind, placebo-controlled; HDG: High dose group; HV: Healthy volunteer; LDG: Low dose group; NRCT: Non-Randomized Controlled Trial; PG: Parallel group; R: Randomized; R3WC: Randomized, three-way crossover; RC3PG: Randomized Controlled three parallel-group; RCOL: randomized controlled open-label; RPG: Randomized Parallel-group; SRC: Simple randomization via computer; STD€: mainly amantadine (antiviral agent) with ascorbic acid as an adjuvant. Each tablet contains 50 mg amantadine; URTIs: Upper respiratory tract infections.