| Literature DB >> 33922058 |
Muhammad Majid Aziz1,2,3,4, Fatima Haider5, Muhammad Fawad Rasool6, Furqan Khurshid Hashmi7, Sadia Bahsir8, Pengchao Li1,2,3,4, Mingyue Zhao1,2,3,4, Thamir M Alshammary9, Yu Fang1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Community pharmacies are the main channel of antibiotics distribution. We aimed to analyze the dispensing of non-prescribed antibiotics and knowledge of pharmacy staff. We conducted a cross-sectional study in Punjab, Pakistan between December 2017 and March 2018. A self-administered, structured, pretested, and validated bilingual questionnaire was used, and we used chi-square tests in the statistical analysis. A total of 573 (91.7%) pharmacy retailers responded to the survey; 44.0% were aged 31-40 years and all were men. Approximately 81.5% of participants declared that dispensing non-prescribed antibiotics is a common practice in community pharmacies, and 51.1% considered themselves to be authorized to dispense these drugs; 69.3% believed this a contributing factor to antimicrobial resistance. Most (79.1%) respondents believed that this practice promotes irrational antibiotics use, and half (52.2%) considered antimicrobial resistance to be a public health issue. Only 34.5% of respondents reported recommending that patients consult with a doctor prior to using antibiotics, and 61.8% perceived that their dispensing practices reduce patients' economic burden. Approximately 44.9% of pharmacy retailers stated that they have proper knowledge about antibiotics use. Nitroimidazole was the main class of antibiotic dispensed without a prescription. Dispensing of injectable and broad-spectrum antibiotics can be potential threat for infection cure. Poor knowledge of staff is associated with dispensing of non-prescribed antibiotics. This inappropriate practice must be addressed immediately.Entities:
Keywords: antibiotics; attitude; community pharmacies; dispensing; knowledge; non-prescribed; practices
Year: 2021 PMID: 33922058 PMCID: PMC8143445 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10050482
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6382
Characteristics of study participants.
| Characteristics | Range/Groups | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (Years) | 30 or below | 159 (27.7) |
| 31–40 | 252 (44.0) | |
| 41–50 | 137 (23.9) | |
| 51 or above | 25 (4.4) | |
| Mean age ± SD = 34.9 ± 2.6 | ||
| Gender | Male | 573 (100.0) |
| Female | 0 (0.0) | |
| Education | Formal education | 467 (81.5) |
| Professional education | 106 (18.5) | |
| Experience (Years) | 5–10 | 279 (48.7) |
| 11–15 | 222 (38.7) | |
| More than 15 | 72 (12.6) | |
| Status in pharmacy | Employee | 294 (51.3) |
| Manager | 41 (7.2) | |
| Proprietor | 238 (41.5) | |
| Prescriptions (all types of medicines) per day | Less or 50 | 314 (54.8) |
| 51–100 | 176 (30.7) | |
| More than 100 | 83 (14.5) | |
| Total antibiotics dispensed per day(Prescribed + Non prescribed) | Less or 20 | 287 (50.1) |
| 21–40 | 197 (34.4) | |
| More than 40 | 89 (15.5) | |
| DoNA per day | Less or 10 | 273 (47.7) |
| 11–20 | 199 (34.7) | |
| More than 20 | 101 (17.6) | |
Knowledge and attitude of participants about DoNA.
| Measures | Yes | No | Don’t Know |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community pharmacies in Pakistan are authorized for DoNA | 293 (51.1) | 109 (19.1) | 171(29.8) |
| DoNA from community pharmacies of Pakistan is common practice | 467 (81.5) | 22(3.8) | 84(14.7) |
| Dispensing of PoM without prescription causes health issues | 212 (37.0) | 289 (50.4) | 72(12.6) |
| DoNA contributes to the development of AMR | 397 (69.3) | 128 (22.3) | 48(8.4) |
| AMR has become a challenging issue of public health | 299 (52.2) | 115 (20.1) | 159(27.7) |
| DoNA is a cause of irrational use of antibiotics by patients | 453 (79.1) | 104 (18.1) | 16(2.8) |
| Pharmacy retailers should stop DoNA | 318 (55.5) | 222 (38.7) | 33(5.8) |
| I recommend doctor’s consultation to the patients before use of any antibiotic | 198 (34.5) | 375 (65.4) | __________ * |
| On my refusal to DoNA, patient will try to get antibiotics from another pharmacy | 503 (87.8) | 62(10.8) | 8(1.4) |
| DoNA reduces the economic burden of patients | 354 (61.8) | 88 (15.4) | 131(22.8) |
* Question according to its nature includes only two answering options: Yes or No.
Dispensing of non-prescribed antibiotics.
| Measures | Items | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Reasons for DoNA | Pharmacy retailers have proper knowledge about use of antibiotics | 257 (44.9) |
| Patients visit physicians only for serious infections | 317 (55.3) | |
| Increases the profit and sales | 97 (16.9) | |
| Lack of patients’ affordability for consultation fee of doctors | 366 (63.9) | |
| Fear of customer loss | 93 (16.2) | |
| Unawareness of pharmacy staff toward policy and regulations | 107 (18.7) | |
| Classes of commonly dispensed non prescribed antibiotic | Nitroimidazole | 411 (71.7) |
| Penicillins | 382 (66.7) | |
| Quinolones | 337 (58.8) | |
| Cephalosporins | 207 (36.1) | |
| Tetracycline | 116 (20.2) | |
| Macrolides | 91 (15.9) | |
| Administration form of commonly dispensed non prescribed antibiotic | Oral | 462 (80.6) |
| Topical cream/ointment | 294 (51.3) | |
| Ophthalmic ointment/drops | 271 (47.3) | |
| Ear drops | 211 (36.8) | |
| Parenteral/Injectables | 17 (2.9) |
Figure 1Diseases mentioned by participants for which non prescribed antibiotic are dispensed.
Association between DoNA practices and characteristics of participants.
| Measures | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Age | Education | |
| Before DoNA, I inquire thedrug allergies to patients | 3.7 ± 0.10 | 0.050 | 0.572 |
| Before DoNA, I inquire about the renal condition of patients | 2.5 ± 0.06 | 0.048 | 0.162 |
| Before DoNA, I ask the patient about other disease/s or therapies | 4.9 ± 0.13 | 0.573 | 0.201 |
| At the time of DoNA, I inform the patients about possible side effects | 3.0 ± 0.08 | 0.047 | 0.411 |
| At the time of DoNA, I counsel the patients for medication adherence and compliance | 5.2 ± 0.14 | 0.172 | 0.070 |
| I don’t dispense non-prescribed antibiotics for children | 2.7 ± 0.07 | 0.701 | 0.090 |
| I don’t dispense non-prescribed antibiotics for pregnant women | 3.0 ± 0.08 | 0.849 | 0.385 |
p-values < 0.05 = statistically significant; Mean value and score weighting from 6-point Likert scale (1 = never, 2 = very rarely, 3 = rarely, 4 = some time, 5 = very often, 6 = always).
Suggestions from participants to halt DoNA.
| Measures | Items | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|---|
| To control DoNA from community pharmacies | Pharmacy retailers should penalized | 92 (16.1) |
| Vigilance of pharmacies by drug inspectors should be more strong | 78 (13.6) | |
| Pharmacy retailers need continuous trainings | 397 (69.2) | |
| Other e.g., reduction ofdoctors’ consultation fee, increase in free health facilities | 17 (2.9) | |
| Role of pharmacy retailers to halt DoNA | Educate patients about the outcome and AMR due DoNA | 458 (79.9) |
| Educate and train the staff of pharmacy about the outcome and AMR due DoNA | 347 (60.6) | |
| Arranging awareness seminars in Chemist and Druggist Associations’ meetings | 272 (47.5) | |
| Arrange public awareness campaigns | 167 (29.1) |