| Literature DB >> 33921988 |
Salam A Ibrahim1, Hafize Fidan2, Sulaiman O Aljaloud3, Stanko Stankov2, Galin Ivanov4.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the possibilities for using date fruit from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in the formulation of a novel snack bar while replacing the used honey with date paste. The technological, textural, microbiological and sensory qualities of the obtained food products were evaluated during storage for 12 days after their production. Date palm fruit in the form of date paste was used as an ingredient in the composition of the new snack bars that also included nuts and dried fruits. Five formulations were prepared: a control bar, snack bar with 40% date paste, snack bar with 50% date paste, snack bar with 60% date paste, and snack bar with 70% dates paste. The resulting date paste's textural characteristics supported the bonding potential of the food system and gave a sweet taste to the final product. The formulations containing 50% date paste presented the highest overall acceptability and were the formulation with the best sensory characteristics. Thus, the addition of date paste in snack bars would be a good option to develop a functional product that contributes to rational nutrition principles. The obtained values in the current study confirmed the technological and functional potential of date fruit as a product that can find adequate application in the composition of foods with functional properties.Entities:
Keywords: date fruit; energy bars; paste; sensory; texture
Year: 2021 PMID: 33921988 PMCID: PMC8143459 DOI: 10.3390/foods10050918
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Production of novel snack bars with date palm.
Figure 2Snack bars with (a) control sample; (b) 40% date paste; (c) 50% date paste; (d) 60% date paste; (e) 70% date paste.
Date bar formulations.
| Ingredients | Control Sample | Date Bar with (%) Dates | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | ||
| Cashews, % | 20.00 | 20.00 | 16.66 | 13.33 | 10.00 |
| Oatmeal, % | 20.00 | 20.00 | 16.66 | 13.33 | 10.00 |
| Dried cherries % | 20.00 | 20.00 | 16.66 | 13.33 | 10.00 |
| Honey, % | 40.00 | - | - | - | - |
| Dates, % | - | 40.00 | 50.00 | 60.00 | 70.00 |
Figure 3Changes in the water activity values of five snack bar samples during 12 days of storage.
Figure 4Changes in the hardness of five snack bar samples during 12-day storage.
Nutritional facts about the samples of snack bars with date fruit.
| Nutritional Facts | Date Bar with (%) Dates | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control Sample | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | |
| Energy, kcal | 378.80 | 372.00 | 362.08 | 352.29 | 342.50 |
|
| |||||
| Protein, g | 7.82 | 8.94 | 7.94 | 6.93 | 5.93 |
| Fat, g | 10.16 | 10.35 | 8.70 | 7.05 | 5.41 |
| Carbohydrate, g | 68.76 | 65.68 | 67.10 | 68.55 | 70.00 |
| —Fibre, g | 3.76 | 6.88 | 7.07 | 7.25 | 7.44 |
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| Thiamin, mg | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.16 |
| Riboflavin, mg | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.07 |
| Niacin, mg | 0.46 | 0.92 | 0.98 | 1.04 | 1.10 |
| Pyridoxine, mg | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| Folate, μg | 16.60 | 16.20 | 13.49 | 10.80 | 8.10 |
| Pantothenic Acid, mg | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.36 | 0.29 | 0.22 |
|
| |||||
| Calcium, mg | 29.70 | 102.10 | 116.24 | 130.40 | 144.55 |
| Iron, mg | 2.58 | 2.82 | 2.52 | 2.22 | 1.92 |
| Magnesium, mg | 94.60 | 153.80 | 153.14 | 152.52 | 151.90 |
| Phosphorus, mg | 224.8 | 234.00 | 199.43 | 164.96 | 130.50 |
| Potassium, mg | 238.60 | 408.32 | 419.58 | 430.94 | 442.31 |
| Sodium, mg | 4.40 | 5.80 | 6.08 | 6.37 | 6.65 |
| Zinc, mg | 2.04 | 2.07 | 1.77 | 1.48 | 1.18 |
| Copper, mg | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.50 | 0.43 |
| Manganese, mg | 1.34 | 18.51 | 22.59 | 26.67 | 30.76 |
| Selenium, μg | 4.30 | 5.18 | 4.81 | 4.45 | 4.09 |
Sensory characteristics of snack bar samples.
| Sensory Characteristics 1 | Date Bar with (%) Dates | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control Sample | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | |
| Overall acceptability | 6.68 a ± 0.98 | 5.08 b ± 1.95 | 7.16 c ± 1.21 | 4.44 d ± 0.65 | 2.52 e ± 1.00 |
| Appearance | 5.92 a ± 0.95 | 5.88 a ± 1.05 | 7.28 b ± 0.89 | 6.96 c ± 0.93 | 6.36 d ± 1.07 |
| Flavor | 7.20 a ± 1.04 | 6.6 a ± 1.29 | 8.24 b ± 0.78 | 5.68 c ± 0.63 | 5.80 d ± 0.81 |
| Sweetness | 6.92 a ± 1.18 | 6.84 a ± 0.74 | 8.4 b ± 0.64 | 6.72 c ± 0.61 | 6.12 d ± 0.78 |
| Texture | 6.32 a ± 0.91 | 6.24 a ± 1.09 | 7.12 b ± 0.92 | 6.44 c ± 0.96 | 6.64 d ± 0.81 |
Data are presented as means ± SD (standard deviation). a–e Means in a row not sharing the same capital superscript letter are significantly different at (p < 0.05, Tukey’s HSD test).