Literature DB >> 2915095

Calculating the nutrient composition of recipes with computers.

P M Powers1, L W Hoover.   

Abstract

The objective of this research project was to compare the nutrient values computed by four commonly used computerized recipe calculation methods. The four methods compared were the yield factor, retention factor, summing, and simplified retention factor methods. Two versions of the summing method were modeled. Four pork entrée recipes were selected for analysis: roast pork, pork and noodle casserole, pan-broiled pork chops, and pork chops with vegetables. Assumptions were made about changes expected to occur in the ingredients during preparation and cooking. Models were designed to simulate the algorithms of the calculation methods using a microcomputer spreadsheet software package. Identical results were generated in the yield factor, retention factor, and summing-cooked models for roast pork. The retention factor and summing-cooked models also produced identical results for the recipe for pan-broiled pork chops. The summing-raw model gave the highest value for water in all four recipes and the lowest values for most of the other nutrients. A superior method or methods was not identified. However, on the basis of the capabilities provided with the yield factor and retention factor methods, more serious consideration of these two methods is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2915095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  4 in total

1.  Application of Date (Phoenix dactylifera L.) Fruit in the Composition of a Novel Snack Bar.

Authors:  Salam A Ibrahim; Hafize Fidan; Sulaiman O Aljaloud; Stanko Stankov; Galin Ivanov
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-04-22

2.  Food Composition Databases: Considerations about Complex Food Matrices.

Authors:  Stefania Marconi; Alessandra Durazzo; Emanuela Camilli; Silvia Lisciani; Paolo Gabrielli; Altero Aguzzi; Loretta Gambelli; Massimo Lucarini; Luisa Marletta
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2018-01-01

3.  Comparison of Nutrient Estimates Based on Food Volume versus Weight: Implications for Dietary Assessment Methods.

Authors:  Emma K Partridge; Marian L Neuhouser; Kara Breymeyer; Jeannette M Schenk
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  High glycemic index and glycemic load diets as risk factors for insomnia: analyses from the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  James E Gangwisch; Lauren Hale; Marie-Pierre St-Onge; Lydia Choi; Erin S LeBlanc; Dolores Malaspina; Mark G Opler; Aladdin H Shadyab; James M Shikany; Linda Snetselaar; Oleg Zaslavsky; Dorothy Lane
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 7.045

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.