| Literature DB >> 33921827 |
Fatma Bassyouni1, Mohammad Tarek2, Abeer Salama3, Bassant Ibrahim3, Sawsan Salah El Dine3, Nemat Yassin3, Amina Hassanein4, Maysa Moharam5, Mohamed Abdel-Rehim6.
Abstract
Diabetes is the most common metabolic disorder in both developing and non-developing countries, and a well-recognized global health problem. The WHO anticipates an increase in cases from 171 million in 2000 to 366 million by 2030. In the present study, we focus on the preparation of pyrimidine derivatives as potential antidiabetic and antimicrobial agents. Thein vivoeffect on total serum glucose concentration, cholesterol and antioxidant activity was assessed in adult male albino Wister rats and compared to the reference drug glimperide. Promising results were observed for compound 5. The histopathological study confirms that compound 5 results in significant activity with liver maintenance. The antimicrobial activities were evaluated against several bacterial strains such as Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 25566, Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli NRRN 3008, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 10145, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538and fungi such as Rhizopus oligosporus, Mucor miehei and Asperillus niger. Compounds 4 and 5 showed a good inhibition of the bacterial zone compared to the reference drug cephradine. Finally, we suggest protein targets for these drugs based on computational analysis, and infer their activities from their predicted modes of binding using molecular modeling. The molecular modeling for compounds 4 and 5 resulted in improved docking scores and hydrogen bonding. The docking studies are in good agreement with the in vitro and in vivo studies.Entities:
Keywords: antidiabetic activity; antimicrobial activity; histopathological study; molecular modeling; pyrimidine derivatives
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33921827 PMCID: PMC8072832 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26082370
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Available marketed antidiabetic and antibacterial drugs containing pyrimidine derivatives.
Scheme 1Synthesis of thiazolopyrimidine derivatives 4 and 5.
Effects of compounds 4 and 5 on glucose level, total antioxidant capacity and alpha amylase level in serum of STZ diabetic rats.
| Groups | Glucose Level | Total Antioxidant Capacity | α-Amylase Level (U/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 119.1 ± 5.83 | 4.96 ± 0.04 | 104.5 ± 1.569 |
|
| 408.3 ± 36.32 a | 4.65 ± 0.01 a | 317.4 ± 12.86 a |
|
| 121.5 ± 11.31 b | 5.65 ± 0.07 a,b | 140.2 ± 10.6 a,b |
|
| 122.4 ± 3.2 b | 4.69 ± 0.004 a | 117.6 ± 1.51 a,b |
|
| 116.5 ± 7.2 b | 4.76 ± 0.01 a | 78.41 ± 1.04 a,b |
The results are expressed as mean + SEM. The means were compared using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by several comparative tests by Tukey Kramer. N = 8, p < 0.05. a Significantly different from negative control group, b Significantly different from the positive control group.
Effects of compounds 4 and 5 on the serum lipid profile of STZ diabetic rats.
| Groups | Total Cholesterol (TC) Level | High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) Level |
|---|---|---|
|
| 238.7 ± 3.92 | 385 ± 4.35 |
|
| 241.26 ± 7.97 | 200.75 ± 5.5 a |
|
| 237.47 ± 2.56 | 341.83 ± 0.34 a,b |
|
| 244.6 ± 3.87 | 511.78 ± 24.21 a,b |
|
| 244.27 ± 3.03 | 491.98 ± 17.37 a,b |
The results are expressed as mean + SEM. The means were compared using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by several comparative tests by Tukey Kramer. N = 8, p < 0.05. a Significant different from the negative control group, b Significantly different from the positive control group.
Figure 2(A). Kidney tissue of control rat showing ordinary averagely cellular glomerulus (thin black arrow) amidst ordinary renal tubules, with low cuboidal epithelial lining and patent lumina. (B). Kidney tissue of diabetic untreated rat showing degenerated hypocellular glomeruli (thin black arrows) with congestion within interstitial tissue. Thick walled blood vessels were noticed. (C). Kidney tissue of diabetic untreated rat showing degenerated hypocellular glomerulus (white arrow) with adjacent renal tubules showing cloudy swelling (thin black arrows) within lining epithelium. (D). Kidney tissue of diabetic untreated rat showed renal tubules with vacuolar degeneration (white arrow) within lining epithelium. Other tubules showed atrophic lining (thin black arrow). Interstitial hemorrhages were observed. (E). Diabetic rat treated with reference drug showed improved glomerulus as regards cellularity (thin black arrow) with adjacent renal tubules; approximating control (white arrow). (F). Renal tissue of diabetic rat treated with compound (4) showing markedly improved glomerulus (thin black arrow) and the renal tubules (white arrow); the picture approximated control (H&E ×400).
Figure 3(A) Kidney tissue of control rat showing ordinary glomeruli (thin black arrow) with average cellularity and preserved lobular architecture. (B) Kidney tissue of diabetic untreated rat showing markedly degenerated, hypocellular, atrophic glomeruli (white arrows). (C) Kidney tissue of diabetic untreated rat showing vacuolar degeneration within epit helium lining renal tubules (thin black arrows). (D) Kidney tissue of diabetic rat treated with reference drug showing marked improvement within glomeruli, with restored cellularity and architecture (thin black arrows); approximating control. (E) Diabetic rat treated with compound 5 showing improvement within glomerular cellularity and lobulations (white arrow). (F) Kidney tissue of diabetic rat treated with compound 5 showed improvement within renal tubules; being lined by intact low cuboidal epithelium with patent lumina (thin black arrow). (H&E ×400).
Figure 4(A). Liver tissue of control rat showing preserved architecture with cords of linehepatocytes radiating from it with intervening sinusoids (H&E × 400). (B). Liver tissue of diabetic untreated rat showing marked dilatation and congestion of central vein (thin black arrow) (H&E ×100). (C). Liver tissue of diabetic untreated rat showing micro vesicular vacuolar degeneration (thin black arrows) within hepatocytes (H&E ×400). (D). Liver tissue of diabeticun treated rat showing widely dilated central vein, with perivascular fibrosis and aggregates of inflammatory cellsat periperhy (white arrow) (H&E ×400). (E). Liver tissue of diabetic rat treated with reference drug showing preserved architecture and ordinary hepatocytes; with residual, focal, mild micro vesicular degeneration (thin black arrow (H&E ×400). (F). Liver tissue of diabetic rat was treated with compound (4) showing marked improvement, preserved architecture and hepatocytes approximating ordinary ones; with residual, focal, very mild micro vesicular degeneration (thin black arrow) (H&E ×400).
Figure 5(A). Liver tissue of control rat showing cords of ordinary hepatocytes with sinusoids in between. (B). Liver tissue of diabetic untreated rat showing marked vacuolar and hydropic degeneration (white arrows) within hepatocytes with focal oedema (thin black arrow). (C). Liver tissue of diabetic rat treated with reference drug showing preserved architecture with ordinary hepatocytes showing minimal residual micro vesicular degeneration (thin black arrow S). (D). Liver tissue of diabetic rat treated with (compound 5) showing hepatocytes with hydropic degeneration (thin black arrow). (H&E ×400).
The anti-bacterial and antifungal activities of the tested compounds 4 and 5.
| Inhibition Zone Diameter mm/mg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microorganism | Gram Strain | Compound 4 | Compound 5 | Reference |
|
| positive | 10 | 13 | 30 |
|
| negative | 8 | 10 | 15 |
|
| negative | 10 | 12 | 20 |
|
| positive | 10 | 10 | 30 |
|
| negative | 9 | 10 | 15 |
|
| yeast | 19 | 25 | 35 |
|
| fungus | 12 | 15 | 25 |
|
| fungus | 10 | 10 | 28 |
|
| fungus | 10 | 10 | 25 |
Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) for the highest clear zones of the compound 5 against E.coli, Salmonella, and Aspergillus niger.
| Microorganism | Clear Zone of Compound 5 Concentration (µL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 µL | 10 µL | 15 µL | 20 µL | |
|
| 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
|
| 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
|
| 10 | 15 | 17 | 15 |
AutodockVina’s flexible docking scores for docking runs of synthesized compounds 4 and 5 and native against each of the three targets AMPC, CYP51 and DPP-IV.
| Compound | AMPC | CYP51 | DPP-IV |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | −7.7 | −7.3 | −8.2 |
| 5 | −7.2 | −7.2 | −8.2 |
| Native ligand | −6.5 | −10.7 | −8.0 |
Figure 6The binding states (a) is showing hydrogen bonds residues coloredin cyan and 2D interaction diagrams (b) for the compounds 4, 5 and the native ligand (3-[(4-chloroanilino) sulfonyl] thiophene-2-carboxylic acid) in co-crystalized state ligand (green) and docked state (magenta) against β-lactamase (AMPC) from PDB (1L2S).
The docking poses analysis of interaction complexes using PLIP of synthesized compounds 4 and 5 as well as native ligands against each of the three targets AMPC, CYP51 and DPP-IV.
| Compound | AMPC | CYP51 | DPP-IV |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Hydrogen bonds (Asp123, Ser212, Tyr221) π-Stacking | Hydrogen bonds (Glu444, Ser453, Arg469) Salt bridge (Glu473) with tertamine group | Hydrogen bonds (Glu347, Ser376) |
|
| Hydrogen bonds (Ala194, Arg296, Asn346) | Hydrophobic (Leu461), Hydrogen bonds (Ser438), Ser453, Gly455 | Hydrogen bonds (Ser376, Glu378) |
|
| [3-[(4-chloroanilino)sulfonyl]thiophene-2-carboxylic acid] | Composite ligand consists of Heme and (VT-1161) | (Sitagliptin) |
Figure 7The binding states (a) is showing hydrogen bonds residues coloredin cyan and 2D interaction diagrams (b) for the compounds 4, 5 and the candidate VT-1161 based on the native ligand (VT1) in co-crystalized state ligand (green) and docked state (magenta) against sterol 14-α-demethylase (CYP51) from Candida albicans, obtained from the PDB structure (5TZ1).
Figure 8The binding states (a) shows hydrogen bonds residues coloredin cyan and 2D interaction diagrams (b) for the compounds 4 and 5 and sitagliptin in co-crystallized stateligand (green) and docked state (magenta) against human dipeptidyl peptidase IV obtained from the PDB structure (1 × 70).