| Literature DB >> 33921071 |
Liliam K Harada1, Waldemar Bonventi Júnior2, Erica C Silva1, Thais J Oliveira1, Fernanda C Moreli1, José M Oliveira Júnior1, Matthieu Tubino3, Marta M D C Vila1, Victor M Balcão1,4.
Abstract
During the last decennium, it has become widely accepted that ubiquitous bacterial viruses, orEntities:
Keywords: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; bacterial biosensing; bacteriophage particles; bio-reactive polymeric matrix; chromogenic/bioluminescent bio-hydrogel; immobilization and structural/functional stabilization
Year: 2021 PMID: 33921071 PMCID: PMC8071457 DOI: 10.3390/bios11040124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosensors (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6374
Final compositions of the bacterial bio-detection systems encompassing calcium alginate biopolymeric matrices containing entrapped phage particles.
| Component | Bio-Detection System I | Bio-Detection System II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formulation 1 | Formulation 2 | Formulation 3 | Formulation 4 | Formulation 5 | |
| Phage cocktail | 0.0045; 0.045 (45 µL) | 0.0045; 0.045 (45 µL) | 0.0045; 0.045 (45 µL) | 0.050; 0.150 (150 µL) | 0.050; 0.150 (150 µL) |
| Methylparaben | 0.000966; 0.0966 | 0.000968; 0.0968 | 0.000969; 0.0969 | 0.0010; 0.0300 | 0.0010; 0.0300 |
| Sodium alginate | 1.50; 150 | 1.50; 150 | 1.50; 150 | 1.50; 45.00 | 1.50; 45.00 |
| CaCO3 22.5 mM | 0.2250; 22.50 | 0.2250; 22.50 | 0.2250; 22.50 | 0.2233; 6.700 | 0.2233; 6.700 |
| GDL 48 mM | 0.8600; 86.00 | 0.8600; 86.00 | 0.8600; 86.00 | 0.8600; 25.80 | 0.8600; 25.80 |
| Casein | 0.1000; 10.0 | 0.0500; 5.00 | 0.0100; 1.00 | - | - |
| Gelatin | 0.1000; 10.0 | 0.0500; 5.00 | 0.0100; 1.00 | - | - |
| Sodium 1,2-naftoquinone-4-sulfonate | 0.1300; 13.0 | 0.0130; 1.30 | 0.0100; 1.00 | - | - |
| Luciferin | - | - | - | 0.1667; 5.00 | 0.1667; 5.00 |
| Luciferase | - | - | - | 0.1667; 5.00 | 0.3333; 10.0 |
| ADP | - | - | - | 0.00006667; 0.002 | 0.0003333; 0.010 |
| Mg2+ | - | - | - | 0.00006667; 0.002 | 0.0006667; 0.020 |
| Ultrapure water | 97.08; 9708 | 97.30; 9730 | 97.38; 9738 | 97.10; 2913 | 96.93; 2908 |
| TOTAL | 100; 10000 | 100; 10000 | 100; 10000 | 100; 3000 | 100; 3000 |
Figure 1Bio-detection system I, consisting of a six-well culture plate within which the chromogenic formulations integrating a cocktail of phage particles and sodium 1,2-naftoquinone-4-sulfonate together with specific amounts of gelatin and casein were poured and allowed to polymerize.
Figure 2Bio-detection system II, consisting of a small cylindrical equipment machined in rigid white PVC, having approximately 6 cm in height and 6 cm in diameter, divided into a lower part (A) where the bio-reactive hydrogel integrating the immobilized phage cocktail, luciferin, luciferase, ADP (adenosine 5′-diphosphate sodium salt), and Mg2+ is housed, and an upper part (B) housing the light sensors, which was used to cover (A). The heart of the system designed consisted of a receptacle for the biopolymeric matrix containing the phage cocktail, above which the light sensors were attached and connected to an Arduino platform, which, in turn, was connected via a USB port to a notebook computer.
Figure 3Results obtained following evaluation of the lytic activity of the isolated phage particles ph0031, ph0034, and ph0041, and a comparison with the lytic activity of phage JG004 obtained from the DSMZ collection (a) and of the lytic activity of the phage cocktail produced with the three isolated phage particles (b) on a P. aeruginosa DSM19880 bacterial lawn.
Figure 4Results from evaluation of the lytic activity of the immobilized phages following integration within the bio-reactive polymeric matrix with concomitant structural and functional stabilization. (a) Bio-reactive polymeric matrix devoid of phage particles. (b) Bio-reactive polymeric matrix integrating the cocktail of phage particles.
Figure 5DESEM (dispersive-energy scanning electron microscopy) photomicrographs of the bioluminescent/chromogenic hydrogel surface ((a) ×50, (b) ×250, and of the cross-section fracture zone (c) ×250).
Figure 6Images obtained by X-ray tomographic analyses of the bioluminescent/chromogenic hydrogel, being (a) a leaning surface view allowing us to observe the top side (right thicker surface in green), and (b) a leaning surface view allowing us to observe the bottom side (left thin surface in green).
Results obtained from the X-ray tomographic analyses performed to the bioluminescent/chromogenic hydrogel.
| Parameter | Bioluminescent/Chromogenic Hydrogel Morphological Analysis | |
|---|---|---|
| Bi-Dimensional (2D) | Three-Dimensional (3D) | |
| Number of layers | - | 101.000 |
| Pixel size (µm) | 9.7610 | 9.7610 |
| Total VOI (volume of interest), TV (mm3) | 6.8340 | 6.8292 |
| Object volume, Obj.V (mm3) | 3.55432 | 3.4115 |
| Percent object volume, Obj.V/TV (%) | 52.0094 | 49.9542 |
| Total VOI surface, TS (mm2) | 28.2910 | 27.6702 |
| Object surface, Obj.S (mm2) | 432.0516 | 377.5217 |
| Intersection surface, i.S (mm2) | - | 7.5075 |
| Object surface/volume ratio, Obj.S/Obj.V (mm−1) | 121.5566 | 110.6616 |
| Cross-sectional thickness, Cs.Th (mm) | 0.02533 | - |
| Object surface density, Obj.S/TV (mm−1) | - | 55.2802 |
| Degree of anisotropy, DA | - | 3.2631 (0.6936) |
| Eigenvalue 1 | - | 3.5861 |
| Eigenvalue 2 | - | 6.5491 |
| Eigenvalue 3 | - | 11.7020 |
| Number of closed pores, Po.N(cl) | - | 5125 |
| Volume of closed pores, Po.V(cl) (mm3) | - | 0.00472 |
| Surface of closed pores, Po.S(cl) (mm2) | - | 2.7836 |
| Closed porosity (percent), Po(cl) (%) | 6.8883 | 0.1383 |
| Mean fragmentation index, Fr.I (mm−1) | −58.7603 | −71.3382 |
| Mean fractal dimension, FD | 1.7048 | 2.6834 |
| Volume of open pore space, Po.V(op) (mm3) | - | 3.4130 |
| Open porosity (percent), Po(op) (%) | - | 49.9766 |
| Total volume of pore space, Po.V(tot) (mm3) | - | 3.4178 |
| Total porosity (percent), Po(tot) (%) | - | 50.0458 |
| Euler number, Eu.N | - | −72,773.000 |
| Connectivity, Conn | - | 83,998.000 |
| Connectivity density, Conn.Dn (mm−3) | - | 12,299.7496 |
Figure 7Results obtained in the optimization of the amounts of phage particles, sodium 1,2-naftoquinone-4-sulfonate, gelatin, and casein, leading to the bio-reactive chromogel for bio-detection system I, displaying the time evolution of the color produced using a fixed (added) amount of P. aeruginosa cells. The composition of formulations 1, 2, and 3 is displayed in Table 1.
Figure 8Normalized integrated color density of the three chromogels containing phage particles, sodium 1,2-naftoquinone-4-sulfonate, gelatin, and casein, further contacted with a fixed amount of P. aeruginosa cells, throughout the bioreaction time, allowing us to select an optimized bio-reactive chromogel. Values represent the mean of three independent assays. Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Figure 9Results obtained using the selected bio-reactive chromogel with optimized concentrations of phage particles, sodium 1,2-naftoquinone-4-sulfonate, gelatin, and casein, in bio-detection system II, with evolution throughout the time of the color produced using variable added amounts of P. aeruginosa cells. As a control for the colorimetric bioreaction, cells of S. aureus CCCD-S009 were also contacted with the selected bio-reactive chromogel (Figure 9, bottom right).
Figure 10Normalized integrated color density of the optimized bio-reactive chromogel integrating phage particles, sodium 1,2-naftoquinone-4-sulfonate, gelatin, and casein, further added with variable amounts of P. aeruginosa cells, throughout the bioreaction time. Cells of S. aureus CCCD-S009 were used as a control for the bio-detection assays. Values represent the mean of three independent assays. Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Figure 11Receptacle for the bio-reactive hydrogel in bio-detection system II, showing the position of the two light sensors (a), macroscopic aspect of the freshly-prepared phage-containing bio-reactive hydrogel (b), and macroscopic aspect of the phage-containing bio-reactive hydrogel with produced bioluminescence following exposure to P. aeruginosa cells (c).
Figure 12Evolution of the normalized LDR (Light-Dependent Resistor) signal throughout the bioreaction timeframe, using the bioluminescent hydrogel in bio-detection system II.
Figure 13Evolution of the normalized solid-state photosensor signal throughout the bioreaction timeframe using the bioluminescent hydrogel in bio-detection system II.