Literature DB >> 33920907

The Impact of Shape-Based Cue Discriminability on Attentional Performance.

Olga Lukashova-Sanz1, Siegfried Wahl1,2, Thomas S A Wallis3, Katharina Rifai1,2.   

Abstract

With rapidly developing technology, visual cues became a powerful tool for deliberate guiding of attention and affecting human performance. Using cues to manipulate attention introduces a trade-off between increased performance in cued, and decreased in not cued, locations. For higher efficacy of visual cues designed to purposely direct user's attention, it is important to know how manipulation of cue properties affects attention. In this verification study, we addressed how varying cue complexity impacts the allocation of spatial endogenous covert attention in space and time. To gradually vary cue complexity, the discriminability of the cue was systematically modulated using a shape-based design. Performance was compared in attended and unattended locations in an orientation-discrimination task. We evaluated additional temporal costs due to processing of a more complex cue by comparing performance at two different inter-stimulus intervals. From preliminary data, attention scaled with cue discriminability, even for supra-threshold cue discriminability. Furthermore, individual cue processing times partly impacted performance for the most complex, but not simpler cues. We conclude that, first, cue complexity expressed by discriminability modulates endogenous covert attention at supra-threshold cue discriminability levels, with increasing benefits and decreasing costs; second, it is important to consider the temporal processing costs of complex visual cues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cue processing; cue properties; endogenous attention

Year:  2021        PMID: 33920907     DOI: 10.3390/vision5020018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision (Basel)        ISSN: 2411-5150


  32 in total

1.  Attention enhances contrast sensitivity at cued and impairs it at uncued locations.

Authors:  Franco Pestilli; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Attentional orienting induced by arrows and eye-gaze compared with an endogenous cue.

Authors:  D Brignani; D Guzzon; C A Marzi; C Miniussi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  PyGaze: an open-source, cross-platform toolbox for minimal-effort programming of eyetracking experiments.

Authors:  Edwin S Dalmaijer; Sebastiaan Mathôt; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-12

4.  Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination.

Authors:  M Cheal; D R Lyon
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-11

5.  Detection and recognition of radial frequency patterns.

Authors:  F Wilkinson; H R Wilson; C Habak
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Visual search: a retrospective.

Authors:  Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Voluntary attention enhances contrast appearance.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu; Jared Abrams; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-02-23

9.  Decoding covert shifts of attention induced by ambiguous visuospatial cues.

Authors:  Romain E Trachel; Maureen Clerc; Thomas G Brochier
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Gaze cueing by pareidolia faces.

Authors:  Kohske Takahashi; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.