| Literature DB >> 33920846 |
Max Langer1,2, Thomas Speck1,2, Olga Speck1,2.
Abstract
Although both the petiole and lamina of foliage leaves have been thoroughly studied, the transition zone between them has often been overlooked. We aimed to identify objectively measurable morphological and anatomical criteria for a generally valid definition of the petiole-lamina transition zone by comparing foliage leaves with various body plans (monocotyledons vs. dicotyledons) and spatial arrangements of petiole and lamina (two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional configurations). Cross-sectional geometry and tissue arrangement of petioles and transition zones were investigated via serial thin-sections and µCT. The changes in the cross-sectional geometries from the petiole to the transition zone and the course of the vascular bundles in the transition zone apparently depend on the spatial arrangement, while the arrangement of the vascular bundles in the petioles depends on the body plan. We found an exponential acropetal increase in the cross-sectional area and axial and polar second moments of area to be the defining characteristic of all transition zones studied, regardless of body plan or spatial arrangement. In conclusion, a variety of terms is used in the literature for describing the region between petiole and lamina. We prefer the term "petiole-lamina transition zone" to underline its three-dimensional nature and the integration of multiple gradients of geometry, shape, and size.Entities:
Keywords: Caladium bicolor; Hemigraphis alternata; Hosta x tardiana ‘El Niño’; Pilea peperomioides; anatomy; foliage leaf; lamina; morphology; petiole; transition zone
Year: 2021 PMID: 33920846 PMCID: PMC8071152 DOI: 10.3390/plants10040774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Compilation of the different terms that can be found in the literature and that are used to describe the transition between the petiole and lamina.
| Description | Plant Species | Scientific Field | Author(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
transition from petiole to lamina | various | ontogeny and morphology | Sewell, 1891 [ |
|
point of union of petiole and lamina | |||
|
laminar joint |
| diaphototropism and anatomy | Yin, 1938 [ |
|
point of attachment of the lamina base to the petiole |
| morphology and anatomy | Foster and Arnott, 1960 [ |
|
point of junction between the base of the lamina and the petiole | |||
|
petiole–lamina junction | |||
|
petiole–lamina juncture |
| ontogeny and anatomy | Isebrands and Larson, 1977 [ |
|
point where the petiole entered the leaf |
| functional morphology, anatomy and biomechanics | Roth-Nebelsick et al., 2001 [ |
|
junction of petiole to lamina |
| biomechanics, functional morphology and physiology | Niinemets and Fleck, 2002 [ |
|
attachment point of lamina to petiole | |||
|
border between petiole and lamina | various | systematics and morphometry | Poulsen and Nordal, 2005 [ |
|
petiole–lamina junction |
| physiology and morphology | Sack et al., 2008 [ |
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
petiole-blade junction | various | ontogeny, anatomy and morphometry | Jones and Kang, 2015 [ |
|
lamina petiole junction | various | anatomy and allometry | Ray and Jones, 2018 [ |
|
petiole/lamina junction |
| morphometry and biomechanics | Louf et al., 2018 [ |
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
petiole–lamina transition zone |
| biomimetics | Langer et al., 2019 [ |
|
transition zone transition area |
| functional morphology and biomechanics | Sacher et al., 2019 [ |
|
| |||
|
junction of the blade and the petiole | various | allometry and morphometry | Huang et al., 2019 [ |
|
point of attachment of leaf lamina and petiole |
| systematics and morphology | Wilson et al., 2019 [ |
|
petiole/blade junction junction of the petiole and blade | various | systematics and morphology | Yeng et al., 2019 [ |
|
intersection point of the leaf blade and the petiole intersection point between the leaf blade and petiole |
| functional morphology and biomechanics | Ginebra-Solanellas et al., 2020 [ |
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
petiole–lamina junction | various species with peltate leaves | functional morphology, systematics | Wunnenberg et al., 2021 [ |
|
petiole–lamina transition zone |
| functional morphology, biomimetics | this study |
|
| |||
|
|
A list of all analyzed variables and a brief description of each.
| Variable | Description |
|---|---|
|
| Aspect ratio of the diameters in lateral ( |
| α | Tapering mode of the petiole |
|
| Cross-sectional area of the transverse section |
|
| Axial second moment of area of the transverse section |
|
| Polar second moment of area of the transverse section |
|
| Ratio of axial and polar second moments of area |
|
| Slope of the linear fit calculated for the cross-sectional area ( |
|
| Growth constant of the exponential fit calculated for the cross-sectional area ( |
|
| Area fraction of vascular tissue in relation to the total cross-sectional area ( |
Data of geometry, shape, and size of petioles and transition zones of the four model plants Hosta x tardiana ‘El Niño’, Caladium bicolor, Hemigraphis alternata, and Pilea peperomioides.
| Monocotyledons | Dicotyledons | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration | 2D | 3D | 2D | 3D | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Change of the cross-sectional geometry from petiole to transition zone | U-profile → | circular → | elliptic → | circular → | |
|
| ||||||
| Aspect ratio of the petiole | 1.13 (0.13) | 0.95 (0.09) | 1.22 (0.09) | 1.05 (0.08) | 25 | |
| Tapering mode of the petiole | 1.47 (0.40) | 0.91 (0.15) | 1.36 (0.57) | 1.18 (0.54) | 25 | |
| Ratio of axial and polar second moment of area of the petiole | 0.33 (0.05) | 0.53 (0.05) | 0.40 (0.03) | 0.47 (0.04) | 25 | |
| Ratio of axial and polar second moment of area of the transition zone | 0.45 (0.14) | 0.60 (0.13) | 0.37 (0.24) | 0.42 (0.08) | 6 | |
|
| ||||||
| Slope of the linear fit for the cross-sectional area of the apical petiole | 0.11 (1.05) | 0.65 (0.52) | −0.02 (0.17) | 0.12 (0.26) | 6 | |
| Growth constant of the exponential fit for the cross-sectional area of the transition zone | 0.12 (0.11) | 0.51 (0.10) | 2.73 (1.47) | 1.94 (0.80) | 6 | |
| Slope of the linear fit for the axial second moment of area of the apical petiole | 1.60 (4.45) | 1.36 (1.42) | −0.01 (0.07) | 0.08 (0.27) | 6 | |
| Growth constant of the exponential fit for the axial second moment of area of the transition zone | 0.47 (0.47) | 1.35 (0.19) | 7.26 (2.11) | 3.87 (1.17) | 6 | |
| Slope of the linear fit for the polar second moment of area of the apical petiole | 4.33 (14.99) | 2.18 (2.17) | −0.01 (0.17) | 0.22 (0.59) | 6 | |
| Growth constant of the exponential fit for the polar second moment of area of the transition zone | 0.47 (0.37) | 1.36 (0.16) | 10.65 (6.27) | 4.18 (1.41) | 6 | |
Figure 1Axial second moment of area I (a,b,e,f), number of vascular bundles, and area fraction of the vascular tissue AF (c,d,g,h) of the apical petiole and the transition zone of one leaf of Hosta x tardiana ‘El Niño’ (a,c), Caladium bicolor (b,d), Hemigraphis alternata (e,g), and Pilea peperomioides (f,h) plotted against the section height (0 = basal end of the samples).
Figure 2Segmented vascular tissue from µCT data of the transition zones of Hosta x tardiana ‘El Niño’ (a,e,i), Caladium bicolor (b,f,j), Hemigraphis alternata (c,g,k), and Pilea peperomioides (d,h,l). A side, top, and bottom view of the vascular tissue is shown for each species. In side view, the specimens are oriented with the abaxial side to the right and the adaxial side to the left. Scale bars for all images equal 1 mm.
Figure 3Morphology and anatomy of the foliage leaf of Hosta x tardiana ‘El Niño’ (a). The thin-sections of the transition zone are stained with acridine orange (c), while the thin-sections of the petiole are stained with toluidine blue (b). The scale bar of the leaf morphology equals 2 cm and those of the anatomical sections equal 1 mm.
Figure 4Morphology and anatomy of the foliage leaf of Caladium bicolor (a). The thin-sections of the transition zone are stained with acridine orange (c). The thin-sections of the petiole are stained with toluidine blue (b). The scale bar of the leaf morphology equals 2 cm and those of the anatomical sections equal 1 mm.
Figure 5Morphology and anatomy of the foliage leaf of Hemigraphis alternata (a). The thin-sections of the transition zone are stained with acridine orange (c), whereas the thin-sections of the petiole are stained with toluidine blue (b). The scale bar of the leaf morphology equals 2 cm and those of the anatomical sections equal 1 mm.
Figure 6Morphology and anatomy of the foliage leaf of Pilea peperomioides (a). The thin-sections of the transition zone are stained with acridine orange (c) and those of the petiole are stained with toluidine blue (b). The scale bar of the leaf morphology equals 2 cm and those of the anatomical sections equal 1 mm.