Literature DB >> 3392067

Results of revision total knee arthroplasties using condylar prostheses. A review of fifty knees.

J A Rand1, R S Bryan.   

Abstract

Revisions of total knee arthroplasties for aseptic failure have provided varied results. In this review of fifty revisions in which a condylar prosthesis was used in carefully selected knees, the results were rated good or excellent in 76 per cent after an average length of follow-up of 4.8 years. At the follow-up examination, radiolucent lines were seen in 17 per cent of the knees. The complications included loosening of one or both prosthetic components in three knees (of which two were revised again); a hematoma in one knee; and a piece of loose cement, which had to be removed, in one knee. There were no deep infections. On the basis of these results, we concluded that revision total knee arthroplasty using a condylar prosthesis will have infrequent complications and will provide a satisfactory result in properly selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3392067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  7 in total

1.  Morbid Obesity: Increased Risk of Failure After Aseptic Revision TKA.

Authors:  Chad D Watts; Eric R Wagner; Matthew T Houdek; David G Lewallen; Tad M Mabry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Increased constraint of rotating hinge knee prosthesis is associated with poorer clinical outcomes as compared to constrained condylar knee prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jason Beng Teck Lim; Hee Nee Pang; Keng Jin Darren Tay; Shi-Lu Chia; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-12-16

3.  Revision total knee arthroplasty infection: incidence and predictors.

Authors:  S M Javad Mortazavi; Justin Schwartzenberger; Matthew S Austin; James J Purtill; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior stabilized, condylar constrained or fully constrained prosthesis: a minimum 2-year follow-up analysis.

Authors:  Sun-Chul Hwang; Jae-Yeon Kong; Dae-Cheol Nam; Dong-Hee Kim; Hyung-Bin Park; Soon-Taek Jeong; Se-Hyun Cho
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-05-04

5.  Failure following revision total knee arthroplasty: infection is the major cause.

Authors:  S M Javad Mortazavi; Jeremy Molligan; Matthew S Austin; James J Purtill; William J Hozack; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Hang; Tyman E Stanford; Stephen E Graves; David C Davidson; Richard N de Steiger; Lisa N Miller
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Results of a Second-generation Constrained Condylar Prosthesis in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Mean 5.5-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Chen-Yi Ye; De-Ting Xue; Shuai Jiang; Rong-Xin He
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.