| Literature DB >> 33920086 |
Albert Álvarez-Carulla1, Yaiza Montes-Cebrián1, Jordi Colomer-Farrarons1, Pere Lluís Miribel-Català1.
Abstract
A novel self-powered point-of-care low-power electronics approach for galvanic cell-based sample concentration measurement is presented. The electronic system harvests and senses at the same time from the single cell. The system implements a solution that is suitable in those scenarios where extreme low power is generated from the fuel cell. The proposed approach implements a capacitive-based method to perform a non-linear sweep voltammetry to the cell, but without the need to implement a potentiostat amplifier for that purpose. It provides a digital-user readable result without the need for external non-self-powered devices or instruments compared with other solutions. The system conception was validated for a particular case. The scenario consisted of the measurement of a NaCl solution as the electrolyte, which was related to the conductivity of the sample. The electronic reader continuously measured the current with a transfer function gain of 1.012 V mA-1. The overall system exhibited a maximum coefficient of variation of 6.1%, which was an improvement compared with the state-of-the-art. The proof of concept of this electronics system was validated with a maximum power consumption of 5.8 μW using commercial-off-the-self parts.Entities:
Keywords: energy harvesting; fuel cells; point-of-care; self-powered; supercapacitors
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33920086 PMCID: PMC8069887 DOI: 10.3390/s21082665
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1(a) Scheme of the application consisting of a disposable test strip and a reusable electronic reader. (b) Block diagram of the proposed self-powered point-of-care device.
Figure 2(a) Schematic of the implemented self-powered point-of-care device. (b) Picture of the implemented self-powered point-of-care device.
Figure 3(a) Polarization curves of two NaCl-based galvanic cells stacked in series using an opencircuit potential to 0 V linear sweep voltammetry with a scan rate of 10 mVs−1 for samples with an increasing conductivity of 5, 30, 60 and 160 mM equiv NaCl. (b) Current vs. NaCl sample concentration transfer function extracted for a polarization voltage of 0.9 V from polarization curves of two NaCl-based galvanic cells stacked in series using an open-circuit potential to 0 V linear sweep voltammetry with a scan rate of 10 mVs−1 for samples with an increasing conductivity of 5, 30, 60 and 160mM equiv NaCl.
Figure 4(a) Output current transient waveforms of two NaCl-based galvanic cells stacked in series using the 0 V to open-circuit potential capacitor-based non-linear sweep voltammetry for samples with an increasing conductivity of 5, 30, 60 and 160 mM equiv NaCl. The label pairs (t5, I5), (t30, I30), (t60, I60), and (t160, I160) correspond to the time when a measurement is performed and the corresponding measured current for an increasing conductivity of 5, 30, 60 and 160 mM equiv NaCl, respectively. (b) Polarization curves of two NaCl-based galvanic cells stacked in series using the 0 V to open-circuit potential capacitor-based non-linear sweep voltammetry for samples with an increasing conductivity of 5, 30, 60 and 160 mM equiv NaCl. (c) Output voltage transient waveforms of two NaCl-based galvanic cells stacked in series using the 0 V to open-circuit potential capacitor-based non-linear sweep voltammetry for samples with an increasing conductivity of 5, 30, 60 and 160 mM equiv NaCl. The label pairs (t5, I5), (t30, I30), (t60, I60), and (t160, I160) correspond to the time when a measurement is performed and the corresponding measured current for an increasing conductivity of 5, 30, 60 and 160 mM equiv NaCl, respectively. (d) Current vs. NaCl sample concentration transfer function extracted for a polarization voltage of 0.9 V from polarization curves of two NaCl-based galvanic cells stacked in series using the 0V to open-circuit potential capacitor-based non-linear sweep voltammetry for samples with an increasing conductivity of 5, 30, 60 and 160 mM equiv NaCl.
Figure 5(a) Transient waveforms of the signals involved during the measurement of a sample concentration below the threshold concentration using the implemented self-powered point-of-care device. (b) Transient waveforms of the signals involved during the measurement of a sample concentration above the threshold concentration using the implemented self-powered point-of-care device.
Figure 6(a) Transfer function and comparator output results using the implemented self-powered point-of-care device configured for sample concentration discrimination above and below 60 mM. (b) Time needed by the implemented self-powered point-of-care device to perform the measurement for different sample concentrations.