| Literature DB >> 33920041 |
Hai Huang1, Juan Du1, Shang-Wei Li1, Tao Gong1.
Abstract
Coridius chinensis is a valuable medicinal insect resource in China. Previous studies have indicated that the antibacterial and anticancer effects of theEntities:
Keywords: Coridius chinensis; antibacterial activity; c-type lysozyme; innate immunity; muramidase activity
Year: 2021 PMID: 33920041 PMCID: PMC8071013 DOI: 10.3390/biology10040330
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biology (Basel) ISSN: 2079-7737
Primers used for verification and expression analyses of CcLys2.
| Primer Name | Sequence | Primer Usage |
|---|---|---|
| T7-F | 5′-TAATACGACTCACTATAGG-3′ | Clone |
| T7-R | 5′-GCTAGTTATTGCTCAGCGG-3′ | |
| Lys-qF | 5′-CTCTTGGAGGACGACGACATCT-3′ | RT-qPCR |
| Lys-qR | 5′-TGACTGTGGTGTTGGACTGTGA-3′ | |
| Actin-F | 5′-ACCGCTGAGAGGGAAATCG-3′ | |
| Actin-R | 5′-CAAGAAGGAAGGCTGGAAGAG-3′ |
Figure 1Amino acids and domain structure of CcLys2. (a) The amino acid sequence of CcLys2. The arrow denotes the cleavage site of the signal peptide (1–13). The eight cysteine residues are marked in red, E33 and D50 are marked with black boxes, and glycosylation sites are marked in blue. The characteristic domain LYZ1 of the c-type lysozyme is underlined. (b) Domain structure of CcLys2. This diagram was generated using SMART and mainly shows the domain LYZ1 of CcLys2.
Figure 2Three-dimensional molecular structure of the mature CcLys2. (a) This graphic was generated with PyMOL 2.4 based on the CcLys2.pdb data. C6–C124, C27–C113, C62–C73, and C69–C87 indicate four disulfide bonds. The putative catalytic site (E32 and D50) is located between the α-helices and β-pleated sheets. (b) The highly conserved region (in fuchsin) is displayed in the structure. Homology model was performed by the ConSurf software (https://consurf.tau.ac.il/, 12 February 2021) and optimized using PyMOL 2.4.
Figure 3Multiple sequence alignment of CcLys2 with typical c-type lysozymes from 6 other insects. Asterisks mark eight cysteines, pounds mark characteristic catalytic residues glutamate (E) and aspartate (D), and the black triangle marks the characteristic H that replace the conserved Y in the majority of c-type lysozymes. Identical residues are shown in black boxes and strongly conserved residues are shown in gray boxes. Species that lysozymes originate from and GenBank accession numbers of the lysozymes are listed in Table S1.
Figure 4A phylogenetic tree constructed from 19 lysozymes and 5 lysozyme-like proteins (LLPs). This tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method (NJ) in MEGA X. In total, 1000 replicates were performed and bootstrap confidence values are shown at the node in this tree. The black triangle marks lysozyme from C. chinensis and the black dot marks lysozyme-like protein from C. chinensis. HLYZ1 of human and HEWL of chicken are used as outgroups. Species that lysozymes originate from and GenBank accession numbers of the lysozymes are listed in Table S1.
Figure 5Spatiotemporal expression profile of CcLys2. (a) Expression levels of CcLys2 at various developmental stages. E: egg; N1–N5: first–fifth-instar nymphs; F: female; M: male. (b) Expression levels of CcLys2 in different adult tissues. He: head; FB: fat body; Hl: hemolymph; Mg: midgut; Mu: muscle; In: integument; Te: testis; Ov: ovary. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Different letters above the bars represent significant differences at p < 0.05 based on Duncan’s test.
Figure 6Relative expression levels of CcLys2 at different times of induction. (a) Relative expression levels of CcLys2 at different time after injecting bacteria. (b) Relative expression levels of CcLys2 in the midgut 6 h after feeding bacteria. CK denotes the blank control group without any treatment. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Different letters above bars represent significant differences at p < 0.05 based on Duncan’s test.
Figure 7Identification of recombinant CcLys2 protein. (a) SDS-PAGE analysis of the bacterial lysate. Lane 1: the non-induced bacterial culture; Lane 2: the soluble supernatant; Lanes 3 and 4: inclusion body protein. (b) Purified CcLys2. Lane 1: fusion CcLys2. (c) Western blot analysis of CcLys2. Lane 1: blotting band of fusion CcLys2. M: Protein molecular weight marker (10–140 kDa). The arrow indicates the bands of fusion CcLys2.
Figure 8Optimum pH and muramidase activity of CcLys2. (a) The relative activity of CcLys2 was determined using the turbidimetric method at different pH values (4.5–8.0). (b) CcLys2, HEWL, and the non-induced bacterial culture (supernatant) were incubated with M. luteus and the change in OD450 over time was recorded.
Figure 9Antibacterial activity of CcLys2. (a) The CcLys2 lytic zone of Micrococcus luteus and Escherichia coli were observed at pH 6.0. (b) Lytic zones produced by CcLys2 were measured against the six bacteria. For the plate without a lytic zone, the diameter of a hole was used to represent the one of a lytic zone (0.6 ± 0.01 cm). Data are expressed as the mean values with standard deviations.