| Literature DB >> 33920016 |
Muhammad Rafiullah Khan1,2,3, Vanee Chonhenchob2,3, Chongxing Huang1, Panitee Suwanamornlert4.
Abstract
Microorganisms causing anthracnose diseases have a medium to a high level of resistance to the existing fungicides. This study aimed to investigate neem plant extract (propyl disulfide, PD) as an alternative to the current fungicides against mango's anthracnose. Microorganisms were isolated from decayed mango and identified as Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Colletotrichum acutatum. Next, a pathogenicity test was conducted and after fulfilling Koch's postulates, fungi were reisolated from these symptomatic fruits and we thus obtained pure cultures. Then, different concentrations of PD were used against these fungi in vapor and agar diffusion assays. Ethanol and distilled water were served as control treatments. PD significantly (p ≤ 0.05) inhibited more of the mycelial growth of these fungi than both controls. The antifungal activity of PD increased with increasing concentrations. The vapor diffusion assay was more effective in inhibiting the mycelial growth of these fungi than the agar diffusion assay. A good fit (R2, 0.950) of the experimental data in the Gompertz growth model and a significant difference in the model parameters, i.e., lag phase (λ), stationary phase (A) and mycelial growth rate, further showed the antifungal efficacy of PD. Therefore, PD could be the best antimicrobial compound against a wide range of microorganisms.Entities:
Keywords: anthracnose; antimicrobial; mango; microorganisms; natural plant extract; neem; postharvest decay; propyl disulfide
Year: 2021 PMID: 33920016 PMCID: PMC8070996 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9040839
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Structure of propyl disulfide.
Figure 2C. acutatum and C. gloeosporioides isolated from the decayed mangoes and their respective colonies and conidia. Bar = 10 µm.
Figure 3Effects of different concentrations of propyl disulfide in the vapor phase assay on the mycelial growth of C. acutatum at day 14 (A) and C. gloeosporioides at day 10 (B). Different small letters in each concentration represent a significant difference among the treatments. The mycelial growth presented is the mean of five replicates ± SD at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 4Effects of different concentrations of propyl disulfide in the agar diffusion assay on the mycelial growth of C. acutatum at day 14 (A) and C. gloeosporioides at day 10 (B). Different small letters in each concentration represent a significant difference among the treatments. The mycelial growth presented is the mean of five replicates ± SD at p ≤ 0.05.
Percentage of mycelial growth inhibition (%) of major pathogens isolated from mango exposed to various concentrations of propyl disulfide in vapor phase compared to control stored at ambient temperature (26 ± 3 °C).
| Concentrations | ||
|---|---|---|
| 800 | 29.23 aB (0.88) | 43.87 aA (1.70) |
| 400 | 23.41 bB (2.89) | 33.53 bA (1.75) |
| 200 | 19.34 cB (2.06) | 28.93 cA (1.93) |
| 100 | 17.96 cA (0.78) | 17.73 dA (0.55) |
| 50 | 11.74 dB (2.54) | 15.51 dA (1.70) |
| 25 | 5.26 eA (2.00) | 6.63 eA (2.39) |
| MIC * | ˃80 | ˃80 |
Different small letters within the column and capital letters within the row represent a significant difference between different concentrations and within fungi at each concentration, respectively. Means are separated by the DMRT test (p ≤ 0.05). Each point is the average of five replicates; standard deviation (SD) is given in parentheses. MIC * = minimum inhibitory concentration.
Mycelial growth inhibition (%) of major pathogens isolated from mango exposed to various concentrations of propyl disulfide incorporated in the potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium (agar diffusion assay) at ambient temperature (26 ± 3 °C).
| Concentrations | ||
|---|---|---|
| 800 | 35.19 aA (2.84) | 33.93 aA (1.10) |
| 400 | 25.15 bA (1.07) | 18.43 bB (2.13) |
| 200 | 19.93 cA (1.50) | 11.36 cB (2.18) |
| 100 | 9.33 dA (1.09) | 6.95 dB (1.73) |
| 50 | 8.64 dA (1.71) | 3.44 eB (1.15) |
| 25 | 7.15 dA (2.66) | 2.95 eB (0.82) |
| MIC * | ˃80 | ˃80 |
Different small letters within the column and capital letters within the row represent a significant difference between different concentrations and within fungi at each concentration, respectively. Means are separated by the DMRT test (p < 0.05). Each point is the average of five replicates; standard deviation (SD) is given in parentheses. MIC * = minimum inhibitory concentration.
Figure 5Effect of PD in the vapor diffusion assay on the growth of C. acutatum (A) and C. gloeosporioides (B). The mycelial growth presented is the mean of five replicates ± SD at p ≤ 0.05. Dt is the average colony diameter at time t and D0 is the average colony diameter at initial time, fitted (distilled water, ethanol and propyl disulfide) with the modified Gompertz model.
Figure 6Effect of PD in the agar diffusion assay on the growth of C. acutatum (A) and C. gloeosporioides (B). The mycelial growth presented is the mean of five replicates ± SD at p ≤ 0.05. Dt is the average colony diameter at time t and D0 is the average colony diameter at initial time, fitted (distilled water, ethanol and propyl disulfide) with the modified Gompertz model.
Modified Gompertz model parameters for vapor diffusion assay.
| Antifungal |
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSE |
| MSE |
| |||||||
| Distilled water | 2.79 a | 0.81 a | 0.96 b | 0.091 | 0.905 | 2.86 a | 0.94 a | 0.91 b | 0.041 | 0.949 |
| Ethanol | 2.64 b | 0.66 c | 0.99 b | 0.077 | 0.911 | 2.82 a | 0.87 b | 0.94 b | 0.044 | 0.938 |
| Propyl disulfide | 2.47 c | 0.76 b | 1.32 a | 0.244 | 0.750 | 2.36 b | 0.74 c | 1.38 a | 0.189 | 0.763 |
Different superscript letters within each column are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05). The standard deviation (SD) is given in parentheses below the average.
Modified Gompertz model parameters for agar diffusion assay.
| Antifungal Agents |
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSE |
| MSE |
| |||||||
| Distilled water | 2.63 a | 0.84 a | 0.93 b | 0.056 | 0.939 | 2.85 a | 0.97 a | 0.88 b | 0.052 | 0.934 |
| Ethanol | 2.63 a | 0.82 a | 0.94 b | 0.084 | 0.903 | 2.83 a | 0.96 a | 0.89 b | 0.039 | 0.952 |
| Propyl disulfide | 2.40 b | 0.69 b | 1.53 a | 0.064 | 0.924 | 2.49 b | 0.72 b | 1.33 a | 0.225 | 0.722 |
Different superscript letters within each column are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05). The standard deviation (SD) is given in parentheses below the average.