| Literature DB >> 33919703 |
Massimo De Nardi1,2, Ambra Bisio2,3, Lucio Della Guardia4, Carlo Facheris1, Emanuela Faelli2,3, Antonio La Torre4,5, Livio Luzi4,6, Piero Ruggeri2,3, Roberto Codella4,6.
Abstract
Cryostimulation is currently seen as a potential adjuvant strategy to tackle obesity and dysmetabolism by triggering cold-induced thermogenesis. Although suggestive, the underlying mechanisms are still poorly elucidated. We tested whether single or repeated applications of partial-body cryostimulation (PBC) could influence resting energy expenditure (REE) in exposed individuals. Fifteen middle-aged obese and sixteen control lean women (body mass index 31 ± 1.6 kg/m2 and 22 ± 1.7 kg/m2) underwent a daily PBC (-130 °C × 150 s) for five consecutive days. Resting energy metabolism (REE) was assessed by indirect calorimetry pre- and post-PBC on day 1 and day 5. As concerns REE, the linear mixed model revealed that REE changes were explained by session and time (F1,29 = 5.58; p = 0.02; ƞp2 = 0.16) independent of the group (F1,29 = 2.9; p = 0.09; ƞp2 = 0.09). REE pre-PBC increased from day 1 to day 5 either in leans (by 8.2%, from 1538 ± 111 to 1665 ± 106 kcal/day) or in obese women (by 5.5%, from 1610 ± 110 to 1698 ± 142 vs kcal/day). Respiratory quotient was significantly affected by the time (F1,29 = 51.61; p < 0.000001, ƞp2 = 0.64), as it increased from pre- to post-PBC, suggesting a shift in substrate oxidation. According to these preliminary data, cold-induced thermogenesis could be explored as a strategy to elevate REE in obese subjects. Longitudinal studies could test whether chronic PBC effects may entail favorable metabolic adaptations.Entities:
Keywords: adipocytes; brown adipose tissue; cold therapy; indirect calorimetry; metabolism; obesity treatment; skeletal muscle; thermogenesis; weight loss; white adipose tissue
Year: 2021 PMID: 33919703 PMCID: PMC8070728 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18084127
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Flow-chart of the study. Obese and lean women underwent multiple exposures of Partial-Body Cryostimulation PBC (n = 5). Their Resting Energy Expenditure (REE) was indirectly derived prior and upon completion of the first and fifth day of PBC session.
Characteristics of the study subjects.
| Lean | Obese | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 40.4 ± 6 | 42.7 ± 10.4 | 0.46 |
| Height (cm) | 162.6 ± 5.5 | 163.7 ± 6.8 | 0.64 |
| Weight (kg) | 58.3 ± 4.5 | 83.2 ± 7.3 | <0.0001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22 ± 1.7 | 31 ± 1.6 | <0.0001 |
| Basal REE * (kcal/day) | 1538 ± 111 | 1610 ± 110 | <0.0001 |
| Physical Activity (MET **-min/week) | 1760 ± 1660 | 2149 ± 934 | 0.7 |
| Dietary intake (kcal/day) | 1254 ± 191 | 1432 ± 820 | 0.67 |
Data are shown as mean ± SD. * Resting Energy Expenditure. ** Metabolic Equivalent of Task.
Figure 2Effects of 5 days of cryostimulation sessions on the REE recorded before and after PBC, on day 1 and day 5, in obese and lean women (controls). Statistically significant comparisons are indicated in the results section.
Study-subjects’ results throughout the entire experimental timespan.
| Lean | Obese | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | Day 5 | Day 1 | Day 5 | |||||
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |
| 224 ± 15 | 235 ± 17 | 244 ± 15 | 242 ± 17 | 234 ± 17 | 234 ± 37 | 248 ± 21 | 244 ± 31 | |
| 176 ± 20 | 203 ± 16 | 186 ± 20 | 197 ± 20 | 186 ± 17 | 201 ± 23 | 193 ± 23 | 212 ± 24 | |
| RQ ( | 0.79 ± 0.06 | 0.86 ± 0.08 | 0.76 ± 0.07 | 0.82 ± 0.07 | 0.80 ± 0.08 | 0.87 ± 0.11 | 0.78 ± 0.09 | 0.87 ± 0.07 |
| REE (kcal/day) | 1538 ± 111 | 1645 ± 107 | 1665 ± 106 | 1676 ± 115 | 1610 ± 110 | 1632 ± 229 | 1698 ± 142 | 1706 ± 203 |
Data are shown as mean ± SD.