| Literature DB >> 33919505 |
Sangjoon Choi1, Yoon Yang Jung2, Hyun-Soo Kim1.
Abstract
We present herein a rare case of uterine serous carcinoma with mesonephric-like differentiation (SC-MLD) initially misdiagnosed as mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA). A 51-year-old woman underwent total hysterectomy for a uterine tumor. Histologically, the tumor exhibited various architectures, including papillary, glandular, tubular, cribriform, and cystic. On the basis of this architectural diversity accompanied by intraluminal eosinophilic secretions and intermediate-grade nuclear atypia, the initial diagnosis was MLA. However, the tumor was diffusely and strongly positive for the expression of p16 and negative for the expression of GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3). Furthermore, we identified a pathogenic tumor protein 53 (TP53) mutation affecting an acceptor splice site in intron 9, despite a wild-type p53 immunostaining pattern. The observations of diffuse and strong p16 expression, lack of GATA3 expression, pathogenic TP53 mutation, and wild-type Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog indicate that this tumor was not an MLA but an SC-MLD. Both uterine SC and MLA can exhibit various histological growth patterns. Our comprehensive clinicopathological and molecular analyses can serve to improve the understanding of this rare condition and help pathologists in making an accurate diagnosis.Entities:
Keywords: TP53 mutation; endometrium; mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma; serous carcinoma; uterus
Year: 2021 PMID: 33919505 PMCID: PMC8073336 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11040717
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
Figure 1Histological features observed on initial microscopic examination. (A) Scanning magnification revealing that the tumor involved the entire myometrial thickness. The irregular glands and cysts contained papillary cellular buds. We considered that the presence of large, cystically dilated spaces was a very uncommon finding if this tumor is endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma or serous carcinoma. (B) Glandular (left half) and solid (right half) tumor growth patterns resembling grade 2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. (C) At the invasive front, the infiltrating tumor glands accompanied by strong desmoplastic stromal reaction. (D) Intraluminal floating papillary tufts and micropapillae morphologically similar to those of serous carcinoma. (E) Small tubular and glandular patterns merged into each other and forming a cribriform architecture. The tubules are small, round, uniform, and closely packed; lined with cuboidal-to-low columnar epithelial cells; and accompanied by little intervening stroma, producing a back-to-back appearance. (F) In some foci, elongated, slit-like branching tubules lined by flattened epithelial cells and containing papillary tufts (right half; retiform pattern). (G) In areas of poorly differentiated carcinoma, the tumor cells with poorly formed, angulated glands, cords, and small nests. (H) The nuclei of tumor cells exhibiting tubular and glandular growth patterns show intermediate-grade nuclear atypia, similar to that observed in grade 1 or 2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma. The intraluminal eosinophilic secretions (blue arrows) occasionally observed in tubules and glands. (I) Tumor cells growing in solid and papillary patterns displaying moderate-to-severe nuclear pleomorphism and frequent mitotic figures (left upper quadrant) and apoptotic bodies (right lower quadrant). (J) Atypical mitotic figures (green circles) are often present. On the basis of the architectural diversity and intraluminal eosinophilic secretions, we initially considered this tumor as mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma. Staining method: A–J, hematoxylin and eosin staining. Original magnification: (A) ×10; (B,C) ×40; (D–G) ×100; (H–J) ×400.
Figure 2Immunostaining results (A–D) and histological features detected on re-examination (E–H). (A) Paired box 2 expression observed in most tumor cell nuclei, though the staining intensity was weak-to-moderate. (B) GATA-binding protein 3 expression was absent, which does not support uterine mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA). (C) p53 expression was patchy, with faint-to-weak staining intensity in approximately half of the tumor cell nuclei. This wild-type p53 immunostaining pattern is compatible with MLA but not with endometrial serous carcinoma (SC). (D) Uniform and intense nuclear and cytoplasmic p16 immunoreactivity in the entire tumor tissue strongly indicated the possibility of SC. These immunostaining results made us re-examine the hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides. (E) We found a few additional microscopic foci showing intraluminal eosinophilic secretions (blue arrows). (F) The presence of psammomatous microcalcifications (yellow arrows), which was not identified in initial microscopic examination, further supported SC. (G) Large papillae with edematous stroma possessing many variable-height micropapillae along their surface. (H) High-power magnification of the micropapillae revealing nuclear hyperchromasia and severe pleomorphism as well as numerous mitotic figures and many apoptotic bodies, all of which are compatible with SC. Staining method: (A–D) polymer method; (E–H) hematoxylin and eosin staining. Original magnification: (A–F) ×400; (G) ×40; (H) ×200.
Figure 3Copy number plots. The Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) gene is markedly amplified.
Summary of histological features, immunostaining results, and targeted sequencing results.
| Parameter | Result | Interpretation | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Histology | Architectural diversity | Present | Supports both MLA and SC |
| Papillary and solid patterns | Present | Support both MLA and SC | |
| Small tubular and glandular patterns | Present | Support MLA; possible in SC | |
| Intraluminal eosinophilic secretions | Present | Support MLA | |
| Psammomatous microcalcifications | Present | Support SC | |
| Severe nuclear pleomorphism | Present | Support SC; possible in MLA | |
| Brisk mitotic activity | Present | Support SC; possible in MLA | |
| Immunostaining | ER | Negative | Support both MLA and SC |
| PR | Negative | Support both MLA and SC | |
| PTEN | Preserved | Support both MLA and SC | |
| PAX2 | Diffusely positive with weak-to-moderate intensity | Support MLA | |
| GATA3 | Negative | Do not support MLA | |
| p16 | Diffusely positive with strong intensity | Support SC | |
| p53 | Wild-type pattern | Do not support SC | |
| Targeted sequencing |
| Wild type | Do not support MLA |
|
| Pathogenic mutation (splice acceptor variant) | Support SC | |
|
| Amplification | Support SC; unknown in MLA | |
ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10; PAX2, paired box 2; GATA3, GATA-binding protein 3; KRAS, Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog; TP53, tumor protein 53; ERBB2, erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2.