Literature DB >> 19623034

Utility of p16 expression for distinction of uterine serous carcinomas from endometrial endometrioid and endocervical adenocarcinomas: immunohistochemical analysis of 201 cases.

Anna Yemelyanova1, Hongxiu Ji, Ie-Ming Shih, Tian-Li Wang, Lee-Shu-Fune Wu, Brigitte M Ronnett.   

Abstract

Uterine serous carcinomas typically have a characteristic morphology (papillary architecture, high-grade nuclei) and immunoprofile (diffuse/strong p53 expression, loss of hormone receptor expression) that distinguish them from most endometrial endometrioid carcinomas. However, glandular variants of serous carcinoma can simulate Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique (FIGO) grade 2 endometrioid carcinomas, and some serous carcinomas lack p53 expression and retain hormone receptor expression, making classification difficult. P16 expression patterns distinguish endometrioid carcinomas (patchy) from human papillomavirus (HPV)-related endocervical adenocarcinomas (diffuse/strong) but utility for distinction of serous carcinomas from endometrioid carcinomas and endocervical adenocarcinomas has not been evaluated in a large series. Immunohistochemical analysis of p16 expression was performed on 201 uterine and endocervical adenocarcinomas in hysterectomy specimens, including 49 serous carcinomas, 101 endometrial endometrioid carcinomas (44 FIGO grade 1, 40 FIGO grade 2, and 17 FIGO grade 3), and 51 HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinomas. All serous carcinomas demonstrated diffuse/moderate-strong p16 expression, with percentage of positive tumor cells ranging from 90% to 100% (mean/median: 95%/100%). In contrast, endometrial endometrioid carcinomas exhibited less diffuse and less intense expression, with percent of positive tumor cells ranging from 10% to 90% (mean/median: 38%/30%; staining intensity: variable). Similar to serous carcinomas, all endocervical adenocarcinomas exhibited diffuse/moderate-strong p16 expression, with percentage of positive tumor cells ranging from 90% to 100% (mean/median: 94%/90%). P16 can serve as an additional diagnostic marker, used as part of an immunohistochemical panel, including p53 and hormone receptors, for distinction of uterine serous carcinomas from endometrioid carcinomas. Distinction of serous carcinomas from endocervical adenocarcinomas (HPV-related type), both of which share diffuse p16 expression and frequently lack hormone receptor expression, relies on morphology and diffuse/strong p53 expression in the former and detection of HPV in the latter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19623034     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181ac35f5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  35 in total

1.  A panel of 3 markers including p16, ProExC, or HPV ISH is optimal for distinguishing between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Christina S Kong; Andrew H Beck; Teri A Longacre
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 2.  [Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of cervical adenocarcinoma].

Authors:  T Löning; L Riethdorf; M Köbel
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Stromal p16 expression differentiates endometrial polyp from endometrial hyperplasia.

Authors:  Suzuko Moritani; Shu Ichihara; Masaki Hasegawa; Akari Iwakoshi; Sakae Murakami; Tomoko Sato; Tomomitsu Okamoto; Yoshio Mori; Hajime Kuhara; Steven G Silverberg
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Ovarian low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma: pathogenesis, clinicopathologic and molecular biologic features, and diagnostic problems.

Authors:  Russell Vang; Ie-Ming Shih; Robert J Kurman
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.875

Review 5.  The emerging genomic landscape of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Matthieu Le Gallo; Daphne W Bell
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  Significance of p53 expression in background endometrium in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Thuy Thi Nguyen; Toru Hachisuga; Rie Urabe; Tomoko Kurita; Seiji Kagami; Toshinori Kawagoe; Shohei Shimajiri; Kazuki Nabeshima
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 7.  [Precursor lesions of endometrial carcinoma: diagnostic approach and molecular pathology].

Authors:  S Lax
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 8.  Cutaneous metastases of endometrial carcinoma: report of an unusual case and literature review.

Authors:  Yuan Fan; Hao Deng; Li Tian; Jianliu Wang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Molecular Analysis of Mixed Endometrial Carcinomas Shows Clonality in Most Cases.

Authors:  Martin Köbel; Bo Meng; Lien N Hoang; Noorah Almadani; Xiaodong Li; Robert A Soslow; C Blake Gilks; Cheng-Han Lee
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  The genomics and genetics of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Andrea J O'Hara; Daphne W Bell
Journal:  Adv Genomics Genet       Date:  2012-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.