| Literature DB >> 33919409 |
Nadi Awad Al-Harbi1, Nagy M Al Attar2, Dalia M Hikal3, Salwa E Mohamed4, Arafat Abdel Hamed Abdel Latef5, Amira A Ibrahim6, Mohamed A Abdein7.
Abstract
The risk of using synthetic insecticides to the environment, human health, and the emergence of new genera of pests resistant to that kind of drugs, have led to attention in natural compounds. The present study aimed at evaluating the insecticidal activity of 0.25-6 mg/cm2 of basil (Ocimum basilicum), black seeds (Nigella sativa), and lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) essential oils (EOs) against one of the major stored product pests, Sitophilus oryzae (L.). This was done by assessing mortality and repellent percentage assay in the adult stage, as well as analysing up and down-regulated genes associated with toxicity effect of selected EOs. The three studied EOs showed a toxic effect on S. oryzae; where O. basilicum and L. angustifolia EOs explicated 100% mortality at 6 mg/cm2 after 48 and 24 h, respectively. The highest repellence activity was recorded for O. basilicum EO at 0.75 mg/cm2 with value 82.3% after exposure time 5 h. In the highest dose (6 mg/cm2), the maximum up-regulated expression level of detoxification DEGs genes (CL1294 and CL 8) and cytochrome p45o gene (CYP4Q4) in Lavandula angustifolia EOs exhibited 8.32, 6.08, and 3.75 fold changes, respectively, as compared with 4.76 fold at 10 ppm malathion and 1.02 fold change in acetone control.Entities:
Keywords: Sitophilus oryzae; antioxidant activity; cytochrome gene; detoxification; essential oils; phytochemical constituents
Year: 2021 PMID: 33919409 PMCID: PMC8143373 DOI: 10.3390/plants10050829
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Nucleotide primer sequences used in qRT-PCR analysis in S. oryzae adult stage treated with essential oils.
| Technique | Target Gene | Sequences (5′–3′) | Annealing °C |
|---|---|---|---|
| qRT-PCR | β-Actin-F | GACCTCTATGCCAACACAGT | 60 °C |
| β-Actin-R | AGTACTTGCGCTCAGGAGGA | ||
| CL8-F | CATCCGCAAACACAACAAAC | ||
| CL8 -R | TACCTGAAGGGTCCATATGG | ||
| CYP 4Q4-F | CAGTTTGGTGATTCAGATGATG | ||
| CYP 4Q4-R | GCACATCTGGGGACAAACTT | ||
| CL1294 –F | GTCTATGCACCTGGGTCGTT | ||
| CL1294 –R | GTCGGCAGACAAGGAAGACA |
Phytochemical analysis of basil, black seeds and lavender EOs.
| S. No. | Phytochemical Test |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carbohydrate | + | - | - |
| 2 | Glycosides | + | + | - |
| 3 | Steroids | + | + | + |
| 4 | Terpenoids | + | + | + |
| 5 | Tannins | + | + | + |
| 6 | Sterols | + | + | + |
Scheme 1GC-MS chromatogram of O. basilicum EOs.
Chemical composition of O. basilicum EOs.
| Quantitative ID | Component Identified | RI | LRI | Area (%) | Identification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glycolaldehyde | 873 | 923 | 3.27 | RI, MS |
| 2 | Trioxane | 686 | 660 | t | RI, MS |
| 3 | Methyl formate | 484 | 386 | t | RI, MS |
| 4 | 2-Chloroethanol | 688 | 680 | t | RI, MS |
| 5 | Acetic acid, 2-hydroxy-, ethyl ester | 829 | 918 | t | RI, MS |
| 6 | Acetic acid, hydrazide | 863 | 946 | 1.14 | RI, MS |
| 7 | (1S)-Camphor | 1121 | 1120 | 30.321 | RI, MS |
| 8 | Ethyl 3-(6-methoxy-3-methyl-2-benzofuranyl)-3-(p-methoxyphenyl) propionate | 2749 | 2838 | t | RI, MS |
| 9 | O-Ethyl S-[1-(4-methylphenyl)-2,3-diphenyl-2-cyclopropen-1-yl] carbonodithioate | 3401 | 3490 | t | RI, MS |
| 10 | 1-{2,4-Bis[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]phenyl}-2-{4-[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]phenyl}-1-propanone | 2631 | 2720 | t | RI, MS |
| 11 | Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane | 827 | 994 | 9.936 | RI, MS |
| 12 | 2-Butyl-9(10H)-acridinone | 2342 | 2431 | t | RI, MS |
| 13 | Cridanimod | 2354 | 2443 | t | RI, MS |
| 14 | 10-Butyl-10H-acridin-9-one | 2169 | 2258 | 0.31 | RI, MS |
| 15 | 5-Amino-2-trimethylsilyloxy-acetophenone | 1639 | 1728 | 1.311 | RI, MS |
| 16 | 1-Acetyl-1,5-diazacycloheptadecan-6-one | 2550 | 2639 | t | RI, MS |
| 17 | 2,2-Bis[4-(dimethylamino)phenyl]-1-phenylethanone | 2835 | 2924 | 36.630 | RI, MS |
| 18 | Bis(3,4-dimethylphenyl) isophthalate | 3040 | 3087 | t | RI, MS |
| 19 | 2,5-Diphenyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione | 2483 | 2572 | t | RI, MS |
| 20 | Triamterene | 2829 | 2912 | 13.042 | RI, MS |
| 21 | 2-Amino-7-benzyl-4(1H)-pteridinone | 2525 | 2614 | t | RI, MS |
| 22 | 1,2-Dihydrobenzo[b]fluoranthene | 2246 | 2420 | t | RI, MS |
| 23 | 9-Phenanthrylmethyl 2,6-dimethylbenzoate | 3062 | 3109 | 2.84 | RI, MS |
| 24 | Propyl 2-tridecyn-1-yl terephthalate | 2849 | 2896 | nd | RI, MS |
| 25 | 2,3-Dichlorophenyl 2-fluoro-6-(trifluoromethyl)benzoate | 1916 | 2005 | t | RI, MS |
| 26 | 2,4-Dichloro-6-formylphenyl 2-fluoro-5-(trifluoromethyl)benzoate | 2218 | 2307 | nd | RI, MS |
| 27 | 9-Phenanthrylmethyl 2,6-dimethylbenzoate | 3062 | 3109 | t | RI, MS |
| 28 | Nonyl N-(4-ethylbenzoyl)glycinate | 2667 | 2756 | t | RI, MS |
| 29 | Undecyl N-(4-ethylbenzoyl)glycinate | 2866 | 2955 | t | RI, MS |
| 30 | Tridecyl N-(4-ethylbenzoyl)glycinate | 3065 | 3154 | t | RI, MS |
| 31 | Isobutyl N-(4-ethylbenzoyl)glycinate | 2106 | 2195 | t | RI, MS |
| 32 | 1,1′-(2,4,6-Trihydroxy-1,3-phenylene)di(1-propanone) | 2238 | 2327 | t | RI, MS |
| 33 | Propyl 2-fluoro-5-(trifluoromethyl)benzoate | 1181 | 1270 | t | RI, MS |
| 34 | 1-{2,4-Bis[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]phenyl}-2-{4-[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]phenyl}-1-propanone | 2631 | 2720 | t | RI, MS |
| 35 | 1-{2,4-Bis[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]phenyl}ethanone | 1625 | 1714 | t | RI, MS |
| 36 | Bis(2,5-dimethylphenyl) isophthalate | 3040 | 3087 | t | RI, MS |
| 37 | Pyridazinone | 885 | 968 | 0.518 | RI, MS |
| 38 | 4-Pyridazinol | 1122 | 1211 | nd | RI, MS |
| 39 | Decahydroquinoline | 1247 | 1330 | nd | RI, MS |
| 40 | N,N,2-Trimethyl-3-butyn-2-amine | 680 | 763 | nd | RI, MS |
| 41 | Allylcyclohexylamine | 1168 | 1251 | nd | RI, MS |
| 42 | 1,5-Bis(3-ethylphenoxy)-1,1,3,3,5,5-hexamethyltrisiloxane | 2422 | 2511 | nd | RI, MS |
| 43 | 1,5-Bis(2,5-dimethylphenoxy)-1,1,3,3,5,5-hexamethyltrisiloxane | 2450 | 2539 | nd | RI, MS |
| 44 | 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7,9,9,11,11-Dodecamethylhexasiloxane | 1341 | 1430 | t | RI, MS |
| 45 | 2,3,4,5-Tetraethyl-7,7-diphenylbicyclo[4.1.0]hepta-2,4-diene | 2743 | 2798 | t | RI, MS |
| 46 | 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7,9,9,11,11,13,13-Tetradecamethylheptasiloxane | 1526 | 1615 | t | RI, MS |
| 47 | Eugenol | 1392 | 1364 | 17.52 | RI, MS |
| 48 | Linalool | 1082 | 1100 | 12.31 | RI, MS |
| 49 | Estragole | 1172 | 1178 | 7.20 | RI, MS |
| 50 | Linalyl acetate | 1272 | 1254 | 30.43 | RI, MS |
RI: Retention, LRI: Literature retention index, t: Trace (<0.05%), nd: not detected, MS: Mass spectrometry (GC/MS).
Scheme 2GC-MS chromatogram of Nigella sativa Eos.
Chemical composition of N. sativa EOs.
| Quantitative ID | Component Identified | RI | LRI | Area (%) | Identification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | β-Thujene | 873 | 920 | t | RI, MS |
| 2 | α-Thujene | 902 | 926 | 2.061 | RI, MS |
| 3 | α-Phellandrene | 969 | 1005 | t | RI, MS |
| 4 | p-Cymene | 1042 | 1021 | 7.244 | RI, MS |
| 5 | Thymoquinone | 1340 | 1276 | 1.145 | RI, MS |
| 6 | 4,4a,5,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4a-methyl-2(3H)-naphthalinone | 1357 | 1414 | t | RI, MS |
| 7 | 4-(3-Methyl-2-butenyl)-4-cyclopentene-1,3-dione | 1397 | 1454 | t | RI, MS |
| 8 | 2(5H)-Furanone, 4-(2,3-dimethyl-2-buten-4-yl)-5-methoxy- | 1493 | 1582 | t | RI, MS |
| 9 | (11E,13Z)-1,11,13-Hexadecatriene | 1618 | 1657 | t | RI, MS |
| 10 | 9-Hexadecenal | 1808 | 1805 | t | RI, MS |
| Pentadecanoic acid | 1869 | 1865 | t | RI, MS | |
| 11 | Palmitic acid | 1968 | 1963 | 9.936 | RI, MS |
| 12 | cis-10-Heptadecenoic acid | 2075 | 2073 | t | RI, MS |
| 13 | Methyl linoleate | 2093 | 2087 | t | RI, MS |
| 14 | Oleic acid chloride | 2131 | 2220 | 0.31 | RI, MS |
| 15 | Stearic acid | 2167 | 2161 | 1.311 | RI, MS |
| 16 | Oleic Acid | 2175 | 2171 | t | RI, MS |
| 17 | Linoleic acid | 2183 | 2134 | 56.630 | RI, MS |
| 18 | cis-11-Eicosenoic acid | 2374 | 2362 | t | RI, MS |
| 19 | 2-Chloroethyl linoleate | 2418 | 2458 | t | RI, MS |
| 20 | Erucic acid | 2572 | 2546 | 13.042 | RI, MS |
| 21 | 1-Oleoyl-rac-glycerol | 2689 | 2714 | t | RI, MS |
| 22 | 2-Oleoylglycerol | 2705 | 2780 | t | RI, MS |
| 23 | Trielaidin | 6149 | 6189 | 8.628 | RI, MS |
RI: Retention index, LRI: Literature retention index, t: Trace (<0.05%), MS: Mass spectrometry (GC/MS).
Scheme 3GC-MS chromatogram of L. angustifolia EOs.
Chemical composition of L. angustifolia EOs.
| Quantitative ID | Component Identified | RI | LRI | Area (%) | Identification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hexanal | 806 | 819 | 10.44 | RI, MS |
| 2 | Cyclobutanol | 828 | 668 | t | RI, MS |
| 3 | Eucalyptol | 1059 | 1030 | 8.940 | RI, MS |
| 4 | Trifluoroacetyl-.alpha.-terpineol | 1167 | 1167 | t | RI, MS |
| 5 | Lavandulyl acetate | 1270 | 1273 | 19.24 | RI, MS |
| 6 | Linalool acetate | 1272 | 1261 | t | RI, MS |
| 7 | Eugenol | 1392 | 1356 | 29.35 | RI, MS |
| 8 | Isoeugenol | 1410 | 1451 | t | RI, MS |
| 9 | Linalyl butyrate | 1471 | 1422 | t | RI, MS |
| 10 | Bicyclo[10.1.0]tridec-1-ene | 1472 | 1472 | 14.69 | RI, MS |
| Hexyl cyclohexanecarboxylate | 1544 | 1509 | nd | RI, MS | |
| 11 | Eugenol acetate | 1552 | 1523 | t | RI, MS |
| 12 | 8-Hexadecyne | 1629 | 1629 | 1.031 | RI, MS |
| 13 | 9,12-Tetradecadien-1-ol, (Z,E)- | 1672 | 1677 | t | RI, MS |
| 14 | 9-Hexadecyn-1-ol | 1872 | 1863 | t | RI, MS |
| 15 | 9-Hexadecenoic acid | 1976 | 1953 | 0.65 | RI, MS |
| 16 | Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid | 2031 | 2084 | nd | RI, MS |
| 17 | 1,6-Octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, 2-aminobenzoate | 2157 | 2175 | 15.35 | RI, MS |
| 18 | Vaccenic acid | 2175 | 2141 | t | RI, MS |
| 19 | Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 2-tridecyl ester | 2176 | 2168 | nd | RI, MS |
| 20 | Linoleic acid | 2183 | 2128 | 12.76 | RI, MS |
| 21 | Oxacycloheptadec-8-en-2-one | 2246 | 2206 | t | RI, MS |
| 22 | cis-10-Nonadecenoic acid | 2274 | 2225 | t | RI, MS |
| 23 | Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 2-tetradecyl ester | 2275 | 2267 | nd | RI, MS |
| 24 | 2-cis,cis-9,12-Octadecadienyloxyethanol | 2344 | 2344 | t | RI, MS |
| 25 | 9-Decenyl laurate | 2365 | 2365 | nd | RI, MS |
| 26 | cis-11-Eicosenoic acid | 2374 | 2362 | 13.48 | RI, MS |
| 27 | Erucic acid | 2572 | 2546 | 0.23 | RI, MS |
| 28 | cis-13,16-Docasadienoic acid | 2580 | 2566 | t | RI, MS |
| 29 | Isocaryophyllene | 1434 | 1427 | 2.67 | RI, MS |
RI: Retention index, LRI: Literature retention index, t: Trace (<0.05%), nd: not detected, MS: Mass spectrometry (GC/MS).
Total phenol content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC) and free radical scavenging capacity (DPPH) from basil, black seeds and lavender EOs.
| Phytochemistry | Basil | Black Seeds | Lavender |
|---|---|---|---|
| TPC (mg GAE/g) | 31.4 | 17.8 | 23.4 |
| TFC (mg RE/g) | 17.6 | 9.7 | 12.5 |
| DPPH (%) | 18.9 | 16.4 | 11.2 |
Figure 1Impact of different concentrations (2, 4 and 6 mg/cm2) from O. basilicum EOs on mortality of S. oryzae adults at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h exposure times (mean ± SD) compared with standard chemical pesticide (10 ppm malathion). Different letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at p < 0.05; LSD = 0.036.
Figure 2Impact of different concentrations (2, 4, and 6 mg/cm2) from N. sativa EOs on mortality of S. oryzae adults at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h exposure times (mean ± SD) compared with standard chemical pesticide (10 ppm malathion). Different letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at p < 0.05; LSD = 0.016.
Figure 3Impact of different concentrations (2, 4, and 6 mg/cm2) from L. angustifolia EOs on mortality of S. oryzae adults at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h exposure times (mean ± SD) compared with standard chemical pesticide (10 ppm malathion). Different letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at p < 0.05; LSD = 0.115.
Figure 4Impact of different concentrations (0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 mg/cm2) from O. basilicum EOs on repellent % of S. oryzae adults at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h exposure times (mean ± SD) compared with standard chemical pesticide (4 ppm malathion). Different letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at p < 0.05; LSD = 0.157.
Figure 5Impact of different concentrations (0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 mg/cm2) from N. sativa EOs on repellent % of S. oryzae adults at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h exposure times (mean ± SD) compared with standard chemical pesticide (4 ppm malathion). Different letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at p < 0.05; LSD = 0.127.
Figure 6Impact of different concentrations (0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 mg/cm2) from L. angustifolia EOs and on repellent % of S. oryzae adults at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h exposure times (mean ± SD) compared with standard chemical pesticide (4 ppm malathion). Different letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at p < 0.05; LSD = 0. 0.157.
Figure 7Relative gene expression of DEGs gene (CL8) gene in S. oryzae adults after 1 and 2 h treated with 6 mg/cm2 of O. basilicum, N. sativa, and L. angustifolia EOs (mean ± SD) compared with standard chemical insecticide (10 ppm malathion). Different letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at p < 0.05.
Figure 8Relative gene expression of CYP4Q4 gene in S. oryzae adults after 1 and 2 h treated with 6 mg/cm2 of O. basilicum, N. sativa and L. angustifolia EOs (mean ± SD) compared with standard chemical insecticide (10 ppm malathion). Different letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at p < 0.05.
Figure 9Relative gene expression of CL 1294 gene in S. oryzae adults after 1 and 2 h treated with 6 mg/cm2 of O. basilicum, N. sativa, and L. angustifolia EOs (mean ± SD) compared with standard chemical insecticide (10 ppm malathion). Different letters indicate significant differences between different treatments at p < 0.05.