Literature DB >> 15364527

Investigating the environmental transport of human pharmaceuticals to streams in the United Kingdom.

D Ashton1, M Hilton, K V Thomas.   

Abstract

The occurrence of 12 selected pharmaceutical compounds and pharmaceutical compound metabolites in sewage treatment works (STW) effluents and surface waters was investigated. The substances selected for the monitoring programme were identified by a risk ranking procedure to identify those substances with the greatest potential to pose a risk to the aquatic environment. STW final effluent and surface water samples were collected from Corby, Great Billing, East Hyde, Harpenden and Ryemeads STWs. Ten of the 12 pharmaceutical compounds were detected in the STW effluent samples: propranolol (100%, median = 76 ng/l), diclofenac (86%, median = 424 ng/l), ibuprofen (84%, median = 3086 ng/l), mefenamic acid (81%, median = 133 ng/l), dextropropoxyphene (74%, median = 195 ng/l), trimethoprim (65%, 70 ng/l), erythromycin (44%, < 10 ng/l), acetyl-sulfamethoxazole (33%, median =< 50 ng/l), sulfamethoxazole (9%, median =< 50 ng/l), tamoxifen (4%, median =< 10 ng/l). In the corresponding receiving streams, fewer compounds and lower concentrations were found: propranolol (87%, median = 29 ng/l), ibuprofen (69%, median = 826 ng/l), mefenamic acid (60%, median = 62 ng/l), dextropropoxyphene (53%, median = 58 ng/l), diclofenac (47%, median =< 20 ng/l), erythromycin (38%, median =< 10 ng/l), trimethoprim (38%, median =< 10 ng/l), acetyl sulfamethoxazole (38%, median =< 50 ng/l). Four human pharmaceutical compounds were detected in samples upstream of the STWs sampled: ibuprofen (57%, median = 181 ng/l), trimethoprim (36%, median < 10 ng/l), erythromycin (17%, median =< 10 ng/l), propranolol (14%, median =< 10 ng/l), suggesting that longer range stream transport of some compounds is possible. The particular STW that was sampled and the month that it was sampled significantly influenced the measured concentrations of several, but not all, substances. There was no significant relationship between usage data and the overall frequency with which different substances were detected. There was however, some evidence to suggest that usage data are positively associated with concentrations of pharmaceuticals in effluent and, particularly, with concentrations measured in surface waters below STWs. These results suggest that most sewage treatment works in England and Wales are likely to be routinely discharging small quantities of pharmaceuticals into UK rivers. None of the pharmaceuticals were found at concentrations that were high enough to cause acute toxic impacts to aquatic organisms. However, insufficient data were available to be able to comment on whether the concentrations measured have the potential to result in more subtle long-term effects on aquatic organisms (e.g. effects on growth, ability to reproduce).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15364527     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  60 in total

1.  Monitoring the effects of chiral pharmaceuticals on aquatic microorganisms by metabolic fingerprinting.

Authors:  Emma S Wharfe; Catherine L Winder; Roger M Jarvis; Royston Goodacre
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Occurrence and distribution of selected pharmaceuticals and personal care products in aquatic environments: a comparative study of regions in China with different urbanization levels.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Xiaojuan Li; Saichang Zhu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Soil bacterial consortia and previous exposure enhance the biodegradation of sulfonamides from pig manure.

Authors:  Marina Islas-Espinoza; Brian J Reid; Margaret Wexler; Philip L Bond
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  A method to include the environmental hazard in drug prescribing.

Authors:  Staffan Castensson; Viktoria Eriksson; Kristina Lindborg; Björn Wettermark
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2008-11-27

5.  Occurrence and fate of selected anticancer, antimicrobial, and psychotropic pharmaceuticals in an urban river in a subcatchment of the Yodo River basin, Japan.

Authors:  Takashi Azuma; Hirotaka Ishiuchi; Tomomi Inoyama; Yusuke Teranishi; Misato Yamaoka; Takaji Sato; Yoshiki Mino
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Introduction of human pharmaceuticals from wastewater treatment plants into the aquatic environment: a rural perspective.

Authors:  Carolina Nebot; Raquel Falcon; Kenneth G Boyd; Stuart W Gibb
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Identification and quantification of 19 pharmaceutical active compounds and metabolites in hospital wastewater in Cameroon using LC/QQQ and LC/Q-TOF.

Authors:  Edwige Vanessa Tchadji Mayoudom; Evrard Nguidjoe; Rose Ngono Mballa; Olivia Fossi Tankoua; Charles Fokunang; Chimezie Anyakora; Kathleen Ngu Blackett
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  A toxicity and hazard assessment of fourteen pharmaceuticals to Xenopus laevis larvae.

Authors:  Sean M Richards; Shaun E Cole
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Pharmaceutical formulation facilities as sources of opioids and other pharmaceuticals to wastewater treatment plant effluents.

Authors:  Patrick J Phillips; Steven G Smith; D W Kolpin; Steven D Zaugg; Herbert T Buxton; Edward T Furlong; Kathleen Esposito; Beverley Stinson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Effects of soil moisture depletion on vegetable crop uptake of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs).

Authors:  Sergio Santiago; Deborah M Roll; Chittaranjan Ray; Clinton Williams; Philip Moravcik; Allan Knopf
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.