| Literature DB >> 33919271 |
Daniel M Walden1, Maksim Khotimchenko1, Hypatia Hou1, Kaushik Chakravarty1, Jyotika Varshney1.
Abstract
Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are a widespread class of broad-spectrum antibiotics prescribed as a first line of defense, and, in some cases, as the only treatment against bacterial infection. However, when administered orally, reduced absorption and bioavailability can occur due to chelation in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) with multivalent metal cations acquired from diet, coadministered compounds (sucralfate, didanosine), or drug formulation. Predicting the extent to which this interaction reduces in vivo antibiotic absorption and systemic exposure remains desirable yet challenging. In this study, we focus on quinolone interactions with magnesium, calcium and aluminum as found in dietary supplements, antacids (Maalox) orally administered therapies (sucralfate, didanosine). The effect of FQ-metal complexation on absorption rate was investigated through a combined molecular and pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling study. Quantum mechanical calculations elucidated FQ-metal binding energies, which were leveraged to predict the magnitude of reduced bioavailability via a quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR). This work will help inform clinical FQ formulation design, alert to possible dietary effects, and shed light on drug-drug interactions resulting from coadministration at an earlier stage in the drug development pipeline.Entities:
Keywords: antacids; antibiotics; bioavailability; fluoroquinolones; molecular modeling; multivalent metals; oral absorption; pharmacokinetics
Year: 2021 PMID: 33919271 PMCID: PMC8143323 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13050594
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Figure 1Shared core scaffold of quinolone antibacterial compounds. X = N indicates 1,8-naphthyridine, X = C defines quinolones. R6 = F defines fluoroquinolones.
Physicochemical properties of the fluoroquinolones studied in this manuscript.
| Generation | Fluoroquinolone | Structure | MW | TPSA | Calculated log |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Second | Ciprofloxacin |
| 331.13 | 74.57 | 1.58 |
| Second | Enoxacin |
| 320.13 | 87.46 | 0.66 |
| Second | Fleroxacin |
| 369.13 | 65.78 | 1.70 |
| Second | Lomefloxacin |
| 351.14 | 74.57 | 1.80 |
| Second | Norfloxacin |
| 319.13 | 74.57 | 1.27 |
| Second | Ofloxacin |
| 361.14 | 75.01 | 1.54 |
| Second | Pefloxacin |
| 333.15 | 65.78 | 1.61 |
| Second | Rufloxacin |
| 363.11 | 91.08 | 1.70 |
| Third | Levofloxacin |
| 361.14 | 75.01 | 1.54 |
| Third | Sparfloxacin |
| 392.17 | 100.59 | 2.08 |
| Third | Tosufloxacin |
| 404.11 | 101.45 | 2.04 |
| Fourth | Gatifloxacin |
| 375.16 | 83.8 | 1.98 |
| Fourth | Moxifloxacin |
| 401.18 | 83.8 | 2.37 |
MW: molecular weight (g/mol); TPSA: topological polar surface area in square Ångstroms (Å2) with O, N, S, P atoms considered polar; logP: logarithm of the partition coefficient between octanol and water; See Section 2.2 for additional details on physicochemical property calculations.
Relative change of fluoroquinolone pharmacokinetic parameters upon coadministration with antacids and drug products containing multivalent metals.
| Relative Change (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluoroquinolone | Multivalent Metal | Metal Source |
| AUC | Calculated | Reference |
| Ciprofloxacin | Aluminum | Aluminum hydroxide | −81.1 | −84.6 | −14.3 | [ |
| Aluminum | Aluminum hydroxide | −84.6 | −87.5 | −60.6 | [ | |
| Aluminum | Sucralfate | −90.0 | −87.5 | N/A | [ | |
| Aluminum/Magnesium | Maalox | −80.1 | −84.9 | 157.9 | [ | |
| Aluminum/Magnesium | Didanosine | −92.6 | −98.3 | 49.2 | [ | |
| Calcium | Titralac | −37.9 | −41.1 | 5.9 | [ | |
| Enoxacin | Aluminum | Aluminum hydroxide | −78.3 | −84.2 | N/A | [ |
| Aluminum/Magnesium | Maalox | −70.0 | −73.2 | −52.1 | [ | |
| Fleroxacin | Aluminum | Aluminum hydroxide | −25.0 | −17.2 | −47.6 | [ |
| Aluminum | Sucralfate | −26.4 | −24.0 | −40.3 | [ | |
| Lomefloxacin | Aluminum | Aluminum hydroxide | −54.5 | −34.8 | −55.1 | [ |
| Aluminum | Kolantyl | −46.1 | −40.8 | 25.6 | [ | |
| Norfloxacin | Aluminum | Aluminum hydroxide | −93.3 | −97.0 | N/A | [ |
| Aluminum | Sucralfate | −92.2 | −91.3 | −23.8 | [ | |
| Aluminum/Magnesium | Maalox | −95.1 | N/A | −6.1 | [ | |
| Calcium | Titralac | −65.9 | −62.6 | −80.2 | [ | |
| Ofloxacin | Aluminum | Aluminum hydroxide | −59.4 | −47.9 | −65.0 | [ |
| Aluminum | Sucralfate | −69.5 | −61.0 | −46.2 | [ | |
| Pefloxacin | Aluminum/Magnesium | Maalox | −60.8 | −54.3 | −57.5 | [ |
| Rufloxacin | Aluminum/Magnesium | Maalox | 6.1 | −15.2 | −34.0 | [ |
| Levofloxacin | Aluminum | Aluminum hydroxide | −66.7 | −45.2 | −55.5 | [ |
| Sparfloxacin | Aluminum | Aluminum hydroxide | −22.2 | −35.1 | 47.1 | [ |
| Tosufloxacin | Aluminum | Aluminum hydroxide | −66.7 | −70.8 | −67.4 | [ |
| Gatifloxacin | Aluminum/Magnesium | Maalox | −68.4 | −60.8 | −13.5 | [ |
| Moxifloxacin | Aluminum | Sucralfate | −79.5 | −59.9 | −80.7 | [ |
| Calcium | Calcium-Sandoz | −15.5 | −2.4 | −74.1 | [ | |
N/A: not available; Cmax: maximum plasma concentration (µg∙mL−1); AUC: area-under-the-curve of the concentration plasma profile (µg∙h∙mL−1); Calculated ka: calculated absorption rate constant (h−1) using Equations (1) and (2) and the methods outlined in Section 2.1 of this manuscript.
Figure 2Computed structures and predicted free energies of binding (∆Gbind) between N-protonated cationic ciprofloxacin and (A) aluminum hydrate, (B) magnesium hydrate, and (C) calcium hydrate. Structural images generated using CYLView [70].
Figure 3Plots of relative percent change in bioavailability (AUC) versus (A) molecular weight, (B) topological polar surface area (TPSA) [45], (C) predicted logP from chemical structure (Wildman–Crippen model) [46], and (D) computed complexation energy (ΔEbind) to aluminum hexahydrate. Changes in AUC on the y-axis are from FQ coadministration with aluminum hydroxide [71] or Maalox.