Literature DB >> 33919108

The Effect of Er:YAG Laser on a Shear Bond Strength Value of Orthodontic Brackets to Enamel-A Preliminary Study.

Jan Kiryk1, Jacek Matys1, Anna Nikodem2, Karolina Burzyńska2, Kinga Grzech-Leśniak1,3, Marzena Dominiak1, Maciej Dobrzyński4.   

Abstract

We sought to evaluate the effects of Er:YAG laser (LightTouch, LightInstruments, Israel) conditioning on enamel roughness and shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets on enamel. Eighteen human molars (n = 9) and premolars (n = 9), were divided into 3 groups depending on the enamel conditioning method; Er:YAG laser (G1, n = 6), conventional etching with 37% orthophosphoric acid (G2, n = 6), Er:YAG laser combined with conventional etching (G3, n = 6). Er:YAG laser parameters were as follows: energy: 100 mJ, frequency: 10 Hz, exposure time: 10 s, applicator diameter: 600 μm, fluence: 35.37 J/cm2, distance: 1 mm away from a tooth, cooling: 80%. An MTS 858 MiniBionix® machine was used to determine the shear bond strength (MTS System, Eden Prairie, MN, USA). The enamel structure was assessed using X-ray microtomography (SkyScan 1172, Bruker, Kontich, Belgium). The highest values of shear bond strength were obtained in the G3 group (9.23 ± 2.38 MPa) and the lowest values in the G2 group (6.44 ± 2.11 MPa) (p < 0.05). A significant change in the enamel surface was noted after applying laser, reaching up to 9% of enamel thickness, which was not observed in the etched samples. Moreover, the Er:YAG laser-irradiated enamel surface was characterized by the greatest roughness. The combined use of an Er:YAG laser with a conventional etching improves the adhesion of composite materials to the tooth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  microtomography; orthodontic brackets; roughness; shear strength; surface conditioning

Year:  2021        PMID: 33919108     DOI: 10.3390/ma14092093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Materials (Basel)        ISSN: 1996-1944            Impact factor:   3.623


  26 in total

1.  Atomic analysis and knoop hardness measurement of the cavity floor prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in vitro.

Authors:  M Hossain; Y Nakamura; Y Tamaki; Y Yamada; Y Murakami; K Matsumoto
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.837

2.  Bond strengths of orthodontic bracket after acid-etched, Er:YAG laser-irradiated and combined treatment on enamel surface.

Authors:  Bor-Shiunn Lee; Tseng-Ting Hsieh; Yuan-Ling Lee; Wan-Hong Lan; Yao-Jeng Hsu; Ping-Han Wen; Chun-Pin Lin
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Shear bond strength to enamel of primary teeth irradiated with varying Er:YAG laser energies and SEM examination of the surface morphology: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Rosimeyri L Wanderley; Elisângela M Monghini; Jesus D Pecora; Regina G Palma-Dibb; Maria C Borsatto
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Comparison of sandblasting, laser irradiation, and conventional acid etching for orthodontic bonding of molar tubes.

Authors:  Nuket Berk; Güvenç Başaran; Törün Ozer
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Alternatives in enamel conditioning: a comparison of conventional and innovative methods.

Authors:  A Moritz; N Gutknecht; U Schoop; K Goharkhay; J Wernisch; W Sperr
Journal:  J Clin Laser Med Surg       Date:  1996-06

6.  Effect of diode lasers with wavelength of 445 and 980 nm on a temperature rise when uncovering implants for second stage surgery: An ex-vivo study in pigs.

Authors:  Jacek Matys; Rafał Flieger; Marzena Dominiak
Journal:  Adv Clin Exp Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.727

7.  Differences in bonding to acid-etched or Er:YAG-laser-treated enamel and dentin surfaces.

Authors:  A Martínez-Insua; L Da Silva Dominguez; F G Rivera; U A Santana-Penín
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Adhesive systems effect over bond strength of resin-infiltrated and de/remineralized enamel.

Authors:  Alessandra Buhler Borges; Amjad Abu Hasna; Amanda Guedes Nogueira Matuda; Stephanie Ribeiro Lopes; Ana Paula Valente Pinho Mafetano; Aline Arantes; Angélica Ferreira Duarte; Daphne Camara Barcellos; Carlos Rocha Gomes Torres; Cesar Rogério Pucci
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-10-11

9.  Removal of Composite Restoration from the Root Surface in the Cervical Region Using Er: YAG Laser and Drill-In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Wojciech Zakrzewski; Maciej Dobrzynski; Piotr Kuropka; Jacek Matys; Malgorzata Malecka; Jan Kiryk; Zbigniew Rybak; Marzena Dominiak; Kinga Grzech-Lesniak; Katarzyna Wiglusz; Rafal J Wiglusz
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Bonding Interaction and Shrinkage Stress of Low-viscosity Bulk Fill Resin Composites With High-viscosity Bulk Fill or Conventional Resin Composites.

Authors:  E R Cerda-Rizo; M de Paula Rodrigues; Abf Vilela; Ssl Braga; Lrs Oliveira; T C Garcia-Silva; C J Soares
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.440

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical effects of laser-based cavity preparation on class V resin-composite fillings.

Authors:  Markus Heyder; Bernd Sigusch; Christoph Hoder-Przyrembel; Juliane Schuetze; Stefan Kranz; Markus Reise
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.