Literature DB >> 18263892

Comparison of sandblasting, laser irradiation, and conventional acid etching for orthodontic bonding of molar tubes.

Nuket Berk1, Güvenç Başaran, Törün Ozer.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine if sandblasted and laser-irradiated enamel may be viable alternatives to acid etching for molar tube bonding. Seventy-seven molar teeth extracted for periodontal reasons were used. Seventy teeth underwent shear bond strength (SBS) testing and the remaining seven were examined under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were also considered. An erbium, chromium-doped:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er, Cr: YSGG) laser was used for enamel etching. Sandblasted and laser-irradiated enamel surfaces with different power outputs (0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, and 2 W) were compared with conventional phosphoric acid etching. Descriptive statistics, including mean, standard deviation, and minimum and maximum values, were calculated for each group. Multiple comparisons of the SBS of different etching types were performed by analysis of variance testing. The chi-square test was used to evaluate differences in ARI scores between groups. Acid-etched, 1-, 1.5-, and 2-W laser irradiation groups demonstrated a clinically acceptable mean SBS (7.65 +/- 1.38, 6.69 +/- 1.27, 7.13 +/- 1.67, 7.17 +/- 1.69 MPa, respectively). Irradiation with an output of 0.5 and 0.75 W and sandblasting of the enamel showed a lower SBS than the other groups (2.94 +/- 1.98, 4.16 +/- 2.87, 2.01 +/- 0.64 MPa, respectively). SEM evaluation of 1, 1.5, and 2 W laser irradiation revealed similar etching patterns to acid etching. Sandblasting and 0.5, and 0.75 W laser etching were not able to etch enamel in preferential patterns. Laser irradiation at 1.5 and 2 W was able to etch enamel. More adhesive was left on the enamel surface with low-power laser irradiation. Sandblasting and low-power laser irradiation (0.5, 0.75, and 1 W) are not capable of etching enamel suitable for orthodontic molar tube bonding, but 1.5- and 2-W laser irradiation may be an alternative to conventional acid etching.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18263892     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjm103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  30 in total

1.  Comparison of microtensile bond strength of a resin composite to enamel conditioned by acid etching and Er,Cr:YSGG laser in human primary teeth.

Authors:  B Malekafzali; R Fekrazad; A Mirfasihi; S Saedi
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2014-11-01

2.  Influence of different power outputs of erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser and acid etching on shear bond strengths of a dual-cure resin cement to enamel.

Authors:  Emine Göncü Başaran; Emrah Ayna; Güvenç Başaran; Köksal Beydemir
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Porcelain laminate veneer conditioning for orthodontic bonding: SEM-EDX analysis.

Authors:  Sertac Aksakalli; Zehra Ileri; Tevfik Yavuz; Meral Arslan Malkoc; Nilgun Ozturk
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Use of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser for removing remnant adhesive from the enamel surface in rebonding of orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Katsunori Koide; Satoshi Tanaka; Toshiya Endo
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.634

5.  Comparison of shear bond strength of reattached incisor fragment using Er,Cr:YSGG laser etching and conventional acid etching: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Ferah Rehman; Gyanendra Kumar; Mridula Goswami; Jatinder Kaur Dhillon
Journal:  Laser Ther       Date:  2016-06-29

6.  Comparative study of the effect of Er:YAG and Er:Cr;YSGG lasers on porcelain: etching for the bonding of orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Amirhossein Mirhashemi; Nasim Chiniforush; Hanieh Jadidi; Nastaran Sharifi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Different pulse modes of Er:YAG laser irradiation: effects on bond strength achieved with self-etching primers.

Authors:  Mehmet Akin; Ilknur Veli; Emire Aybuke Erdur; Sertac Aksakalli; Tancan Uysal
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Er,Cr:YSGG Laser as a Novel Method for Rebonding Failed Ceramic Brackets.

Authors:  Aydin Sohrabi; Sanaz Jafari; Soodabeh Kimyai; Sahand Rikhtehgaran
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Evaluation of bond strength of resin cement to Er:YAG laser-etched enamel and dentin after cementation of ceramic discs.

Authors:  Artur Ismatullaev; Simge Taşın; Aslihan Usumez
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.161

10.  Comparative efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG and Er:YAG lasers for etching of composite for orthodontic bracket bonding.

Authors:  Amir Hossein Mirhashemi; Nasim Chiniforush; Nastaran Sharifi; Amir Mehdi Hosseini
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.