| Literature DB >> 33918957 |
Ioana Vaida1, Florin Păcurar1, Ioan Rotar1, Liviu Tomoș1, Vlad Stoian2.
Abstract
High nature value (HNV) grassland systems are increasingly important for the ecosystem services they provide and for their socio-economic impact in the current constant-changing context. The aim of our paper is to evaluate the long-term effect of organic fertilizers on HNV systems in the Apuseni Mountains, Romania. As an objective we want to identify the optimal intensity of conservation management and its recognition based on indicator value plant species. The experiments were established in 2001 on the boreal floor and analyze the effect of a gradient of four organic treatments with manure. Fertilization with 10 t ha-1 manure ensures an increase in yield and has a small influence on diversity, and could be a real possibility for the maintenance and sustainable use of HNV. Each fertilization treatment determined species with indicator value that are very useful in the identification and management of HNV. The indicator species are useful in forecasting the fluctuations and successions in grasslands, determined by the modification of the dominance-codominance ratio and the real coverage of each species.Entities:
Keywords: agro-ecological spectrum; fertilizer gradient; indicator species; long-term observations; phytodiversity
Year: 2021 PMID: 33918957 PMCID: PMC8069202 DOI: 10.3390/plants10040739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Floristic classification of the vegetation and the changes of grassland type. Legend: Manag = management; V1—control; V2—10 t ha−1 manure; V3—20 t ha−1 manure; V4—30 t ha−1 manure; 15, 16, 17—the three experimental years—2015, 2016, 2017; R1–4—replications.
Figure 2PCoA of grassland type modified by organic inputs. Legend: Manag = management; V1—control; V2—10 t ha−1 manure; V3—20 t ha−1 manure; V4—30 t ha−1 manure; 2015, 2016, 2017—the three experimental years.
Correlation of experimental factors with the ordination axis.
| Experimental Factors | Axis 1 | Axis 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Significance |
| Significance | |
| Control | 0.867 | - | −0.419 | - |
| 10 t ha−1 manure | 0.157 | ns | 0.741 | *** |
| 20 t ha−1 manure | −0.430 | * | 0.291 | ns |
| 30t ha−1 manure | −0.594 | ** | −0.613 | *** |
| Axis importance | 94.0% | 1.5% | ||
Note: r—correlation coefficient between ordination distances and original distances in n-dimensional space; Significance: p < 0.001 ***; p < 0.01 **; p < 0.05 *; ns—not significant.
Three-year comparison of floristic composition changes due to applied treatments (MRPP).
| Treatments | T | A | |
|---|---|---|---|
| V1_2015 vs. V1_2016 | −0.230 | 0.005 | 0.406 |
| V1_2015 vs. V1_2017 | −0.369 | 0.009 | 0.347 |
| V2_2015 vs. V2_2016 | −2.238 | 0.078 | 0.022 * |
| V2_2015 vs. V2_2017 | −0.772 | 0.027 | 0.213 |
| V3_2015 vs. V3_2016 | 1.228 | −0.034 | 0.913 |
| V3_2015 vs. V3_2017 | 0.424 | −0.012 | 0.641 |
| V4_2015 vs. V4_2016 | 1.555 | −0.051 | 0.946 |
| V4_2015 vs. V4_2017 | −0.702 | 0.038 | 0.035 * |
Note: V1—control; V2—10 t ha−1 manure; V3—20 t ha−1 manure; V4—30 t ha−1 manure; T—T test, A—group homogeneity; Significance: p < 0.05 *; ns—not significant.
Figure 3The influence of floristic composition determined by different treatments of manure. Legend: Manag = Management; V1—control; V2—10 t ha−1 manure; V3—20 t ha−1 manure; V4—30 t ha−1 manure. Agrocapi—Agrostis capillaris L.; Alchvulg—Alchemilla vulgaris L.; Anthodor—Anthoxanthum odoratum L.; Camppatu—Campanula patula L.; Carepall—Carex pallescens L.; Centpseu—Centaurea pseudophrygia C. A. Mey.; Colcautu—Colchicum autumnale L.; Crepbien—Crepis biennis L.; Dactglom—Dactylis glomerata L.; Festprat—Festuca pratensis Huds.; Festrubr—Festuca rubra L.; Gymncono—Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) R. Br.; Hieraura—Hieracium aurantiacum L.; Hierpilo—Hieracium pilosella L.; Hypemacu—Hypericum maculatum Crantz; Leonautu—Leontodon autumnalis L.; Leucvulg—Leucanthemum vulgare Lam.; Lotucorn—Lotus corniculatus L.; Luzumult—Luzula multiflora (Ehrh.) Lej.; Pimpmajo—Pimpinella major (L.) Huds.; Planlanc—Plantago lanceolata L.; Planmedi—Plantago media L.; Poativia—Poa trivialis L.; Polycomo—Polygala comosa Schkuhr; Polyvulg—Polygala vulgaris L.; Poteerec—Potentilla erecta (L.) Raeusch.; Ranuacri—Ranunculus acris L.; Ranubulb—Ranunculus bulbosus L.; Rhinmino—Rhinanthus minor L.; Rumeacet—Rumex acetosella L.; Scabcolu—Scabiosa columbaria L.; Stelgram—Stellaria graminea L.; Taraoffi—Taraxacum officinale Weber; Thympule—Thymus pulegioides L.; Tragprat—Tragopogon pratensis L.; Trifprat—Trifolium pratense L.; Trifrepe—Trifolium repens L.; Trisflav—Trisetum flavescens (L.) P. Beauv.; Verocham—Veronica chamaedrys L.; Vicicrac—Vicia cracca L.; Violdecl—Viola declinata L.
Comparison of floristic composition changes due to applied treatments (MRPP).
| Treatments | T | A | |
|---|---|---|---|
| V1 vs. V2 | −14.92 | 0.295 | |
| V1 vs. V3 | −15.62 | 0.487 | |
| V1 vs. V4 | −15.69 | 0.529 | |
| V2 vs. V3 | −14.44 | 0.260 | |
| V2 vs. V4 | −15.29 | 0.364 | |
| V3 vs. V4 | −11.64 | 0.136 |
Note: T—T test, A—group homogeneity; Significance: p < 0.001 ***; p < 0.01 **; p < 0.05 *; ns—not significant.
Plant species correlation with the ordination axis in long term fertilized grassland.
| Species | Axis 1 | Axis 2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 0.692 | 0.479 | −0.599 | *** | 0.200 | 0.040 | −0.184 | ns | |
| −0.640 | 0.410 | 0.418 | *** | −0.312 | 0.097 | −0.203 | ns | |
| −0.594 | 0.353 | 0.605 | ** | −0.613 | 0.376 | 0.521 | *** | |
| 0.797 | 0.635 | −0.749 | *** | 0.256 | 0.065 | −0.098 | ns | |
| 0.854 | 0.730 | −0.804 | *** | 0.286 | 0.082 | −0.151 | ns | |
| −0.984 | 0.968 | 0.844 | *** | 0.027 | 0.001 | 0.198 | ns | |
| 0.595 | 0.354 | −0.713 | ** | 0.326 | 0.106 | −0.289 | ns | |
| 0.883 | 0.780 | −0.770 | *** | 0.092 | 0.009 | −0.108 | ns | |
| −0.887 | 0.786 | 0.715 | *** | −0.279 | 0.078 | 0.258 | ns | |
| −0.882 | 0.779 | 0.709 | *** | −0.233 | 0.054 | 0.217 | ns | |
| −0.380 | 0.144 | 0.309 | * | −0.305 | 0.093 | 0.241 | ns | |
| −0.066 | 0.004 | 0.206 | ns | −0.666 | 0.444 | 0.549 | *** | |
| −0.049 | 0.002 | 0.166 | ns | −0.806 | 0.650 | 0.671 | *** | |
| 0.635 | 0.403 | −0.532 | *** | 0.031 | 0.001 | 0.050 | ns | |
| 0.283 | 0.080 | −0.165 | ns | −0.509 | 0.260 | 0.360 | ** | |
| 0.055 | 0.003 | −0.019 | ns | 0.162 | 0.026 | −0.128 | ns | |
| 0.507 | 0.257 | −0.306 | ** | −0.583 | 0.340 | 0.398 | ** | |
| −0.613 | 0.375 | 0.470 | *** | 0.148 | 0.022 | −0.078 | ns | |
| 0.110 | 0.012 | −0.077 | ns | 0.129 | 0.017 | −0.110 | ns | |
| −0.637 | 0.406 | 0.469 | *** | 0.320 | 0.103 | −0.255 | ns | |
| −0.867 | 0.751 | 0.619 | *** | 0.419 | 0.176 | −0.304 | * | |
| −0.867 | 0.751 | 0.619 | *** | 0.419 | 0.176 | −0.304 | * | |
| −0.274 | 0.075 | 0.195 | ns | 0.280 | 0.079 | −0.215 | ns | |
| −0.669 | 0.447 | 0.710 | *** | 0.039 | 0.002 | 0.208 | ns | |
| −0.720 | 0.518 | 0.646 | *** | −0.292 | 0.085 | 0.276 | ns | |
| 0.581 | 0.337 | −0.479 | ** | 0.248 | 0.061 | −0.210 | ns | |
| −0.601 | 0.361 | 0.502 | *** | 0.255 | 0.065 | −0.162 | ns | |
| −0.649 | 0.421 | 0.454 | *** | 0.246 | 0.060 | −0.213 | ns | |
| −0.867 | 0.751 | 0.619 | *** | 0.304 | 0.176 | −0.304 | ns | |
| −0.594 | 0.353 | 0.605 | ** | −0.613 | 0.376 | 0.521 | *** | |
| −0.824 | 0.680 | 0.766 | *** | 0.218 | 0.047 | 0.099 | ns | |
| 0.209 | 0.044 | −0.108 | ns | −0.129 | 0.017 | 0.090 | ns | |
| −0.720 | 0.519 | 0.533 | *** | −0.086 | 0.007 | 0.083 | ns | |
| 0.718 | 0.515 | −0.535 | *** | 0.059 | 0.003 | 0.010 | ns | |
| −0.867 | 0.751 | 0.619 | *** | 0.419 | 0.176 | −0.304 | * | |
| −0.023 | 0.001 | 0.025 | ns | −0.240 | 0.057 | 0.205 | ns | |
| 0.702 | 0.493 | −0.554 | *** | −0.258 | 0.066 | 0.194 | ns | |
| −0.867 | 0.751 | 0.619 | *** | 0.419 | 0.176 | −0.304 | * | |
| 0.437 | 0.191 | −0.296 | * | −0.177 | 0.031 | 0.153 | ns | |
| 0.873 | 0.761 | −0.772 | *** | 0.211 | 0.044 | −0.174 | ns | |
| −0.645 | 0.416 | 0.605 | *** | 0.262 | 0.068 | −0.279 | ns | |
Note: r—Pearson correlation coefficient; r-sq—determination coefficient; tau— rank (Kendall’s tau) relationships between the ordination scores and the individual variables; Significance: p < 0.001 ***; p < 0.01 **; p < 0.05 *; ns—not significant.
Indicator value of species related to applied treatments.
| Species | V1 | V2 | V3 | V4 | Group Indval | Signif. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | 24 | 26 | 30 | 4 | ||
| 41 | 26 | 10 | 23 | 1 | ||
| 33 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 1 | 0.064 | |
| 0 | 8 | 41 | 51 | 4 | 0.001 | |
| 0 | 11 | 37 | 53 | 4 | ||
| 57 | 33 | 8 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 38 | 63 | 4 | ||
| 12 | 22 | 31 | 35 | 4 | 0.001 | |
| 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 52 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 32 | 41 | 14 | 14 | 2 | 0.034 | |
| 19 | 38 | 26 | 17 | 2 | ||
| 19 | 37 | 28 | 16 | 2 | ||
| 7 | 28 | 23 | 41 | 4 | 0.001 | |
| 12 | 37 | 30 | 21 | 2 | 0.009 | |
| 25 | 24 | 25 | 27 | 4 | 0.747 | |
| 16 | 28 | 34 | 22 | 3 | ||
| 38 | 25 | 19 | 18 | 1 | ||
| 25 | 15 | 35 | 25 | 3 | 0.275 | |
| 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.001 | |
| 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 34 | 21 | 21 | 25 | 1 | 0.040 | |
| 63 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 38 | 36 | 15 | 11 | 1 | 0.003 | |
| 19 | 18 | 31 | 31 | 3 | 0.026 | |
| 49 | 18 | 18 | 14 | 1 | ||
| 67 | 12 | 8 | 12 | 1 | ||
| 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 33 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 1 | 0.064 | |
| 76 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 18 | 18 | 46 | 18 | 3 | 0.013 | |
| 43 | 43 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0.001 | |
| 8 | 21 | 39 | 32 | 3 | 0.001 | |
| 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 21 | 36 | 21 | 21 | 2 | 0.227 | |
| 6 | 32 | 27 | 35 | 4 | 0.010 | |
| 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 2 | 0.895 | |
| 6 | 17 | 33 | 43 | 4 | ||
| 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Note: V1—control; V2—10 t ha−1 manure; V3—20 t ha−1 manure; V4—30 t ha−1 manure; Significance: p < 0.001 ***; p < 0.01 **; p < 0.05 *; ns—not significant.
The influence of organic fertilizer gradient over agro-ecologic spectra.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| V1 | 37.92 ± 1.88 a | 2.91 ± 0.08 a | 5.05 ± 0.06 b | 5.81 ± 0.19 a | 4.44 ± 0.14 c |
| V2 | 34.67 ± 0.49 b | 2.94 ± 0.05 a | 5.00 ± 0.07 b | 5.56 ± 0.13 b | 5.01 ± 0.11 b |
| V3 | 31.33 ± 0.49 c | 2.89 ± 0.08 a | 5.04 ± 0.08 b | 5.67 ± 0.15 ab | 5.17 ± 0.1 a |
| V4 | 29.67 ± 0.49 d | 2.72 ± 0.09 b | 5.11 ± 0.04 a | 5.76 ± 0.2 a | 5.26 ± 0.11 a |
|
| 386.80 | 30.91 | 5.98 | 0.04 | 139.53 |
|
| 0.018 | 0.842 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| V1 | 6.44 ± 0.1 ab | 5.29 ± 0.13 a | 4.73 ± 0.12 a | 5.39 ± 0.15 c | 2.01 ± 0.37 d |
| V2 | 6.5 ± 0.11 a | 4.87 ± 0.19 b | 4.53 ± 0.12 b | 5.82 ± 0.11 b | 3.42 ± 0.27 c |
| V3 | 6.37 ± 0.07 bc | 4.65 ± 0.12 c | 4.42 ± 0.07 c | 5.91 ± 0.17 ab | 4.31 ± 0.49 b |
| V4 | 6.33 ± 0.07 c | 4.62 ± 0.12 c | 4.38 ± 0.06 c | 6.03 ± 0.11 a | 4.77 ± 0.34 a |
|
| 13.01 | 98.79 | 78.95 | 91.91 | 261.12 |
|
| 0.001 |
Note: V1—control; V2—10 t ha−1 manure; V3—20 t ha−1 manure; V4—30 t ha−1 manure; Means ± s.e. followed by different letters indicate differences at p < 0.05 according to LSD test; Significance: p < 0.001 ***; p < 0.01 **; p < 0.05 *; ns—not significant. Spp. No—species number; Shannon—Shannon Index; U—Humidity; R—soil reaction; N—Trophicity; C—mowing; P—grazing; S—Crushing; VF—forage value; Yield—dry matter yield ha−1.
Figure 4Modified Braun-Blanquét scale for grasslands, based on species coverage (after [102]). Legend: 1 to 5 indicates the class of coverage; a, b, c indicates the sub-note of each class.
Modified Braun-Blanquét scale for assessing the abundance-dominance of plant species, based on classes and sub-classes (after [102]).
| Class | Coverage Interaval (%) | Class Central Value (%) | Sub-Note | Sub-Interval (%) | Central-Adjusted Value of Sub-Interval (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 75–100 | 87.5 | 5 c | 92–100 | 96 |
| 5 b | 83–92 | 87.5 | |||
| 5 a | 75–83 | 79 | |||
| 4 | 50–75 | 62.5 | 4 c | 67–75 | 71 |
| 4 b | 58–67 | 62.5 | |||
| 4 a | 50–58 | 54 | |||
| 3 | 25–50 | 37.5 | 3 c | 42–50 | 46 |
| 3 b | 33–42 | 37.5 | |||
| 3 a | 25–33 | 29 | |||
| 2 | 10–25 | 17.5 | 2 c | 20–25 | 22.25 |
| 2 b | 15–20 | 17.5 | |||
| 2 a | 10–15 | 12.5 | |||
| 1 | 1–10 | 5 | 1 c | 6–10 | 8 |
| 1 b | 4–6 | 5 | |||
| 1 a | 1–4 | 2.5 | |||
| + | 0.1–1 | 0.5 | - | - | 0.5 |
| r | 0.01–0.1 | 0.05 | - | - | 0.05 |
a, b, c indicates the sub-note of each class.