| Literature DB >> 33918690 |
Olga Yu Koval1, Vladimir V Fedorov1,2, Alexey D Bolshakov1,3, Igor E Eliseev1, Sergey V Fedina1, Georgiy A Sapunov1, Stanislav A Udovenko2, Liliia N Dvoretckaia1, Demid A Kirilenko4, Roman G Burkovsky2, Ivan S Mukhin1,3.
Abstract
Control and analysis of the crystal phase in semiconductor nanowires are of high importance due to the new possibilities for strain and band gap engineering for advanced nanoelectronic and nanophotonic devices. In this letter, we report the growth of the self-catalyzed GaP nanowires with a high concentration of wurtzite phase by molecular beam epitaxy on Si (111) and investigate their crystallinity. Varying the growth temperature and V/III flux ratio, we obtained wurtzite polytype segments with thicknesses in the range from several tens to 500 nm, which demonstrates the high potential of the phase bandgap engineering with highly crystalline self-catalyzed phosphide nanowires. The formation of rotational twins and wurtzite polymorph in vertical nanowires was observed through complex approach based on transmission electron microscopy, powder X-ray diffraction, and reciprocal space mapping. The phase composition, volume fraction of the crystalline phases, and wurtzite GaP lattice parameters were analyzed for the nanowires detached from the substrate. It is shown that the wurtzite phase formation occurs only in the vertically-oriented nanowires during vapor-liquid-solid growth, while the wurtzite phase is absent in GaP islands parasitically grown via the vapor-solid mechanism. The proposed approach can be used for the quantitative evaluation of the mean volume fraction of polytypic phase segments in heterostructured nanowires that are highly desirable for the optimization of growth technologies.Entities:
Keywords: GaP; Rietveld refinement; TEM; XRD; molecular-beam epitaxy; nanowire; wurtzite; zincblende
Year: 2021 PMID: 33918690 PMCID: PMC8070561 DOI: 10.3390/nano11040960
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1(a) schematic representation of the two-staged growth procedure; (b–d) Cross-sectional SEM-images of the studied GaP NW arrays.
Figure 2(a) dark-field TEM images obtained with WZ [100] reflection, (b) zoomed dark-field TEM image and corresponding electron diffraction patterns acquired from (c) ZB and (d) WZ GaP NW segments, taken along [ 10] [120] directions correspondingly. The inclined grey stripes appear due to the TEM CCD camera artifacts.
Figure 3TEM images of NW tips of the studied samples (a) Sample 1, (b) Sample 2 and (c) Sample 3—WZ phase is depicted with white arrows.
Figure 4(a) Two dimensional XRD reciprocal space cut along [11]Si and [111]Si directions obtained for Sample 2 with superimposed models of Si[10] (orange dots), ZB-GaP [10] (green circles), ZB-GaP 1st (blue dashed and violet circles) and 2nd order rotational twins (turquoise circles) and WZ-GaP [110] (red circles) zone axis patterns shown with coloured circles, (b) Line-cut of the RSM through the off-specular Si (220) diffraction reflex along the [111] direction, demonstrating the relative position of the ZB and WZ reflexes. Q⟂—perpendicular component of the diffraction vector.
Figure 5X-ray pole figure maps corresponding to (a) ZB-GaP {111} (d = 3.145 Å) and (b) WZ-GaP {102} Bragg reflections (d = 2.294 Å). The modeled reflection positions are shown with coloured circles, gradient colored arrows indicate the formation of rotational twins in ZB-GaP.
Figure 6(a) X-ray powder diffraction patterns of GaP NW embedded in scotch adhesive, inset—zoomed area of XRD pattern, (b) XRD patterns of Sample 2, where: the red line is the profile of simulated XRD pattern for GaP WZ space group, the green line is a simulated profile of ZB XRD pattern and the brown line is experimental data after background subtraction, offset for clarifying.
Calculated crystal phase content in the investigated samples with the corresponding growth parameters.
| Sample | Lattice Parameter | Lattice Parameter | WZ Content, % | Tgrowth, °C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample 1 | 3.840 | 6.349 | ~8.1 ± 0.93 | 590 |
| Sample 2 | 3.839 | 6.344 | ~9.7 ± 1.5 | 610 |
| Sample 3 | 3.839 | 6.345 | ~6.4 ± 1.14 | 620 |