Literature DB >> 33918294

Saliva Is a Valid Alternative to Nasopharyngeal Swab in Chemiluminescence-Based Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen.

Alessandra Amendola1, Giuseppe Sberna1, Eleonora Lalle1, Francesca Colavita1, Concetta Castilletti1, Giulia Menchinelli2,3, Brunella Posteraro3,4, Maurizio Sanguinetti2,3, Giuseppe Ippolito5, Licia Bordi1, Maria Rosaria Capobianchi1.   

Abstract

Diagnostic methods based on SARS-CoV-2 antigens detection are a promising alternative to SARS-CoV-2 RNA amplification. We evaluated the automated chemiluminescence-based Lumipulse® G SARS-CoV-2 Ag assay on saliva samples, using Simplexa™ COVID-19 Direct assay as a reference test. Analytical performance was established on a pool of healthy donors' saliva samples spiked with the 2019-nCoV/Italy-INMI1 isolate, whereas clinical performance was assessed on fresh saliva specimens collected from hospitalized patients with suspect or confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. The limit of detection (LOD) was 0.65 Log TCID50/mL, corresponding to 18,197 copies/mL of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Antigen concentrations and SARS-CoV-2 RNA were highly correlated (r = 0.99; p < 0.0001). Substantial agreement (80.3%) and significant correlation (r = -0.675; p = 0.0006) were observed between Lumipulse® G assay results and Ct values on clinical samples, with 52.4% sensitivity and specificity 94.1%. Sensitivity exceeded 90.0% when calculated on samples with Ct < 25, and specificity was 100% when excluding samples from recovered patients with previous COVID-19 diagnosis. Overall, chemiluminescence-based antigen assay may be reliably applied to saliva samples to identify individuals with high viral loads, more likely to transmit the virus. However, the low positive predictive value in a context of low SARS-CoV-2 prevalence underscores the need for confirmatory testing in SARS-CoV-2 antigen-positive cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2; antigen detection; diagnosis; saliva samples

Year:  2021        PMID: 33918294     DOI: 10.3390/jcm10071471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of four commercial, automated antigen tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.

Authors:  Andreas Osterman; Maximilian Iglhaut; Andreas Lehner; Patricia Späth; Marcel Stern; Hanna Autenrieth; Maximilian Muenchhoff; Alexander Graf; Stefan Krebs; Helmut Blum; Armin Baiker; Natascha Grzimek-Koschewa; Ulrike Protzer; Lars Kaderali; Hanna-Mari Baldauf; Oliver T Keppler
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Effective screening strategy against SARS-CoV-2 on self-collected saliva samples in primary school setting: A pilot project.

Authors:  Licia Bordi; Gabriella Parisi; Giuseppe Sberna; Alessandra Amendola; Bruno Mariani; Guido Meoni; Daniela Orazi; Pierluigi Bartoletti; Lorella Lombardozzi; Alessandra Barca; Maria Rosaria Capobianchi; Fabrizio D'Alba; Francesco Vaia
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 6.072

Review 3.  Saliva as a diagnostic specimen for SARS-CoV-2 detection: A scoping review.

Authors:  Yifei Wang; Akshaya Upadhyay; Sangeeth Pillai; Parisa Khayambashi; Simon D Tran
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.068

4.  Analytical Performance of Quantitative DiaSorin Liaison SARS-COV-2 Antigen Test for the Asymptomatic Population.

Authors:  Gema Fernández-Rivas; Jaume Barallat; Victoria Gonzalez; Silvia Martinez; Antoni E Bordoy; Laura Jimenez; Cristina Casañ; Ignacio Blanco
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-01-07

5.  Performance evaluation of Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen immunoassay for diagnostic of COVID-19.

Authors:  María C Montalvo Villalba; Elena Sosa Glaria; Licel de Los A Rodriguez Lay; Odalys Valdés Ramirez; Dayana Vallina García; Amely Arencibia Garcia; Javier Martinez Alfonso; Dunia M Menes Llerena; Loida Torres Pérez; Sonia R Resik Aguirre; Maria G Guzman Tirado
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 20.693

6.  Evaluation and Modelling of the Performance of an Automated SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Assay According to Sample Type, Target Population and Epidemic Trends.

Authors:  Nicolas Yin; Cyril Debuysschere; Valery Daubie; Marc Hildebrand; Charlotte Martin; Sonja Curac; Fanny Ponthieux; Marie-Christine Payen; Olivier Vandenberg; Marie Hallin
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-09

7.  Saliva sample for detection of SARS-CoV-2: A possible alternative for mass testing.

Authors:  Olumuyiwa Babalola Salu; Iorhen Ephraim Akase; Roosevelt Amaobichukwu Anyanwu; Mercy Remilekun Orenolu; Maryam Abiodun Abdullah; Temie Giwa-Tubosun; Sodiq Abiodun Oloko; Ayomide Michael Oshinjo; Aisha Ajoke Abiola; Kolawole Solomon Oyedeji; Sunday Aremu Omilabu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 8.  Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests for COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Muhammad Fazli Khalid; Kasturi Selvam; Alfeq Jazree Nashru Jeffry; Mohamad Fazrul Salmi; Mohamad Ahmad Najib; Mohd Noor Norhayati; Ismail Aziah
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.