Literature DB >> 33918202

Interactions between Cognition and Hearing Aid Compression Release Time: Effects of Linguistic Context of Speech Test Materials on Speech-in-Noise Performance.

Jingjing Xu1, Robyn M Cox1.   

Abstract

Recent research has established a connection between hearing aid (HA) users' cognition and speech recognition performance with short and long compression release times (RT). Contradictive findings prevent researchers from using cognition to predict RT prescription. We hypothesized that the linguistic context of speech recognition test materials was one of the factors that accounted for the inconsistency. The present study was designed to examine the relationship between HA users' cognition and their aided speech recognition performance with short and long RTs using materials with various linguistic contexts. Thirty-four older HA users' cognitive abilities were quantified using a reading span test. They were fitted with behind-the-ear style HAs with adjustable RT settings. Three speech recognition tests were used: the word-in-noise (WIN) test, the American four alternative auditory feature (AFAAF) test, and the Bamford-Kowal-Bench speech-in-noise (BKB-SIN) test. The results showed that HA users with high cognitive abilities performed better on the AFAAF and the BKB-SIN than those with low cognitive abilities when using short RT. None of the speech recognition tests produced significantly different performance between the two RTs for either cognitive group. These findings did not support our hypothesis. The results suggest that cognition might not be important in prescribing RT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognition; hearing aids; linguistic context; release time; speech recognition

Year:  2021        PMID: 33918202     DOI: 10.3390/audiolres11020013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Res        ISSN: 2039-4330


  30 in total

1.  ICRA noises: artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. International Collegium for Rehabilitative Audiology.

Authors:  W A Dreschler; H Verschuure; C Ludvigsen; S Westermann
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  2001 May-Jun

2.  Cognition in the hearing impaired and deaf as a bridge between signal and dialogue: a framework and a model.

Authors:  Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Richard H Wilson; Rachel A McArdle; Sherri L Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 4.  Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Gurjit Singh
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-03

5.  Recognition of speech in noise with new hearing instrument compression release settings requires explicit cognitive storage and processing capacity.

Authors:  Catharina Foo; Mary Rudner; Jerker Rönnberg; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 6.  What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory?

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.453

7.  Visual evoked potentials: relation to adult speechreading and cognitive function.

Authors:  J Rönnberg; S Arlinger; B Lyxell; C Kinnefors
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1989-12

8.  The four alternative auditory feature test (FAAF)--linguistic and psychometric properties of the material with normative data in noise.

Authors:  J R Foster; M P Haggard
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1987-08

9.  An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. SAM-TR-66-55.

Authors:  T W Tillman; R Carhart
Journal:  Tech Rep SAM-TR       Date:  1966-06

10.  Recording and evaluation of an American dialect version of the Four Alternative Auditory Feature test.

Authors:  Jingjing Xu; Robyn M Cox
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.