Literature DB >> 18236648

Recognition of speech in noise with new hearing instrument compression release settings requires explicit cognitive storage and processing capacity.

Catharina Foo1, Mary Rudner, Jerker Rönnberg, Thomas Lunner.   

Abstract

Evidence suggests that cognitive capacity predicts the ability to benefit from specific compression release settings in non-linear digital hearing instruments. Previous studies have investigated the predictive value of various cognitive tests in relation to aided speech recognition in noise using compression release settings that have been experienced for a certain period. However, the predictive value of cognitive tests with new settings, to which the user has not had the opportunity to become accustomed, has not been studied. In the present study, we compare the predictive values of two cognitive tests, reading span and letter monitoring, in relation to aided speech recognition in noise for 32 habitual hearing instrument users using new compression release settings. We found that reading span was a strong predictor of speech recognition in noise with new compression release settings. This result generalizes previous findings for experienced test settings to new test settings, for both speech recognition in noise tests used in the present study, Hagerman sentences and HINT. Letter monitoring, on the other hand, was not found to be a strong predictor of speech recognition in noise with new compression release settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18236648     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.18.7.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  57 in total

1.  The role of the episodic buffer in working memory for language processing.

Authors:  Mary Rudner; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-10-05

2.  Development and efficacy of a frequent-word auditory training protocol for older adults with impaired hearing.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Matthew H Burk; Lauren E Strauser; Dana L Kinney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Aided speech-identification performance in single-talker competition by older adults with impaired hearing.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Maureen Coughlin
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-10

4.  Working memory training to improve speech perception in noise across languages.

Authors:  Erin M Ingvalson; Sumitrajit Dhar; Patrick C M Wong; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Integrating cognitive and peripheral factors in predicting hearing-aid processing effectiveness.

Authors:  James M Kates; Kathryn H Arehart; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Intelligibility and Clarity of Reverberant Speech: Effects of Wide Dynamic Range Compression Release Time and Working Memory.

Authors:  Paul N Reinhart; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Effects of Steady-State Noise on Verbal Working Memory in Young Adults.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Mary Alt; Gayle DeDe; Sarah Olson; James Shehorn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Restoration of sensory input may improve cognitive and neural function.

Authors:  Hanin Karawani; Kimberly Jenkins; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Speech Recognition in Noise by Children with and without Dyslexia: How is it Related to Reading?

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Letitia M Krieg; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2018-05-01

10.  Effect of initial-consonant intensity on the speed of lexical decisions.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Allen A Montgomery; Kimberlee A Crass
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.