| Literature DB >> 33917699 |
Alberto González-García1, Arrate Pinto-Carral1, Jesús Sanz Villorejo2, Pilar Marqués-Sánchez1.
Abstract
Healthcare systems are immersed in transformative processes, influenced by economic changes, together with social and health instability. The middle nurse manager plays a fundamental role, since he or she is responsible for translating the strategic vision, values and objectives of the organization. The objective of this study was to propose the model of competencies to be developed by the middle nurse manager in the Spanish healthcare system. Our methodology consisted in the application of the Delphi method in order to reach an agreement on the necessary competencies, and principal component analysis (PCA) was used to determine the construct validity, reducing the dimensionality of the set of data. Fifty-one competencies were identified for the definition of the model, highlighting decision-making, leadership and communication. The PCA pointed out the structural validity of the proposed model through the saturation of the main components (α Cronbach > 0.631). The results show the model of competencies which the middle nurse manager in the Spanish healthcare system must develop. Middle nurse managers may use these as criteria to plan their professional strategies in the context of management. This model of competencies can be applied to establishing selection processes or training programs for the role of middle nurse manager.Entities:
Keywords: Hospital efficiency; competency; health policy; healthcare affordability; healthcare services; logistic level; middle nurse manager; model of competencies; nurse manager
Year: 2021 PMID: 33917699 PMCID: PMC8067971 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18083898
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Management levels. Source: own elaboration.
Sociodemographic characteristics of the panel experts.
| Characteristics | Range/Category | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | <40 | 10 | 20 |
| 40–50 | 15 | 30 | |
| 51–60 | 18 | 36 | |
| >60 | 7 | 14 | |
| Sex | Female | 32 | 64 |
| Male | 18 | 36 | |
| Education | Master’s degree | 34 | 68 |
| Ph.D | 14 | 28 | |
| Expert group 1 | Minister of Health | 3 | 6.1 |
| Expert group 2 | Head of the Health Department | 5 | 10 |
| Expert group 3 | General Council of Nurses | 3 | 6 |
| Expert group 4 | Scientific Association | 4 | 8 |
| Expert group 5 | Trade Union | 3 | 6 |
| Expert group 6 | General Manager | 5 | 10 |
| Expert group 6 | Medical Director | 2 | 4 |
| Expert group 6 | Nurse Executive | 5 | 10 |
| Expert group 6 | Management Director | 1 | 2 |
| Expert group 7 | Middle Nurse manager | 2 | 4.1 |
| Expert group 8 | Nursing supervisor | 3 | 6.1 |
| Expert group 9 | Nurse | 3 | 6.1 |
| Expert group 9 | Doctor | 2 | 4.1 |
| Expert group 9 | Assistant Nursing Care Technician | 2 | 4.1 |
| Expert group 10 | Nursing Degree Students | 2 | 4.1 |
| Expert group 11 | Research/Teaching | 4 | 8.2 |
| Expert group 12 | Lawyer | 1 | 1 |
Source: own elaboration.
Model of competencies for a middle nurse manager.
Source: own elaboration. Legend of the table: EXP = expert. V. COMP = very competent. COMP = competent.
Figure 2Dimensions of the middle nurse manager executive competency model. Source: own elaboration.
Level of competency development and training.
| Univ. Ext. | Cont. Ed | Univ. Exp. | Univ. Spec. D | Master | Ph.D. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 100% | |||||
|
| 90% | 98% | ||||
|
| 90% | 90% | 96% | |||
|
| 96% | 100% | 96% | 96% | ||
|
| 96% | 96% |
Source: own elaboration. Note: Univ. Ext. = university extension diploma; Cont. Ed = continuing education; Univ. Exp. = university expert; Univ. Spec. D. = university specialization diploma; Master = master’s degree; Ph.D. = Ph.D. degree.
Factor structure of the proposed competency model.
| Management Dimension | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CP1 | CP2 | CP3 | CP4 | ||
| Result orientation | 0.789 | ||||
| Strategic management | 0.725 | ||||
| Innovation | 0.710 | ||||
| Legal aspects | 0.936 | ||||
| Analytical thinking | 0.554 | ||||
| Organizational management | 0.968 | ||||
| Decision-making | 0.980 | ||||
| Explained variance | 32.325% | 18.075% | 12.822% | 11.569% | |
| Eigenvalue | 2.263 | 1.265 | 0.898 | 0.810 | |
| α Cronbach | 0.631 | ||||
|
| |||||
| CP1 | CP2 | CP3 | CP4 | ||
| Listening | 0.905 | ||||
| Information systems and computers | 0.679 | ||||
| English medium level of writing | 0.874 | ||||
| Technology | 0.636 | ||||
| Feedback | 0.88 | ||||
| Communication skills | 0.589 | ||||
| Evaluation of information and its sources | 0.826 | ||||
| Explained variance | 31.326% | 17.341% | 16.065% | 13.076% | |
| Eigenvalue | 2.193 | 1.214 | 1.125 | 0.915 | |
| α Cronbach | 0.6 | ||||
|
| |||||
| CP1 | CP2 | CP3 | CP4 | ||
| Change management | 0.812 | ||||
| Influence | 0.802 | ||||
| Leadership | 0.703 | ||||
| Delegation | 0.696 | ||||
| Collaboration and team management skills | 0.85 | ||||
| Critical thinking | 0.786 | ||||
| Team-building strategies | 0.736 | ||||
| Career planning | 0.707 | ||||
| Ethical principles | 0.885 | ||||
| Power and empowerment | 0.765 | ||||
| Conflict management | 0.936 | ||||
| Explained variance | 46.309% | 12.796% | 10.286% | 8.17% | |
| Eigenvalue | 5.094 | 1.408 | 1.131 | 0.899 | |
| α Cronbach | 0.876 | ||||
|
| |||||
| CP1 | CP2 | ||||
| Quality and safety | 0.971 | ||||
| Quality and improvement processes | 0.948 | ||||
| Identification and responsibility with the organization | 0.917 | ||||
| Health policy | 0.838 | ||||
| Explained variance | 57.954% | 29.970% | |||
| Eigenvalue | 2.318 | 1.199 | |||
| α Cronbach | 0.749 | ||||
|
| |||||
| CP1 | |||||
| Nursing training planning | 0.918 | ||||
| Nurse research | 0.910 | ||||
| Nursing theories | 0.822 | ||||
| Clinical skills | 0.777 | ||||
| Explained variance | 73.733% | ||||
| Eigenvalue | 2.949 | ||||
| α Cronbach | 0.808 | ||||
|
| |||||
| CP1 | CP2 | ||||
| Awareness of personal strengths and weaknesses | 0.905 | ||||
| Strategic vision | 0.891 | ||||
| Personal and professional balance | 0.836 | ||||
| Compassion | 0.884 | ||||
| Emotional intelligence | 0.735 | ||||
| Explained variance | 54.76% | 21.705% | |||
| Eigenvalue | 2.738 | 1.085 | |||
| α Cronbach | 0.809 | ||||
Source: own elaboration.