Literature DB >> 33917104

Wearable Devices for Physical Activity and Healthcare Monitoring in Elderly People: A Critical Review.

Eduardo Teixeira1,2,3,4, Hélder Fonseca1,4, Florêncio Diniz-Sousa1,4, Lucas Veras1,4, Giorjines Boppre1,4, José Oliveira1,4, Diogo Pinto5, Alberto Jorge Alves5, Ana Barbosa4,6, Romeu Mendes4,6,7, Inês Marques-Aleixo1,2,4.   

Abstract

The availability of wearable devices (WDs) to collect biometric information and their use during activities of daily living is significantly increasing in the general population. These small electronic devices, which record fitness and health-related outcomes, have been broadly utilized in industries such as medicine, healthcare, and fitness. Since they are simple to use and progressively cheaper, they have also been used for numerous research purposes. However, despite their increasing popularity, most of these WDs do not accurately measure the proclaimed outcomes. In fact, research is equivocal about whether they are valid and reliable methods to specifically evaluate physical activity and health-related outcomes in older adults, since they are mostly designed and produced considering younger subjects' physical and mental characteristics. Additionally, their constant evolution through continuous upgrades and redesigned versions, suggests the need for constant up-to-date reviews and research. Accordingly, this article aims to scrutinize the state-of-the-art scientific evidence about the usefulness of WDs, specifically on older adults, to monitor physical activity and health-related outcomes. This critical review not only aims to inform older consumers but also aid researchers in study design when selecting physical activity and healthcare monitoring devices for elderly people.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone; cardiovascular; cognitive function; diabetes; exercise; sensors; sleep; steeps; technology

Year:  2021        PMID: 33917104     DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics6020038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geriatrics (Basel)        ISSN: 2308-3417


  123 in total

1.  Validity of Wrist-Worn photoplethysmography devices to measure heart rate: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yanan Zhang; R Glenn Weaver; Bridget Armstrong; Sarah Burkart; Shuxin Zhang; Michael W Beets
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 2.  Improving the clinical value and utility of CGM systems: issues and recommendations : A joint statement of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the American Diabetes Association Diabetes Technology Working Group.

Authors:  John R Petrie; Anne L Peters; Richard M Bergenstal; Reinhard W Holl; G Alexander Fleming; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 10.122

3.  Accelerometer-based prediction of skeletal mechanical loading during walking in normal weight to severely obese subjects.

Authors:  L Veras; F Diniz-Sousa; G Boppre; V Devezas; H Santos-Sousa; J Preto; J P Vilas-Boas; L Machado; J Oliveira; H Fonseca
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Estimating Accuracy at Exercise Intensities: A Comparative Study of Self-Monitoring Heart Rate and Physical Activity Wearable Devices.

Authors:  Erin E Dooley; Natalie M Golaszewski; John B Bartholomew
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 5.  Brain Monitoring Devices in Neuroscience Clinical Research: The Potential of Remote Monitoring Using Sensors, Wearables, and Mobile Devices.

Authors:  Bill Byrom; Marie McCarthy; Peter Schueler; Willie Muehlhausen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Accuracy of consumer-level and research-grade activity trackers in ambulatory settings in older adults.

Authors:  Salvatore Tedesco; Marco Sica; Andrea Ancillao; Suzanne Timmons; John Barton; Brendan O'Flynn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Validity Evaluation of the Fitbit Charge2 and the Garmin vivosmart HR+ in Free-Living Environments in an Older Adult Cohort.

Authors:  Salvatore Tedesco; Marco Sica; Andrea Ancillao; Suzanne Timmons; John Barton; Brendan O'Flynn
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.773

8.  Accuracy of Optical Heart Rate Sensing Technology in Wearable Fitness Trackers for Young and Older Adults: Validation and Comparison Study.

Authors:  Hsueh-Wen Chow; Chao-Ching Yang
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 9.  Heart-rate variability: a biomarker to study the influence of nutrition on physiological and psychological health?

Authors:  Hayley A Young; David Benton
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.293

10.  Habitual levels of higher, but not medium or low, impact physical activity are positively related to lower limb bone strength in older women: findings from a population-based study using accelerometers to classify impact magnitude.

Authors:  K Hannam; K C Deere; A Hartley; U A Al-Sari; E M Clark; W D Fraser; J H Tobias
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  6 in total

1.  Pilots for Healthy and Active Ageing (PHArA-ON) Project: Definition of New Technological Solutions for Older People in Italian Pilot Sites Based on Elicited User Needs.

Authors:  Grazia D'Onofrio; Laura Fiorini; Lara Toccafondi; Erika Rovini; Sergio Russo; Filomena Ciccone; Francesco Giuliani; Daniele Sancarlo; Filippo Cavallo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 2.  Remote Healthcare for Elderly People Using Wearables: A Review.

Authors:  José Oscar Olmedo-Aguirre; Josimar Reyes-Campos; Giner Alor-Hernández; Isaac Machorro-Cano; Lisbeth Rodríguez-Mazahua; José Luis Sánchez-Cervantes
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-27

3.  A Teenager Physical Fitness Evaluation Model Based on 1D-CNN with LSTM and Wearable Running PPG Recordings.

Authors:  Junqi Guo; Boxin Wan; Siyu Zheng; Aohua Song; Wenshan Huang
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28

4.  Accuracy and Precision of Wearable Devices for Real-Time Monitoring of Swimming Athletes.

Authors:  Gloria Cosoli; Luca Antognoli; Valentina Veroli; Lorenzo Scalise
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Wearables: An R Package With Accompanying Shiny Application for Signal Analysis of a Wearable Device Targeted at Clinicians and Researchers.

Authors:  Peter de Looff; Remko Duursma; Matthijs Noordzij; Sara Taylor; Natasha Jaques; Floortje Scheepers; Kees de Schepper; Saskia Koldijk
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.617

6.  Anti-Reflective Zeolite Coating for Implantable Bioelectronic Devices.

Authors:  Giuseppe Oliva; Maria Giovanna Bianco; Antonino S Fiorillo; Salvatore A Pullano
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.