| Literature DB >> 33917063 |
J Karina Zapata1, Victoria Catalán2,3,4, Amaia Rodríguez2,3,4, Beatriz Ramírez2,3,4, Camilo Silva1,3,4, Javier Escalada1,3,4, Javier Salvador1,3,4, Giuseppe Calamita5, M Cristina Azcona-Sanjulian4,6, Gema Frühbeck1,2,3,4, Javier Gómez-Ambrosi2,3,4.
Abstract
In children and adolescents, obesity does not seem to depend on a reduction of resting energy expenditure (REE). Moreover, in this young population, the interactions between either age and obesity or between age and gender, or the role of leptin on REE are not clearly understood. To compare the levels of REE in children and adolescents we studied 181 Caucasian individuals (62% girls) classified on the basis of age- and sex-specific body mass index (BMI) percentile as healthy weight (n = 50), with overweight (n = 34), or with obesity (n = 97) and in different age groups: 8-10 (n = 38), 11-13 (n = 50), and 14-17 years (n = 93). REE was measured by indirect calorimetry and body composition by air displacement plethysmography. Statistically significant differences in REE/fat-free mass (FFM) regarding obesity or gender were not observed. Absolute REE increases with age (p < 0.001), but REE/FFM decreases (p < 0.001) and there is an interaction between gender and age (p < 0.001) on absolute REE showing that the age-related increase is more marked in boys than in girls, in line with a higher FFM. Interestingly, the effect of obesity on absolute REE is not observed in the 8-10 year-old group, in which serum leptin concentrations correlate with the REE/FFM (r = 0.48; p = 0.011). In conclusion, REE/FFM is not affected by obesity or gender, while the effect of age on absolute REE is gender-dependent and leptin may influence the REE/FFM in 8-10 year-olds.Entities:
Keywords: adolescents; age; children; leptin; obesity; resting energy expenditure
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33917063 PMCID: PMC8067685 DOI: 10.3390/nu13041216
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Demographic, biochemical and metabolic characteristics of the children and adolescents classified according to ponderal status.
| Healthy Weight | Overweight | Obesity |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 50 | 34 | 97 | |
| Sex, M/F | 15/35 | 8/26 | 46/51 | 0.018 |
| Age, years | 14.5 ± 0.3 | 13.2 ± 0.5 * | 13.3 ± 0.3 * | 0.002 |
| Height, cm | 161 ± 2 | 156 ± 2 | 156 ± 2 | 0.120 |
| Weight, kg | 53.5 ± 1.5 | 60.1 ± 2.5 | 75.2 ± 2.4 *, | <0.001 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 20.5 ± 0.3 | 24.2 ± 0.4 * | 29.9 ± 0.5 *, | <0.001 |
| Body fat, % | 24.0 ± 1.3 | 33.3 ± 1.3 * | 40.4 ± 0.7 *, | <0.001 |
| FFM, kg | 40.4 ± 1.2 | 40.1 ± 2.1 | 44.2 ± 1.3 | 0.083 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 74 ± 1 | 80 ± 1 * | 92 ± 1 *, | <0.001 |
| SBP, mm Hg | 99 ± 2 | 105 ± 2 * | 110 ± 1 *, | <0.001 |
| DBP, mm Hg | 60 ± 1 | 62 ± 1 | 67 ± 1 *, | <0.001 |
| REE, kcal/d | 1439 ± 24 | 1523 ± 39 | 1756 ± 35 *, | <0.001 |
| REE/FFM, kcal/d/kg | 36.6 ± 0.8 | 39.6 ± 1.1 * | 41.2 ± 0.6 * | <0.001 |
| Glucose, mg/dL | 86 ± 1 | 87 ± 1 | 89 ± 1 | 0.104 |
| Insulin, μU/mL | 11.7 ± 2.1 | 10.2 ± 1.1 | 19.8 ± 1.9 *, | 0.006 |
| HOMA | 2.6 ± 0.5 | 2.2 ± 0.3 | 4.4 ± 0.4 *, | 0.004 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 65 ± 3 | 75 ± 6 | 89 ± 4 * | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 159 ± 4 | 160 ± 5 | 165 ± 3 | 0.502 |
| LDL-cholesterol, mg/dL | 89 ± 4 | 91 ± 4 | 96 ± 3 | 0.347 |
| HDL-cholesterol, mg/dL | 57 ± 2 | 54 ± 2 | 51 ± 1 * | 0.019 |
| CRP, mg/L | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 3.9 ± 1.1 *, | <0.001 |
| TSH, µU/mL | 2.16 ± 0.20 | 2.55 ± 0.31 | 2.62 ± 0.15 | 0.273 |
| Leptin, ng/mL | 10.0 ± 1.2 | 26.0 ± 2.9 * | 35.2 ± 2.8 * | <0.001 |
Data presented as mean ± SEM. BMI, body mass index; FFM, fat-free mass; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; REE, resting energy expenditure; HOMA, homeostatic model of assessment; CRP, C-reactive protein; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone. Differences between groups were analyzed by ANOVA followed by LSD tests. * p < 0.05 vs normal BMI. † p < 0.05 vs. Overweight. Differences in gender distribution were analyzed by χ2 analysis. CRP concentrations were logarithmically transformed for statistical analysis.
Figure 1Comparison of absolute REE (A) and normalized by FFM (B) in children and adolescents with healthy weight, overweight or obesity. Values are means ± SEM. Statistical differences between groups were analyzed by ANOVA followed by LSD tests. * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001 between groups. REE, resting energy expenditure; FFM, fat-free mass.
Figure 2Comparison of absolute REE (A,C) and normalized by FFM (B,D) between male and female children and adolescents (A,B) or between different age groups (8–10, 11–13 and 14–17 years) (C,D). Values are means ± SEM. Statistical differences between groups were analyzed by ANOVA followed by LSD tests. ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 between groups. REE, resting energy expenditure; FFM, fat-free mass.
Simple correlation analysis between REE and REE/FFM with other variables.
| All ( | 8–10 y ( | 11–13 y ( | 14–17 y ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REE | REE/FFM | REE | REE/FFM | REE | REE/FFM | REE | REE/FFM | |
| Age |
|
|
|
| 0.19 |
| 0.11 | −0.07 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.194 |
| 0.285 | 0.507 | |
| Height |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Weight |
|
|
|
|
| −0.26 |
| 0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.064 |
| 0.145 | |
| BMI |
| −0.10 |
| −0.08 |
| −0.06 |
|
|
|
| 0.187 |
| 0.652 |
| 0.676 |
|
| |
| Body fat% |
|
| 0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.075 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| FFM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| WC |
|
|
|
|
| 0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.942 |
|
| |
| SBP |
| 0.05 | 0.32 | −0.13 |
| 0.03 |
|
|
|
| 0.515 | 0.059 | 0.462 |
| 0.859 |
|
| |
| DBP |
| 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.05 |
| 0.14 |
|
|
|
| 0.944 | 0.542 | 0.771 |
| 0.350 |
|
| |
| Glucose |
| 0.06 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.11 | −0.08 |
| 0.20 |
|
| 0.470 | 0.221 | 0.426 | 0.467 | 0.584 |
| 0.085 | |
| Insulin |
|
|
| −0.01 |
| −0.16 | 0.21 | −0.04 |
|
|
|
| 0.972 |
| 0.282 | 0.102 | 0.742 | |
| HOMA |
|
|
| 0.01 |
| −0.17 | 0.23 | −0.04 |
|
|
|
| 0.986 |
| 0.277 | 0.079 | 0.759 | |
| Triglycerides |
| 0.07 | 0.19 | −0.30 | 0.23 | 0.17 |
| 0.18 |
|
| 0.396 | 0.312 | 0.103 | 0.135 | 0.291 |
| 0.125 | |
| T. cholest. | −0.04 |
| 0.15 | −0.18 | −0.26 |
| 0.08 | 0.13 |
| 0.613 |
| 0.436 | 0.330 | 0.093 |
| 0.485 | 0.249 | |
| LDL-cholest. | 0.01 |
| 0.13 | −0.11 | −0.23 |
| 0.17 | 0.13 |
| 0.882 |
| 0.481 | 0.552 | 0.144 |
| 0.153 | 0.277 | |
| HDL-cholest. |
| 0.02 | 0.01 | −0.03 |
| 0.12 |
| −0.08 |
|
| 0.859 | 0.972 | 0.895 |
| 0.441 |
| 0.502 | |
| CRP |
|
| 0.29 | 0.18 | 0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.266 | 0.485 | 0.145 |
|
|
| |
| TSH | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.32 | −0.27 | 0.17 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.15 |
| 0.628 | 0.265 | 0.124 | 0.197 | 0.316 | 0.855 | 0.792 | 0.210 | |
| Leptin |
| −0.06 | 0.02 |
| 0.29 | −0.01 | 0.20 | 0.15 |
|
| 0.559 | 0.923 |
| 0.063 | 0.972 | 0.193 | 0.321 | |
Values are Pearson’s correlation coefficients and associated p values. CRP concentrations were logarithmically transformed for statistical analysis. BMI, body mass index; FFM, fat-free mass; WC, waist circumference; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HOMA, homeostatic model assessment; LDL, low-density lipoproteins; HDL, high-density lipoproteins; CRP, C-reactive protein; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone. Bold denotes statistically significant correlation.
Figure 3Comparison of absolute REE (A) and normalized by FFM (B) in the whole sample of children and adolescents (n = 181) segregated by gender and age groups (8–10, 11–13 and 14–17 years). Values are means ± SEM. Differences between groups were analyzed by two-way ANOVA (age x gender). Differences between age groups within each gender were analyzed by ANOVA followed by LSD tests. ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 between groups. REE, resting energy expenditure; FFM, fat-free mass.
Figure 4Comparison of absolute REE (A) and normalized by FFM (B) in the whole sample of children and adolescents (n = 181) segregated by age and weight groups (healthy weight, overweight and obesity). Values are means ± SEM. Differences between groups were analyzed by two-way ANOVA (age x obesity). Differences between groups of healthy weight, overweight and obesity within each age group were analyzed by ANOVA followed by LSD tests. ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 between groups. REE, resting energy expenditure; FFM, fat-free mass. HW, healthy weight; OW, overweight; OB, obesity.
Figure 5(A) Comparison of serum leptin concentrations in the subsample of children and adolescents (n = 113) segregated by gender and age groups (8–10, 11–13, and 14–17 years). Values are means ± SEM. Differences between groups were analyzed by two-way ANOVA (age × gender). (B) Scatter diagrams showing the correlations of serum leptin levels with REE (left) and REE/FFM (right) segregated by age groups (8–10, 11–13 and 14–17 years). Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) and p values are indicated.