| Literature DB >> 33916423 |
Kok Tong Wong1, Hasnah Osman1, Thaigarajan Parumasivam2, Unang Supratman3, Mohammad Tasyriq Che Omar4, Mohamad Nurul Azmi1.
Abstract
A total of fourteen pyrazoline derivatives were synthesized through cyclo-condensation reactions by chalcone derivatives with different types of semicarbazide. These compounds were characterized by IR, 1D-NMR (1H, 13C and Distortionless Enhancement by Polarization Transfer - DEPT-135) and 2D-NMR (COSY, HSQC and HMBC) as well as mass spectroscopy analysis (HRMS). The synthesized compounds were tested for their antituberculosis activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra in vitro. Based on this activity, compound 4a showed the most potent inhibitory activity, with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of 17 μM. In addition, six other synthesized compounds, 5a and 5c-5g, exhibited moderate activity, with MIC ranges between 60 μM to 140 μM. Compound 4a showed good bactericidal activity with a minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) value of 34 μM against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra. Molecular docking studies for compound 4a on alpha-sterol demethylase was done to understand and explore ligand-receptor interactions, and to hypothesize potential refinements for the compound.Entities:
Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; alpha-sterol demethylase; antitubercular agents; molecular docking; pyrazolines
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33916423 PMCID: PMC8038544 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26072081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The general structure of the pyrazoline at position 1-, 3- and 5-.
Scheme 1Synthesis of chalcone and pyrazoline derivatives.
Figure 2Key COSY/HMBC correlations of compound 4a.
Figure 3Key COSY/HMBC correlations of compound 5e.
In vitro anti-tuberculosis activities of pyrazoline derivatives (4a–g and 5a–g) against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra.
| Compounds | MIC | MBC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (μg/mL) | (μM) | (μg/mL) | (μM) | |
|
| 6.25 | 17 | 12.5 | 34 |
|
| >200 | >517 | >200 | >517 |
|
| 200 | 511 | >200 | >511 (NC) |
|
| >200 | >500 | >200 | >500 |
|
| 200 | 471 | >200 | >471 (NC) |
|
| 200 | 511 | >200 | >511 (NC) |
|
| >200 | >517 | >200 | >517 |
|
| 25 | 70 | 200 | 562 |
|
| >200 | >535 | >200 | >535 |
|
| 25 | 66 | 100 | 266 |
|
| 25 | 65 | 200 | 519 |
|
| 25 | 61 | 200 | 488 |
|
| 25 | 66 | 200 | 532 |
|
| 50 | 134 | 200 | 537 |
| Isoniazid (Control) | 0.625 | 5 | 0.625 | 5 |
Results are from three independent experiments performed in duplicate. NC = no bactericidal effect even at the highest test concentration.
Binding energy between cytochrome P450 14 alpha-sterol demethylase (CYP51) with compound 4a and controls (fluconazole and isoniazid) for all poses.
| Enzyme | Compound | Pose | Binding |
|---|---|---|---|
| CYP51 |
| 1 | −6.7 |
| 2 | −6.6 | ||
| 3 | −6.5 | ||
| 4 | −6.4 | ||
| 5 | −6.3 | ||
| 1 | −7.1 | ||
| 2 | −6.8 | ||
| Fluconazole | 3 | −6.6 | |
| 4 | −6.4 | ||
| 5 | −6.2 | ||
| Isoniazid | 1 | −6.0 | |
| 2 | −5.5 | ||
| 3 | −5.4 | ||
| 4 | −5.3 | ||
| 5 | −5.0 |
Figure 4Active sites of CYP51 for binding of compound 4a and controls (Fluconazole & Isonizid).
Figure 5Three-dimensional binding modes of compound 4a (pose 1–5) present at the active sites of CYP51. The interaction modes of the most potent pose in CYP51: Figure 5a orientation 4a in pose 1, Figure 5b orientation 4a in pose 2, Figure 5c orientation 4a in pose 3, Figure 5d orientation 4a in pose 4 and Figure 5e orientation 4a in pose 5. Pi-cation/Pi-anion/attractive charge interactions (orange), Pi-sigma interaction (purple), Pi-sulfur (light brown), conventional hydrogen bond interaction (green), unfavorable interaction (red), Pi-Pi T-shaped interaction (pink).
Binding interactions between compound 4a with CYP51 (poses 1 to 5).
| Enzyme | Active Site | Pose | Interacting Unit of Compounds | Protein Residue | Type of Interaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYP51 | 2 | 1 | Phenyl | Pi–Alkyl | |
| Phenyl | ILE27 | Pi–Pi T-shaped | |||
| Phenyl | TRP267 | Pi–Pi T-shaped | |||
| Phenyl | HIS318 | Pi–Cation | |||
| Thioamide | ARG354 | Unfavorable | |||
| Unfavorable | |||||
| 2 | 2 | Phenyl | TRP267 | Pi–Pi Stacked | |
| Phenyl | GLU271 | Pi–Anion | |||
| Pyrazoline ring | ARG274 | H-bond | |||
| Phenyl | Pi–Cation | ||||
| Thioamide | Unfavorable | ||||
| Unfavorable | |||||
| Thioamide | GLU424 | H-bond | |||
| Thioamide | TYR426 | H-bond | |||
| Phenyl | ARG427 | Pi–Alkyl | |||
| 2 | 3 | Phenyl | ILE27 | Pi–Alkyl | |
| Phenyl | ARG274 | Pi–Cation | |||
| Thioamide | LEU317 | H-bond | |||
| Thioamide | HIS318 | Pi–Sulfur | |||
| Pyrazoline ring | ARG354 | H-bond | |||
| Thioamide | Unfavorable | ||||
| Phenyl | ARG427 | Pi–Alkyl | |||
| Thioamide | HIS430 | Pi–Sulfur | |||
| 3 | 4 | Phenyl | THR80 | Pi–Sigma | |
| Thioamide | GLY84 | H-bond | |||
| Thioamide | GLU94 | Attractive charge | |||
| Phenyl | ARG96 | Pi–Cation | |||
| 3 | 5 | Phenyl | THR80 | Pi–Sigma | |
| Thioamide | GLU94 | Attractive charge | |||
| Phenyl | ARG96 | Pi–Cation |