Literature DB >> 33910971

Implementing Improvements: Opportunities to Integrate Quality Improvement and Implementation Science.

Amy Tyler1,2,3, Russell E Glasgow2,4.   

Abstract

In hospitals, improvers and implementers use quality improvement science (QIS) and less frequently implementation research (IR) to improve health care and health outcomes. Narrowly defined quality improvement (QI) guided by QIS focuses on transforming systems of care to improve health care quality and delivery and IR focuses on developing approaches to close the gap between what is known (research findings) and what is practiced (by clinicians). However, QI regularly involves implementing evidence and IR consistently addresses organizational and setting-level factors. The disciplines share a common end goal, namely, to improve health outcomes, and work to understand and change the same actors in the same settings often encountering and addressing the same challenges. QIS has its origins in industry and IR in behavioral science and health services research. Despite overlap in purpose, the 2 sciences have evolved separately. Thought leaders in QIS and IR have argued the need for improved collaboration between the disciplines. The Veterans Health Administration's Quality Enhancement Research Initiative has successfully employed QIS methods to implement evidence-based practices more rapidly into clinical practice, but similar formal collaborations between QIS and IR are not widespread in other health care systems. Acute care teams are well positioned to improve care delivery and implement the latest evidence. We provide an overview of QIS and IR; examine the key characteristics of QIS and IR, including strengths and limitations of each discipline; and present specific recommendations for integration and collaboration between the 2 approaches to improve the impact of QI and implementation efforts in the hospital setting.
Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33910971      PMCID: PMC8074111          DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-002246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hosp Pediatr        ISSN: 2154-1671


  41 in total

1.  Evidence-based quality improvement: the state of the science.

Authors:  Kaveh G Shojania; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Seven propositions of the science of improvement: exploring foundations.

Authors:  Rocco J Perla; Lloyd P Provost; Gareth J Parry
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.926

3.  Analytical studies: a framework for quality improvement design and analysis.

Authors:  Lloyd P Provost
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 4.  The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research.

Authors:  Shannon Wiltsey Stirman; John Kimberly; Natasha Cook; Amber Calloway; Frank Castro; Martin Charns
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist.

Authors:  Mark S Bauer; Laura Damschroder; Hildi Hagedorn; Jeffrey Smith; Amy M Kilbourne
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2015-09-16

6.  Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks.

Authors:  Per Nilsen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Learning Evaluation: blending quality improvement and implementation research methods to study healthcare innovations.

Authors:  Bijal A Balasubramanian; Deborah J Cohen; Melinda M Davis; Rose Gunn; L Miriam Dickinson; William L Miller; Benjamin F Crabtree; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Architectural frameworks: defining the structures for implementing learning health systems.

Authors:  Lysanne Lessard; Wojtek Michalowski; Michael Fung-Kee-Fung; Lori Jones; Agnes Grudniewicz
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  An Extension of RE-AIM to Enhance Sustainability: Addressing Dynamic Context and Promoting Health Equity Over Time.

Authors:  Rachel C Shelton; David A Chambers; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-05-12

10.  Expanding Hybrid Studies for Implementation Research: Intervention, Implementation Strategy, and Context.

Authors:  Christopher G Kemp; Bradley H Wagenaar; Emily E Haroz
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2019-11-08
View more
  4 in total

1.  How Dissemination and Implementation Science Can Contribute to the Advancement of Learning Health Systems.

Authors:  Katy E Trinkley; P Michael Ho; Russell E Glasgow; Amy G Huebschmann
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 7.840

2.  An Implementation Science Laboratory as One Approach to Whole System Improvement: A Canadian Healthcare Perspective.

Authors:  Rachel Flynn; Stephanie P Brooks; Denise Thomson; Gabrielle L Zimmermann; David Johnson; Tracy Wasylak
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  A network analysis of dissemination and implementation research expertise across a university: Central actors and expertise clusters.

Authors:  Reza Yousefi Nooraie; Gretchen Roman; Kevin Fiscella; James M McMahon; Elissa Orlando; Nancy M Bennett
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2022-03-07

4.  The pragmatic, rapid, and iterative dissemination and implementation (PRIDI) cycle: adapting to the dynamic nature of public health emergencies (and beyond).

Authors:  Reza Yousefi Nooraie; Rachel C Shelton; Kevin Fiscella; Bethany M Kwan; James M McMahon
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2021-08-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.