Literature DB >> 23807130

Seven propositions of the science of improvement: exploring foundations.

Rocco J Perla1, Lloyd P Provost, Gareth J Parry.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The phrase "Science of Improvement" or "Improvement Science" is commonly used today by a range of people and professions to mean different things, creating confusion to those trying to learn about improvement. In this article, we briefly define the concepts of improvement and science, and review the history of the consideration of "improvement" as a science.
METHODS: We trace key concepts and ideas in improvement to their philosophical and theoretical foundation with a focus on Deming's System of Profound Knowledge. We suggest that Deming's system has a firm association with many contemporary and historic philosophic and scientific debates and concepts. With reference to these debates and concepts, we identify 7 propositions that provide the scientific and philosophical foundation for the science of improvement.
FINDINGS: A standard view of the science of improvement does not presently exist that is grounded in the philosophical and theoretical basis of the field. The 7 propositions outlined here demonstrate the value of examining the underpinnings of improvement. This is needed to both advance the field and minimize confusion about what the phrase "science of improvement" represents. We argue that advanced scientists of improvement are those who like Deming and Shewhart can integrate ideas, concepts, and models between scientific disciplines for the purpose of developing more robust improvement models, tools, and techniques with a focus on application and problem solving in real world contexts.
CONCLUSIONS: The epistemological foundations and theoretical basis of the science of improvement and its reasoning methods need to be critically examined to ensure its continued development and relevance. If improvement efforts and projects in health care are to be characterized under the canon of science, then health care professionals engaged in quality improvement work would benefit from a standard set of core principles, a standard lexicon, and an understanding of the evolution of the science of improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23807130     DOI: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e31829a6a15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care        ISSN: 1063-8628            Impact factor:   0.926


  24 in total

1.  Enhancing Dissemination, Implementation, and Improvement Science in CTSAs through Regional Partnerships.

Authors:  Moira Inkelas; Arleen F Brown; Stefanie D Vassar; Ibrahima C Sankaré; Arturo B Martinez; Katrina Kubicek; Tony Kuo; Anish Mahajan; Michael Gould; Brian S Mittman
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.689

2.  Know It When You See It: Identifying and Using Special Cause Variation for Quality Improvement.

Authors:  Alison R Carroll; David P Johnson
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2020-10-13

3.  Continuous quality improvement at the frontline: One interdisciplinary clinical team's four-year journey after completing a virtual learning program.

Authors:  Claire H Robinson; Amy J Thompto; Elizabeth N Lima; Laura J Damschroder
Journal:  Learn Health Syst       Date:  2022-09-27

4.  Dissemination, Implementation, and Improvement Science Research in Population Health: Opportunities for Public Health and CTSAs.

Authors:  Tony Kuo; Lauren N Gase; Moira Inkelas
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 4.689

5.  Engaging the Community in the Dissemination, Implementation, and Improvement of Health-Related Research.

Authors:  Stefanie C Bodison; Ibrahima Sankaré; Henry Anaya; Juanita Booker-Vaughns; Aria Miller; Pluscedia Williams; Keith Norris
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 4.689

6.  Faculty Development in Improvement Science: Building Capacity and Expanding Curricula Across an Academic Health Center.

Authors:  Moira K Ray; Sherril B Gelmon; Matthew DiVeronica; Kimberly Lepin
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-12

7.  Implementing Improvements: Opportunities to Integrate Quality Improvement and Implementation Science.

Authors:  Amy Tyler; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2021-05

Review 8.  How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types.

Authors:  Margareth Crisóstomo Portela; Peter J Pronovost; Thomas Woodcock; Pam Carter; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 9.  How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types.

Authors:  Margareth Crisóstomo Portela; Peter J Pronovost; Thomas Woodcock; Pam Carter; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  Institutional quality and patient safety programs: An overview for the healthcare epidemiologist.

Authors:  Pranavi V Sreeramoju; Tara N Palmore; Grace M Lee; Michael B Edmond; Jan E Patterson; Kent A Sepkowitz; Donald A Goldmann; David K Henderson; Keith S Kaye
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.