| Literature DB >> 33907477 |
Thu Le Hoang Di1, Thanh Hoang Ngoc1, Dac Hong An Ngo1, Nghi Thanh Nhan Le2, Binh Le Trong1, Khoan Le Trong1, Thao Nguyen Thanh1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION ANDEntities:
Keywords: Insall–Salvati ratio; MRI; Vietnamese; anterior knee pain; patellofemoral joint
Year: 2021 PMID: 33907477 PMCID: PMC8064714 DOI: 10.2147/ORR.S306316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop Res Rev ISSN: 1179-1462
Figure 1Measurement of patellar height and the length of the patellar ligament. The patellar length (white double arrow) was measured from the superior articular margin to the distal anterior tip of the patella. The patellar ligament length (white dashed double arrow) was measured along the posterior margin of the ligament from the patellar attachment to the tibial insertion.
Figure 2The distribution of the Insall-Salvati ratio for the whole sample. The thick solid line shows the mean (1.02), and the broken lines show the normal range within the 2 SD range (0.72, 1.32).
Insall-Salvati Ratio According to Age and Sex
| Total Patients | Female | Male | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| Age | 40.19 ± 14.63 | 46.58 ± 14.62 | 34.82 ± 12.3 | < 0.05 |
| LL (cm) | 4.06 ± 0.52 | 3.88 ± 0.47 | 4.21 ± 0.52 | < 0.05 |
| PL (cm) | 4 ± 0.36 | 3.76 ± 0.28 | 4.19 ± 0.3 | < 0.05 |
| LL/PL ratio | 1.02 ± 0.15 | 1.03 ± 0.15 | 1.01 ± 0.15 | 0.064 |
Abbreviations: LL, ligament length; PL, patellar length; SD, standard deviation.
Mean Insall-Salvati Ratio and Standard Deviation of Different Studies
| Study | Mean Insall-Salvati Ratio ± SD |
|---|---|
| Our study | 1.02 ± 0.15 |
| Hong et al | 0.92 ± 0.14 |
| Insall and Salvati | 1.02 ± 0.13 |
| Althani et al | 1.20 ± 0.17 |
| Schlenzka and Schwesinger | 1.00 ± 0.14 |
| Ahmed et al | 1.02 ± 0.13 |
| Miller et al | 1.1 ± 0.1 |
| Upadhyay et al | 1.14 ± 0.18 |
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.
The Prevalence of Patella Alta and Patella Baja in Different Populations
| Study | Patella Alta | Patella Baja |
|---|---|---|
| Our study | 0.9% | 2.4% |
| Hong et al | 1.9% | 2.11% |
| Upadhyay et al | 2.8% | 1.0% |