Changes in inflammatory gene expression in brain tissue adjacent and distant to a viable cyst in a rat model for neurocysticercosis.

BACKGROUND: The parasite Taenia solium causes neurocysticercosis (NCC) in humans and is a common cause of adult-onset epilepsy in the developing world. Hippocampal atrophy, which occurs far from the cyst, is an emerging new complication of NCC. Evaluation of molecular pathways in brain regions close to and distant from the cyst could offer insight into this pathology.
METHODS: Rats were inoculated intracranially with T. solium oncospheres. After 4 months, RNA was extracted from brain tissue samples in rats with NCC and uninfected controls, and cDNA was generated. Expression of 38 genes related to different molecular pathways involved in the inflammatory response and healing was assessed by RT-PCR array.
RESULTS: Inflammatory cytokines IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-1, together with TGF-β and ARG-1, were overexpressed in tissue close to the parasite compared to non-infected tissue. Genes for IL-1A, CSF-1, FN-1, COL-3A1, and MMP-2 were overexpressed in contralateral tissue compared to non-infected tissue.
CONCLUSIONS: The viable cysticerci in the rat model for NCC is characterized by increased expression of genes associated with a proinflammatory response and fibrosis-related proteins, which may mediate the chronic state of infection. These pathways appear to influence regions far from the cyst, which may explain the emerging association between NCC and hippocampal atrophy.

Introduction

Neurocysticercosis (NCC) is caused by Taenia solium, a parasite endemic to Latin America, Africa, and regions of Asia [1,2]. Although NCC is both preventable and eradicable, worldwide, it is estimated that as many as 3 million people currently suffer from seizures caused by this disease [3]. It is thought to be responsible for up to one third of all epilepsy cases in these regions, and is the most common risk factor for adulthood-onset epilepsy [4].

The life cycle of T. solium begins when humans ingest parasitic cysts that are present in undercooked, infected pork. The cysts mature into adult tapeworms after attaching themselves to the mucosa of the upper small intestine, where they begin to grow and develop proglottids, each of which may contain up to 50,000 ova that are continuously expelled in the host excrement [1,5]. Although the natural intermediate hosts of T. solium are pigs, humans may inadvertently take their place by ingesting ova. Once inside the intestinal tract, the ova transform into oncospheres and upon passing through the intestinal wall are carried throughout the bloodstream to different parts of the body, including the central nervous system, where in just a few months they form viable cysts capable of surviving for many years [1,5]. In the brain, cysts are most commonly found in the parenchyma, the region receiving the largest blood supply [1].

In NCC patients, viable cysts do not appear to be associated with inflammation, and thus ostensibly do not cause clinical manifestations in their host [6]. Over time, and for reasons yet to be determined, the immune system eventually recognizes the cysts, producing the cysts degeneration accompanied by an associated inflammation[6]. Different imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computerized tomography (CT) permit researchers to evaluate the degree of inflammation and cyst degeneration, but these methods give no clue as to the actual underlying biochemical mechanisms that occur as the disease progresses [7-9]. Therefore, the study of viable cysts and the various molecular pathways stimulated in their presence can provide pivotal information about NCC pathophysiology and its symptoms.

Our group has shown in the rat model that changes such as blood-brain-barrier disruption, angiogenic factor overexpression, and axonal swellings occur in the presence of viable cysts [10,11]. Most of these changes have been found and reported in the tissue surrounding the cyst. However, hippocampal atrophy occurring far from the cyst is emerging as new complication in NCC patients. [12-14]. We set out to evaluate the different molecular pathways in brain regions distant from the cyst in order to better understand the pathogenesis of this outcome.

The following work examined gene expression by a real time PCR array of 38 genes related to different molecular pathways involving cytokine production, fibrosis, angiogenesis, oxidative stress metabolism and apoptosis in the tissue surrounding viable cysts and its contralateral region in a rat model for NCC. Uninfected rats were used as a control for basal gene expression. Tissue samples contralateral to the cysts were examined in order to test the hypothesis that cysticerci can exert influence in gene expression even in regions far from the parasite.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Animal procedures were conducted according to Universidad Peruana Heredia ethics procedures (IATA number 64637). The protocol was approved by the IACUC of the Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia in Lima, Peru.

Animal infection

Nineteen animals from 12 to 15 days old were obtained from the UPCH animal care facility and were inoculated with 120 T. solium activated onchospheres following a previously reported protocol (9). Briefly, enveloped T. solium eggs were treated with sodium hypochlorite 0.75% solution, and then activated with porcine bilis and pancreatine solution. Oncospheres were injected intracraneally in the bregma region following administration of anesthesia (ketamine 150 mg/kg and xylazine 20 mg/kg).

Tissue collection

Four months after infection, rats were euthanized using ketamine and xylazine, perfused with PBS and the brain was removed inside a laminar flow cabinet. For non-infected rats (n = 6), all brains neocortices were dissected and small parts of frontal cortex (anterior) and occipital temporal cortex (posterior) were collected in order to have a random sample of control tissue (12 non-infected tissues). For infected rats (n = 13), the tissue surrounding the cyst was dissected and collected and other samples were taken from the contralateral side of the brain, distant from any cyst (n = 13, Fig 1). Only brains carrying 1–2 parenchymal cysts were used. Characteristics of tissue samples taken from each rat are shown in S1 Table. Collected tissues were immersed in RNAlater at 4°C overnight, and the following day RNAlater was removed and samples were stored at -70°C, according to manufacturer’s instructions (Ambion).

Fig 1

Tissue collected in this study.

Non-infected tissue (N, n = 12), tissue close to the parasite (CP, n = 13) and, its contralateral tissue (Ct, n = 13).

RNA extraction and qRT-PCR array

RNA was extracted using a column-based method (RNeasy Microarray Tissue, Qiagen). Briefly, 100mg of tissue was homogenized in 1ml QIAzol lisys reagent, chloroform was added, centrifuged and the aqueous phase was collected and placed in a new tube containing 70% ethanol. The solution was transferred to a spin column, centrifuged and washed two times in kit buffers. RNase-free water was added, and RNA concentration (260nm) and quality (ratio 260/280nm) were measured using NanoDrop. Next, cDNA was generated from 5ug of RNA for each sample using RT2 First Strand Kit (Qiagen), which contained a genomic DNA elimination step. All cDNA and RNA obtained were tested using RT2-RNA-QC-PCR-Array kit (Qiagen, Cat# PARN-999ZC-1), which contained 8 controls used to assess the quality of each sample. Later, cDNA first strand samples that passed quality control evaluation were mixed with 2 × RT2 SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix and RNase-free water. The StepOneplus instrument was used for real time PCR under the following cycling conditions; 10 min at 95°C, 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 sec and finally 1min at 60°C. In total, 38 genes were evaluated for each of the 38 samples, and 5 additional housekeeping genes. Twenty plates of 96 wells were run and the threshold used for Ct calculations was set as 10 times the standard deviation of the baseline (first 10 cycles). NormFinder was used for Housekeeping gene selection and finally, Expression levels for all markers were normalized using beta actin gene, which proved to be the most stable housekeeping gene compared to B2M, HPRT1, LDHA, and RPLP1. Finally, 2−ΔΔCT method was chosen for relative gene expression [15].

Statistics

Comparison between non-infected tissue, tissue close to the parasite, and its contralateral side was performed using Kruskall Wallis, and Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment was used for pairwise comparison. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test was used for comparison between the anterior and posterior areas from non-infected animals and for comparison between the tissue close to the parasite and its contralateral side. QCanvas v1.21 was used for heat map graphing, relative fold of change was converted to a logarithmic scale, and for clustering, average method and spearman rank correlation was chosen.

Results

Inflammatory cytokines are overexpressed in NCC model

Notably, inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ, TNF-α, colony stimulator factors (CSF-1 and CSF-2), IL-1β, IL-1α, as well as IL-6, which is considered an immunomodulatory cytokine, were overexpressed in the tissue close to the parasite compared to the non-infected tissue (P = 0.037, <0.001, <0.001, 0.006, <0.001, <0.001 and <0.001, respectively). As expected, these cytokine expression levels were significantly increased in the infected tissue surrounding the cyst when compared to its contralateral side (P = 0.019, 0.003, 0.014, 0.010, 0.018 and 0.004 respectively), except for CSF-2, (P = 0.076). However, for anti-inflammatory cytokines like IL-4 and IL-10; no significant differences in expression were found in the tissue surrounding the parasite compared to its contralateral side and the non-infected tissue (Fig 2).

Fig 2

Inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress related molecules in NCC.

Pro-inflammatory cytokines were overexpressed in the tissue close to the parasite (CP), effects on contralateral region (Ct) were evaluated and compared against non-infected tissue (N). n = 13 infected tissues for CP and Ct, n = 12 non-infected tissues. *, P<0.05; ** P<0.01; *** P<0.001).

Among the nitric oxide synthases evaluated; neuronal (nNOS), inducible (iNOS) and endothelial (eNOS), only iNOS was overexpressed in the tissue close to the cyst compared to the non-infected tissue (P<0.001). Furthermore, its competitor enzyme, arginase-1 (ARG-1), was also overexpressed close to the cyst (P = 0.001). No changes were found in other oxidative stress related molecules such as superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD-1) and hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α). Additionally, caspase 7 (CASP-7) gene expression, a protease involved in inflammation and apoptosis, was elevated in the tissue close to the cyst (P = 0.003, Fig 2).

Fibrosis and angiogenic related genes response

Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1), a fibrosis and immunomodulation related gene and its receptor (TGF-βR1) were overexpressed in the tissue close to the parasite compared with non-infected animals (P<0.001, P<0.001 respectively) and with its contralateral side (P = 0.009, 0.018). TGF-β3 was also overexpressed in the tissue close to the parasite compared to its contralateral side (P = 0.012) but no changes compared to the non-infected tissue were found. Additionally, no changes for TGF-β2 were found. As expected, extracellular matrix related genes including fibronectin 1 (FN-1), collagen 1a1 (COL-1A1) and collagen 3a1 (COL-3A1) were increased in comparison to the non-infected tissue (P<0.001, <0.001, <0.001, respectively) and its contralateral side (P = 0.011, 0.006, 0.022, respectively). Evaluation of proteins related to extracellular matrix remodeling showed that matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2), but not MMP-9, was overexpressed in the tissue close the cyst compared to the non-infected tissue (P<0.001) and to its contralateral side (P = 0.014), (Fig 3).

Fig 3

TGF-β and fibrosis-related genes were overexpressed in NCC.

Tissue close to the parasite (CP) and contralateral region (Ct) were compared against non-infected tissue (N). n = 13 infected tissues for CP and Ct, n = 12 non-infected tissues. *P<0.05; ** P<0.01; *** P<0.001).

Angiogenic gene expression showed down regulation of VEGF-A in the tissue close to the parasite compared to the non-infected tissue (P = 0.009); but no changes were found in its receptors (VEGFR-1 and 2), and in the other VEGF genes (VEGF-B and VEGF-C). In addition, angiopoietin-1 (ANGPT-1) and its receptor as well as fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2) showed no changes in their expression. However, expression of the angiopoietin-2 gene (ANGPT-2) was increased in the tissue close to the parasite compared to the non-infected tissue and its contralateral side (P = 0.003 and 0,046, respectively).

Changes in gene expression in the contralateral side of the infected brain

Most of the 38 genes evaluated in the tissue contralateral to the cyst did not show a significant difference in expression compared to the non-infected tissue except for IL-1α, CSF-1, FN1, COL3A1, and MMP-2, which were overexpressed (P = 0.043, 0.038, 0.017, 0.045, 0.040, respectively), and neuropilin-1, which was down regulated (P = 0.019, respectively). To better illustrate the effects on the contralateral tissue, we show a heatmap where each infected tissue is next to its contralateral side (Fig 4) Interestingly, many contralateral tissues presented similar gene expression patterns as its infected tissue close to the parasite (Fig 4, top), and as expected, the rest of the samples showed a similar profile as the non-infected rats (Fig 4, middle). A heat map representing all evaluated genes is presented in S1 Fig.

Fig 4

NCC rat model shows a predominance of pro-inflammatory and fibrosis-related response with changes in gene expression tissue distant to the parasite.

Genes with significant changes in gene expression compared to non-infected tissue or to the contralateral side are displayed. Each tissue close to the parasite (CP) is represented next to its contralateral tissue (CT). The upper part of the heatmap shows tissue where the contralateral presents an inflammatory and fibrosis related response. The middle of the graph shows samples where the contralateral tissue seems to not be affected by the presence of the parasite. At the bottom not-infected tissue is shown (N). Three different regions of the brain were used: frontal cortex (anterior, A), parietal temporal cortex (medial, M) and occipital temporal (posterior, P). *, indicates rats with two parenchymal cysts. Bar represents log2 of fold change.

Discussion

Our study shows, first, that the tissue surrounding the T. solium cysticercus exhibits a proinflammatory and fibrosis-related gene profile; and second, that the tissue contralateral to the cyst also undergoes differential expression of the gene profile, suggesting that T. solium cysticercus can exert pathological changes not only in its vicinity but also in distant brain regions such as the contralateral hemisphere. It is possible that various host-parasite interactions cause pathological changes even without producing symptoms in the patient. Since previous studies have only focused on processes that occur in non-viable, degenerating cysts, we report here a descriptive study that evaluated the changes in different molecular pathways due to the presence of viable parenchymal cysts.

We observed that most of the pro-inflammatory-associated cytokines examined (IFN-γ, TNF-α, CSF-1, CSF-2, IL-1β, IL-1α) were increased in the area surrounding the viable cyst when compared to the non-infected tissue. It has long been thought that viable cysts, before they degenerate, exhibit little or no inflammation in the surrounding tissue [6,16,17], however, our results challenge this notion. Perhaps instead, these cytokine reactions are part of the immunoregulatory mechanisms that allow for a permissive environment in the asymptomatic host [18,19]. It is also plausible that the cyst itself secretes molecules that promote localized immunosuppression or host tolerance. At this stage of infection (i.e. the viable cyst stage) the TH1 response appears to represent a host inflammatory reaction that while quantifiable at the molecular level, remains subclinical and ineffective in destroying the parasite. Another explanation for this observation could be that the cyst is already starting to degenerate even though we saw no clinical evidence of this in the rat. Finally, a third explanation could be that while the rat is the best mammalian model we have at our disposal to study this complex disease process, it is an atypical host for T. solium, and the immune response triggered in the rat may be different than that of humans.

Interestingly, no differences were found in expression of the TH2 associated cytokine gene IL-4, even though a predominantly TH2 response is more often associated with asymptomatic NCC [20,21]. The TH2 response is important in protecting against extracellular helminthic parasites through suppression of the inflammatory TH1 response, neutralization of toxins, and defense of the host against damage [22,23]. To further understand the role of the TH2 cytokines in the pathogenesis of the viable cyst, future studies should evaluate all cytokines in this group, including IL-5 and IL-13.

TGF-β, along with IL-10 play important roles in the T regulatory (Treg) pathways of the inflammatory response. Here, we showed increased TGF-β1 and its receptor, TGF-βR1 gene expression in tissue surrounding the cysts compared to contralateral tissues and controls. No significant differences in IL-10 gene expression were observed between infected and control tissue. TGF-β genes are implicated in a variety of CNS pathologies, including epilepsy and neuroinflammation [24-26], but have also been shown to promote neuroprotection and brain maintenance [27]. Bar-Klein, et al. demonstrated the contributory role of albumin-mediated TGF-β1 signaling in epileptogenesis following vascular insult [24]. On the other hand, the potential neuroprotective effects of TGF-β, through regulation of apoptotic protein expression, have been demonstrated in the setting of cerebral ischemia [28]. However, other studies have shown that both parasite and host-secreted TGF-β play important roles in parasite infection. Proteins secreted by parasites in the host tissue can promote Treg induction through the TGF-β pathway. Human TGF-β has been shown to promote survival of T. solium cysticerci in vitro [29]. Additional investigation is necessary to fully elucidate the complex role of TGF-β in NCC pathogenesis.

Regarding NOS gene expression, our results support the idea that a pro-inflammatory pathway is governing the viable NCC cyst response, as iNOS was overexpressed. In neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease, iNOS stimulates overproduction of NO, yet neuroprotective mechanisms of NO through a number of molecular pathways have also been demonstrated [30]. In this study, ARG-1, a known enzyme competitor of iNOS, was also overexpressed. Madan reported that arginase I levels are elevated after a brain injury (TBI), and ARG-2 maintains its basal levels. Quierie, et al. reported similar findings in the setting of stroke [31,32]. Arginase gene expression in this study followed the same pattern. Furthermore, high levels of ARG-1 following brain insult indicate the presence of M2 type macrophages, known to play an important role in tissue remodeling and suppression of the inflammatory response [31,32]. Thus, arginase 1 may be participating in both the anti-inflammatory response and fibrogenesis pathways, which is perhaps the main role this protein plays here [30,31].

Brain tissue in the presence of NCC stimulates formation of a fibrosis layer, which acts as an interface between the parasite and host tissue. As expected, fibrosis-related genes such as COL-1A1, COL-3A1, and FN-1 were overexpressed surrounding the cyst. Among the VEGF genes, only VEGF-A showed a difference in expression between tissue surrounding the cyst and normal tissue. Surprisingly, gene expression of VEGF-A was slightly down regulated. This contrasts a previous report by our group which showed angiogenesis in NCC-infected brain slices as well as an increase in VEGF-A protein expression surrounding the cyst [10]. Even though we did not find significantly increased levels of gene expression associated with angiogenesis in this study, it is evident that in the tissue surrounding the cyst, angiogenesis is present and expected [10,17]. Furthermore, we did not observe a parallel relationship between VEGF-A RNA levels in this study and VEGF-A protein levels reported in our previous study. Thus, it is possible that changes in expression of VEGF-A involve regulatory changes in its RNA half-life or different ratios of protein translation related to the complex expression of VEGF-A gene and its isoforms [33,34].

We have seen a predominant inflammatory response presented as overexpression of IL-1β, IL-1α, IFN-γ, and CSF-1, 2. However, we also observed two important molecules involved in the regulation of the immune system. First TGF-β1, a cytokine presented in regulatory lymphocytes. Second ARG-1, which plays a role in M2 macrophage polarization and is a competitor enzyme of iNOS [35]. Both TGF-β and ARG-1, besides their important roles in regulating the immune response, are known to play a role in fibrosis formation [36,37]. Thus, TGF- β1 and ARG-1 could play key roles in directing the anti-inflammatory profile and chronic features presented in viable NCC.

Of the 38 genes evaluated, we found five–IL-1a, CSF-1, FN-1, COL-3A1, and MMP-2 –that were overexpressed in the contralateral tissue when compared to gene expression in non-infected tissue. These results revealed that brain tissue distant to viable T. solium cysts can be compromised and may help explain the possible mechanism of hippocampal atrophy found in NCC patients, chronic seizures are also thought to lead directly to hippocampal atrophy [38,39]. There is still debate whether hippocampal atrophy found in NCC cases is the result of an inflammatory process, changes in brain activity, or if it is due to the presence of the parasite itself. Furthermore, different studies support the notion that the cysticercus can stimulate brain responses at farther regions [40,41]. We recently reported on findings that show axonal swelling in the presence of NCC extends beyond regions showing inflammatory changes, suggesting there may be contribution by anterograde and retrograde transport in promoting hippocampal atrophy [11]. Additionally, molecular mechanisms known to promote hippocampal atrophy include inflammation and production of collagen proteins. We found overexpression of COL-3A1, which in hippocampal tissues has the ability to regulate network structure [42] and whose overexpression can result in neuronal loss [43]. This is the first report we are aware of that showed that changes in gene expression of inflammatory cytokines occur in brain tissue distant to the cyst, adding to the body of evidence supporting NCC’s role in hippocampal atrophy.

This study investigated the differential expression of 38 genes related to different molecular pathways in the setting of NCC. However, in order to understand the complexity of the pathways involved in NCC pathogenesis, further investigation with robust techniques such as high-throughput screening like RNAseq or proteomics is needed [44,45]. Here, we demonstrated that regions distant to the parasite, in this case the contralateral side of the brain, are affected and induce changes in gene expression. One limitation of this approach is that while gene expression is known to vary between brain hemispheres [46-48], we did not compare the gene profile between the left and right hemispheres. This decision was made due to the understanding that in NCC, cysts appear to be randomly oriented and predilection to one specific side has not been observed.

Finally, we can conclude that the viable cysticerci stage of NCC in the rat model is characterized by increased expression of genes associated with a proinflammatory response and fibrosis-related proteins, including collagen, TGF-β, and ARG-1, which together may mediate the chronic state of infection. These pathways appear to influence regions far from the cyst, providing a possible explanation for the emerging association between NCC and hippocampal atrophy.

Number of tissues used in this study.

Tissue close to the parasite (CP), contralateral tissue (CT) and non-infected tissue were collected (N) from different brain areas anterior (A), medium (M) and posterior (P). # Cysts refers to the number of cysts found in each rat and P cysts refers to the number of cysts located in the parenchymal tissue.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

Heatmap represents all genes evaluated in this study.

Gene responses in tissue close to the parasite (CP) form a cluster but also shared its expression with its contralateral tissue (CT). Some CT share the gene profile presented in non-infected tissue (N). Three different regions of the brain were used anterior (A), medial (M) and posterior (P). Bar represents log2 of fold change.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.

9 Jan 2020

Dear PhD Verastegui:

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Changes in inflammatory gene expression in brain tissue adjacent and distant to a viable cyst in a rat model for neurocysticercosis" (PNTD-D-19-01926) for review by PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. Your manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic but identified some aspects of the manuscript that should be improved.

We therefore ask you to modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations before we can consider your manuscript for acceptance. Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer.

In addition, when you are ready to resubmit, please be prepared to provide the following:

(1) A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

(2) Two versions of the manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed (uploaded as a "Revised Article with Changes Highlighted" file ); the other a clean version (uploaded as the article file).

(3) If available, a striking still image (a new image if one is available or an existing one from within your manuscript). If your manuscript is accepted for publication, this image may be featured on our website. Images should ideally be high resolution, eye-catching, single panel images; where one is available, please use 'add file' at the time of resubmission and select 'striking image' as the file type.

Please provide a short caption, including credits, uploaded as a separate "Other" file. If your image is from someone other than yourself, please ensure that the artist has read and agreed to the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License at http://journals.plos.org/plosntds/s/content-license (NOTE: we cannot publish copyrighted images).

(4) Appropriate Figure Files

Please remove all name and figure # text from your figure files upon submitting your revision. Please also take this time to check that your figures are of high resolution, which will improve both the editorial review process and help expedite your manuscript's publication should it be accepted. Please note that figures must have been originally created at 300dpi or higher. Do not manually increase the resolution of your files. For instructions on how to properly obtain high quality images, please review our Figure Guidelines, with examples at: http://journals.plos.org/plosntds/s/figures

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We hope to receive your revised manuscript by Mar 09 2020 11:59PM. If you anticipate any delay in its return, we ask that you let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

To submit your revised files, please log in to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pntd/

If you have any questions or concerns while you make these revisions, please let us know.

Sincerely,

Adly M.M. Abd-Alla, Prof asso.

Guest Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Mar Siles-Lucas

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: The objectives are well articulated with a clear testable hypothesis.

Study design appropriate.

Sample size is small, but the results striking and is an animal model.

Statistical anaylsis appropriate

Reviewer #2: I have no concerns regarding the methods of the study.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: Analysis plan is appropriate.The results are clearly presented.

Figures are sufficient.

Page 6 - the two lines 141-142 give the results and use symbols (*,#,etc) - I found this hard to follow.

Page 7- 159-161 - same comments applies to page 6.

Reviewer #2: I have no concerns with the results section.

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: The conclusions supported by the data supported and has important implications for the field of NCC. Hippocampal atrophy is an emerging field and more data is needed. The authors do a nice job of laying this out for the reader. The discussion of the results, which are very interesting, can help us understand pathogenesis hippocampal atrophy in the setting of NCC and the public health relevance is addressed.

The limitations is are addressed.

Reviewer #2: No concerns with the conclusions section.

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: Page 4 - line 73 - authors note that leading to a cascade of inflammatory responses that cause cyst degeneration - I pulled reference 6 and there is no discussion of inflammatory response.

Reviewer #2: Minor criticisms are as follows:

1. The sentence on lines 79-81 has a lot of commas and is confusing to read. I would separate into 2 sentences.

2. Line 231 – would add the phrase “in CT samples” to the end of the sentence, “As expected, fibrosis-related genes…..”

3. Line 246 – would change “NCC” to say “viable NCC” as the expected inflammatory profile would differ significantly in degenerating or calcified lesions.

4. Line 250-251, would add that chronic seizures are also thought to lead directly to hippocampal atrophy

5. Lines 257-259 – between “found” and “changes” would put the word that.

Or could change to “this is the first report… that showed that changes”

6. Line 261 – “in order understand” should be changed to “in order to understand”

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: The work presented is interesting. The hypothesis is based on clinical observations on the association of hippocampal atrophy in the setting of NCC. The authors set up a lovely experiment to begin to unravel pathogenesis. The results support that there is increased expression of inflammatory cytokines is over expressed in tissue close to the parasite - which is expected. But, genes for IL-1a, CSF-1, FN-1, COL-3A1, and MMP-2 were over expressed in contraleral tissue compared to non-infected tissue. This is quite novel and the results have clinical implications.

Reviewer #2: The paper by Carmen-Orozco et al discusses an extremely important topic, that of the role of inflammation in the pathophysiology of NCC. The authors are the first to demonstrate an upregulation of pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrosis genes on the contra-lateral side to a viable NCC lesion. This provides extremely important information regarding the possible mechanisms by which epilepsy can develop in NCC. Overall, the paper is well written and provides significant new information that will be very useful to those studying NCC and/or epilepsy.

I have a few chief questions for the authors:

1. Did any of the infected rats experience seizures during the study? Although seizures are more common with degenerating and calcified lesions, they can still occur with viable lesions and this could be an important confounder as seizures are also known to trigger inflammation.

2. Line 77 – stated that the study of viable lesions can “provide pivotal information about NCC etiology and its symptoms.” I would change etiology to pathophysiology, as we already know the etiology of NCC.

3. Methods section, line 100 – They state that for all infected rats, “the tissue surrounding the cyst was dissected and collected.” However, some of the rats had 2 cysts – for these rats, did they collect both cysts or just one? And if they collected only one, how did they chose between cysts? Also, did they do any analyses to compare those with 1 cyst to those with 2? Was there greater inflammation if there were 2 cysts?

4. Discussion, lines 235-237 – The authors state that, even though they did not find increased gene expression of angiogenesis, “it is evident that in the tissue surrounding the cyst, angiogenesis is present and expected.” How was this evident that angiogenesis was present? Was this seen on pathology?

5. Figure 4 – it is impossible, looking at the figure the way it is, to compare the groups. Would separate the CP, CT, and N groups into three separate parts of the figure so you can actually compare between the groups.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Christina coyle

Reviewer #2: No

23 Feb 2021

Submitted filename: letter to response editors.docx

Click here for additional data file.

7 Mar 2021

Dear PhD Verastegui,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Changes in inflammatory gene expression in brain tissue adjacent and distant to a viable cyst in a rat model for neurocysticercosis' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Adly M.M. Abd-Alla, Prof asso.

Associate Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Mar Siles-Lucas

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

22 Apr 2021

Dear PhD Verastegui,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Changes in inflammatory gene expression in brain tissue adjacent and distant to a viable cyst in a rat model for neurocysticercosis," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases