Caroline K Geiger1,2, Benjamin D Sommers3,4, Summer S Hawkins5, Jessica L Cohen6. 1. Interfaculty Initiative in Health Policy, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, California, USA. 3. Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4. Harvard Medical School/Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5. School of Social Work, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA. 6. Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between recent changes in Medicaid eligibility and preconception insurance coverage, pregnancy intention, health care use, and risk factors for poor birth outcomes among first-time parents. DATA SOURCE: This study used individual-level data from the national Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (2006-2017), which surveys individuals who recently gave birth in the United States on their experiences before, during, and after pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: Outcomes included preconception insurance status, pregnancy intention, stress from bills, early prenatal care, and diagnoses of high blood pressure and diabetes. Outcomes were regressed on an index measuring Medicaid generosity, which captures the fraction of female-identifying individuals who would be eligible for Medicaid based on state income eligibility thresholds, in each state and year. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: The sample included all individuals aged 20-44 with a first live birth in 2009-2017. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among all first-time parents, a 10-percentage point (ppt) increase in Medicaid generosity was associated with a 0.7 ppt increase (P = 0.017) in any insurance coverage and a 1.5 ppt increase (P < 0.001) in Medicaid coverage in the month before pregnancy. We also observed significant increases in insurance coverage and early prenatal care and declines in stress from bills and unintended pregnancies among individuals with a high-school degree or less. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing Medicaid generosity for childless adults has the potential to improve insurance coverage in the critical period before pregnancy and help improve maternal outcomes among first-time parents.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between recent changes in Medicaid eligibility and preconception insurance coverage, pregnancy intention, health care use, and risk factors for poor birth outcomes among first-time parents. DATA SOURCE: This study used individual-level data from the national Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (2006-2017), which surveys individuals who recently gave birth in the United States on their experiences before, during, and after pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: Outcomes included preconception insurance status, pregnancy intention, stress from bills, early prenatal care, and diagnoses of high blood pressure and diabetes. Outcomes were regressed on an index measuring Medicaid generosity, which captures the fraction of female-identifying individuals who would be eligible for Medicaid based on state income eligibility thresholds, in each state and year. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: The sample included all individuals aged 20-44 with a first live birth in 2009-2017. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among all first-time parents, a 10-percentage point (ppt) increase in Medicaid generosity was associated with a 0.7 ppt increase (P = 0.017) in any insurance coverage and a 1.5 ppt increase (P < 0.001) in Medicaid coverage in the month before pregnancy. We also observed significant increases in insurance coverage and early prenatal care and declines in stress from bills and unintended pregnancies among individuals with a high-school degree or less. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing Medicaid generosity for childless adults has the potential to improve insurance coverage in the critical period before pregnancy and help improve maternal outcomes among first-time parents.
Keywords:
Medicaid; maternal and perinatal care and outcomes; patient protection and affordable care act; preconception care; pregnancy; prenatal care; state health policies; unplanned
Authors: Claire E Margerison; Colleen L MacCallum; Jiajia Chen; Yasamean Zamani-Hank; Robert Kaestner Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Holly B Shulman; Denise V D'Angelo; Leslie Harrison; Ruben A Smith; Lee Warner Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-08-23 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Denise V D'Angelo; Brenda Le; Mary Elizabeth O'Neil; Letitia Williams; Indu B Ahluwalia; Leslie L Harrison; R Louise Floyd; Violanda Grigorescu Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2015-06-19
Authors: R Louise Floyd; Kay A Johnson; Jasmine R Owens; Sarah Verbiest; Cynthia A Moore; Coleen Boyle Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Michelle H Moniz; Matthias A Kirch; Erica Solway; Susan D Goold; John Z Ayanian; Edith C Kieffer; Sarah J Clark; Renuka Tipirneni; Jeffrey T Kullgren; Tammy Chang Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2018-08-03
Authors: Maria I Rodriguez; Ann Martinez Acevedo; Jonas J Swartz; Aaron B Caughey; Amy Valent; K John McConnell Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-04-01