Cheolwoon Woo1, Naomichi Yamamoto2,3. 1. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea. nyamamoto@snu.ac.kr. 3. Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea. nyamamoto@snu.ac.kr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bacteria emitted into the atmosphere eventually settle to the pedosphere via sedimentation (dry deposition) or precipitation (wet deposition), constituting a part of the global cycling of substances on Earth, including the water cycle. In this study, we aim to investigate the taxonomic compositions and flux densities of bacterial deposition, for which little is known regarding the relative contributions of each mode of atmospheric deposition, the taxonomic structures and memberships, and the aerodynamic properties in the atmosphere. RESULTS: Precipitation was found to dominate atmospheric bacterial deposition, contributing to 95% of the total flux density at our sampling site in Korea, while bacterial communities in precipitation were significantly different from those in sedimentation, in terms of both their structures and memberships. Large aerodynamic diameters of atmospheric bacteria were observed, with an annual mean of 8.84 μm, which appears to be related to their large sedimentation velocities, with an annual mean of 1.72 cm s- 1 for all bacterial taxa combined. The observed mean sedimentation velocity for atmospheric bacteria was larger than the previously reported mean sedimentation velocities for fungi and plants. CONCLUSIONS: Large aerodynamic diameters of atmospheric bacteria, which are likely due to the aggregation and/or attachment to other larger particles, are thought to contribute to large sedimentation velocities, high efficiencies as cloud nuclei, and large amounts of precipitation of atmospheric bacteria. Moreover, the different microbiotas between precipitation and sedimentation might indicate specific bacterial involvement and/or selective bacterial growth in clouds. Overall, our findings add novel insight into how bacteria participate in atmospheric processes and material circulations, including hydrological circulation, on Earth.
BACKGROUND: Bacteria emitted into the atmosphere eventually settle to the pedosphere via sedimentation (dry deposition) or precipitation (wet deposition), constituting a part of the global cycling of substances on Earth, including the water cycle. In this study, we aim to investigate the taxonomic compositions and flux densities of bacterial deposition, for which little is known regarding the relative contributions of each mode of atmospheric deposition, the taxonomic structures and memberships, and the aerodynamic properties in the atmosphere. RESULTS: Precipitation was found to dominate atmospheric bacterial deposition, contributing to 95% of the total flux density at our sampling site in Korea, while bacterial communities in precipitation were significantly different from those in sedimentation, in terms of both their structures and memberships. Large aerodynamic diameters of atmospheric bacteria were observed, with an annual mean of 8.84 μm, which appears to be related to their large sedimentation velocities, with an annual mean of 1.72 cm s- 1 for all bacterial taxa combined. The observed mean sedimentation velocity for atmospheric bacteria was larger than the previously reported mean sedimentation velocities for fungi and plants. CONCLUSIONS: Large aerodynamic diameters of atmospheric bacteria, which are likely due to the aggregation and/or attachment to other larger particles, are thought to contribute to large sedimentation velocities, high efficiencies as cloud nuclei, and large amounts of precipitation of atmospheric bacteria. Moreover, the different microbiotas between precipitation and sedimentation might indicate specific bacterial involvement and/or selective bacterial growth in clouds. Overall, our findings add novel insight into how bacteria participate in atmospheric processes and material circulations, including hydrological circulation, on Earth.
Authors: David J Smith; Daniel A Jaffe; Michele N Birmele; Dale W Griffin; Andrew C Schuerger; Jonathan Hee; Michael S Roberts Journal: Microb Ecol Date: 2012-07-04 Impact factor: 4.552
Authors: U Pöschl; S T Martin; B Sinha; Q Chen; S S Gunthe; J A Huffman; S Borrmann; D K Farmer; R M Garland; G Helas; J L Jimenez; S M King; A Manzi; E Mikhailov; T Pauliquevis; M D Petters; A J Prenni; P Roldin; D Rose; J Schneider; H Su; S R Zorn; P Artaxo; M O Andreae Journal: Science Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Robert M Bowers; Christian L Lauber; Christine Wiedinmyer; Micah Hamady; Anna G Hallar; Ray Fall; Rob Knight; Noah Fierer Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2009-06-05 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Shinichi Sunagawa; Luis Pedro Coelho; Samuel Chaffron; Jens Roat Kultima; Karine Labadie; Guillem Salazar; Bardya Djahanschiri; Georg Zeller; Daniel R Mende; Adriana Alberti; Francisco M Cornejo-Castillo; Paul I Costea; Corinne Cruaud; Francesco d'Ovidio; Stefan Engelen; Isabel Ferrera; Josep M Gasol; Lionel Guidi; Falk Hildebrand; Florian Kokoszka; Cyrille Lepoivre; Gipsi Lima-Mendez; Julie Poulain; Bonnie T Poulos; Marta Royo-Llonch; Hugo Sarmento; Sara Vieira-Silva; Céline Dimier; Marc Picheral; Sarah Searson; Stefanie Kandels-Lewis; Chris Bowler; Colomban de Vargas; Gabriel Gorsky; Nigel Grimsley; Pascal Hingamp; Daniele Iudicone; Olivier Jaillon; Fabrice Not; Hiroyuki Ogata; Stephane Pesant; Sabrina Speich; Lars Stemmann; Matthew B Sullivan; Jean Weissenbach; Patrick Wincker; Eric Karsenti; Jeroen Raes; Silvia G Acinas; Peer Bork Journal: Science Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: David J Smith; Hilkka J Timonen; Daniel A Jaffe; Dale W Griffin; Michele N Birmele; Kevin D Perry; Peter D Ward; Michael S Roberts Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2012-12-07 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo; Angela M Oliverio; Tess E Brewer; Alberto Benavent-González; David J Eldridge; Richard D Bardgett; Fernando T Maestre; Brajesh K Singh; Noah Fierer Journal: Science Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Cindy E Morris; David C Sands; Boris A Vinatzer; Catherine Glaux; Caroline Guilbaud; Alain Buffière; Shuangchun Yan; Hélène Dominguez; Brian M Thompson Journal: ISME J Date: 2008-01-10 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Elena S Gusareva; Enzo Acerbi; Kenny J X Lau; Irvan Luhung; Balakrishnan N V Premkrishnan; Sandra Kolundžija; Rikky W Purbojati; Anthony Wong; James N I Houghton; Dana Miller; Nicolas E Gaultier; Cassie E Heinle; Megan E Clare; Vineeth Kodengil Vettath; Carmon Kee; Serene B Y Lim; Caroline Chénard; Wen Jia Phung; Kavita K Kushwaha; Ang Poh Nee; Alexander Putra; Deepa Panicker; Koh Yanqing; Yap Zhei Hwee; Sachin R Lohar; Mikinori Kuwata; Hie Lim Kim; Liang Yang; Akira Uchida; Daniela I Drautz-Moses; Ana Carolina M Junqueira; Stephan C Schuster Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-10-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Tina Šantl-Temkiv; Pierre Amato; Emilio O Casamayor; Patrick K H Lee; Stephen B Pointing Journal: FEMS Microbiol Rev Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 15.177