Literature DB >> 33902675

Investigating the effects of substrate morphology and experimental conditions on the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass through modeling.

Jessica C Rohrbach1, Jeremy S Luterbacher2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding how the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass is affected by its morphology is essential to design efficient processes for biomass deconstruction. In this study, we used a model based on a set of partial differential equations describing the evolution of the substrate morphology to investigate the interplay between experimental conditions and the physical characteristics of biomass particles as the reaction proceeds. Our model carefully considers the overall quantity of cellulase present in the hydrolysis mixture and explores its interplay with the available accessible cellulose surface.
RESULTS: Exploring the effect of various experimental and structural parameters highlighted the significant role of internal mass transfer as the substrate size increases and/or the enzyme loading decreases. In such cases, diffusion of cellulases to the available cellulose surface limits the rate of glucose release. We notably see that increasing biomass loading, while keeping enzyme loading constant should be favored for both small- (R < 300 [Formula: see text]) and middle-ranged (300 < R < 1000 [Formula: see text]) substrates to enhance enzyme diffusion while minimizing the use of enzymes. In such cases, working at enzyme loadings exceeding the full coverage of the cellulose surface (i.e. eI>1) does not bring a significant benefit. For larger particles (R > 1000 [Formula: see text]), increases in biomass loading do not offset the significant internal mass transfer limitations, but high enzyme loadings improve enzyme penetration by maintaining a high concentration gradient within the particle. We also confirm the well-known importance of cellulose accessibility, which increases with pretreatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the developed model, we are able to propose several design criteria for deconstruction process. Importantly, we highlight the crucial role of adjusting the enzyme and biomass loading to the wood particle size and accessible cellulose surface to maintain a strong concentration gradient, while avoiding unnecessary excess in cellulase loading. Theory-based approaches that explicitly consider the entire lignocellulose particle structure can be used to clearly identify the relative importance of bottlenecks during the biomass deconstruction process, and serve as a framework to build on more detailed cellulase mechanisms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cellulase; Hydrolysis; Lignocellulosic biomass; Mass transfer; Modeling; Porosity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33902675     DOI: 10.1186/s13068-021-01920-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels        ISSN: 1754-6834            Impact factor:   6.040


  27 in total

1.  A model explaining declining rate in hydrolysis of lignocellulose substrates with cellobiohydrolase I (cel7A) and endoglucanase I (cel7B) of Trichoderma reesei.

Authors:  Torny Eriksson; Johan Karlsson; Folke Tjerneld
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.926

Review 2.  Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology.

Authors:  Lee R Lynd; Paul J Weimer; Willem H van Zyl; Isak S Pretorius
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 3.  A review of lignocellulose bioconversion using enzymatic hydrolysis and synergistic cooperation between enzymes--factors affecting enzymes, conversion and synergy.

Authors:  J S Van Dyk; B I Pletschke
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 14.227

4.  Feedstocks for lignocellulosic biofuels.

Authors:  Chris Somerville; Heather Youngs; Caroline Taylor; Sarah C Davis; Stephen P Long
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A mechanistic model of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose.

Authors:  Seth E Levine; Jerome M Fox; Harvey W Blanch; Douglas S Clark
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update.

Authors:  Lee R Lynd; Willem H van Zyl; John E McBride; Mark Laser
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 9.740

7.  Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production.

Authors:  Michael E Himmel; Shi-You Ding; David K Johnson; William S Adney; Mark R Nimlos; John W Brady; Thomas D Foust
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass to fuels and chemicals.

Authors:  Shishir P S Chundawat; Gregg T Beckham; Michael E Himmel; Bruce E Dale
Journal:  Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 11.059

9.  Inhibition of Trichoderma reesei cellulase by sugars and solvents.

Authors:  M Holtzapple; M Cognata; Y Shu; C Hendrickson
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Assessing the molecular structure basis for biomass recalcitrance during dilute acid and hydrothermal pretreatments.

Authors:  Yunqiao Pu; Fan Hu; Fang Huang; Brian H Davison; Arthur J Ragauskas
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 6.040

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.