Literature DB >> 33900588

A Predictive Approach to Infer the Activity and Natural Variation of Retrotransposon Families in Plants.

Matthias Benoit1, Hajk-Georg Drost2.   

Abstract

Plant genomes harbor a particularly rich landscape of repetitive sequences. Transposable elements (TEs) represent a major fraction of this diversity and are intimately linked with plasticity and evolution of genomes across the tree of life (Fedoroff, Science 338:758-767, 2012). Amplification of Long Terminal Repeats (LTR) retrotransposons have shaped the genomic landscape by reshuffling genomic regions, altering gene expression, and providing new regulatory sequences, some of which have been instrumental for crop domestication and breeding (Lisch, Nat Rev Genet 14:49-61, 2013; Vitte et al., Brief Funct Genomics 13:276-295, 2014). While many retrotransposon families are still active within plant genomes, the repetitive nature of retrotransposons has hindered accurate annotation and kingdom-wide predictive assessment of their activity and molecular evolution. While it is natural for the first approach towards a genome annotation to characterize all regions of the genome and associate them with known structures such as particular genes, transposable elements, or other types of non-coding regions, such efforts can result in a large proportion of false-positive annotations when seeking for active loci. To overcome this issue, the next round of annotation efforts needs to include functional annotations based on rigorously defined sequence structures and protein domain compositions. In the context of retrotransposons, such a functional annotation can enable efforts to mobilize particular retrotransposon families in species living today and harness their mutagenic potency for crop improvement (Paszkowski, Curr Opin Biotechnol 32:200-206, 2015). For this purpose, we present a predictive analytical approach to infer the activity and natural variation of retrotransposon families in plants. This is achieved by applying a combination of software and molecular biology tools we developed for functional annotation, activity monitoring, and the assessment of the population structure of particular retrotransposon families in multiple plant species.

Keywords:  Functional annotation; Molecular evolution; Natural variation; Predictive annotation; Retrotransposons; Transposable elements

Year:  2021        PMID: 33900588     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1134-0_1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  23 in total

Review 1.  A triptych of the evolution of plant transposable elements.

Authors:  Maud I Tenaillon; Jesse D Hollister; Brandon S Gaut
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 18.313

2.  Unexpected consequences of a sudden and massive transposon amplification on rice gene expression.

Authors:  Ken Naito; Feng Zhang; Takuji Tsukiyama; Hiroki Saito; C Nathan Hancock; Aaron O Richardson; Yutaka Okumoto; Takatoshi Tanisaka; Susan R Wessler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  An siRNA pathway prevents transgenerational retrotransposition in plants subjected to stress.

Authors:  Hidetaka Ito; Hervé Gaubert; Etienne Bucher; Marie Mirouze; Isabelle Vaillant; Jerzy Paszkowski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Controlled activation of retrotransposition for plant breeding.

Authors:  Jerzy Paszkowski
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 5.  LTR-retrotransposons in plants: Engines of evolution.

Authors:  Leonardo Galindo-González; Corinne Mhiri; Michael K Deyholos; Marie-Angèle Grandbastien
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.688

6.  Presidential address. Transposable elements, epigenetics, and genome evolution.

Authors:  Nina V Fedoroff
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  How important are transposons for plant evolution?

Authors:  Damon Lisch
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  The bright side of transposons in crop evolution.

Authors:  Clémentine Vitte; Margaux-Alison Fustier; Karine Alix; Maud I Tenaillon
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  Transposable elements: all mobile, all different, some stress responsive, some adaptive?

Authors:  Sophie Lanciano; Marie Mirouze
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 5.578

10.  Transposable elements contribute to activation of maize genes in response to abiotic stress.

Authors:  Irina Makarevitch; Amanda J Waters; Patrick T West; Michelle Stitzer; Candice N Hirsch; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra; Nathan M Springer
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reference-Guided De Novo Genome Assembly of the Flour Beetle Tribolium freemani.

Authors:  Marin Volarić; Evelin Despot-Slade; Damira Veseljak; Nevenka Meštrović; Brankica Mravinac
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 6.208

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.