Literature DB >> 33900567

Consumers' Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Personalised Nutrition.

Daniel Pérez-Troncoso1, David M Epstein2, José A Castañeda-García3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Personalised nutrition (PN) has great potential for disease prevention, particularly if coupled with the power and accessibility of mobile technology. However, success of PN interventions will depend on the willingness of users to subscribe. This study investigates the factors associated with potential users' perceived value of PN and heterogeneity in these values.
METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was carried out in a representative sample (N = 429 valid responses) from the adult population in Spain. The results were analysed in line with McFadden's Random Utility Theory, using conditional and mixed logit models in addition to a latent class logit model.
RESULTS: The conditional and mixed logit models revealed the existence of a significant preference and willingness to pay for personalised nutrition, but the effect on average was not large for the highest level of personalisation. The latent class logit revealed four classes of respondent: those who would be likely to pay for a high level of personalised nutrition service, those who would use it if it were heavily subsidised, those who would use only a basic nutrition service, and those who would not be willing to engage. These results could be useful for the design and targeting of effective personalised nutrition services.
CONCLUSIONS: Over half of adults currently perceive some individual benefit in a high level of PN, which may justify some degree of public subsidy in investment and delivery of such a service.

Year:  2021        PMID: 33900567     DOI: 10.1007/s40258-021-00647-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy        ISSN: 1175-5652            Impact factor:   2.561


  7 in total

1.  Public perceptions of personalised nutrition through the lens of Social Cognitive Theory.

Authors:  Audrey Rankin; Sharron Kuznesof; Lynn J Frewer; Karen Orr; Jenny Davison; Maria Dv de Almeida; Barbara Stewart-Knox
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2016-02-01

Review 2.  Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal.

Authors:  G W Torrance
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Food choice motives, attitude towards and intention to adopt personalised nutrition.

Authors:  Audrey Rankin; Brendan P Bunting; Rui Poínhos; Ivo A van der Lans; Arnout Rh Fischer; Sharron Kuznesof; Mdv Almeida; Jerko Markovina; Lynn J Frewer; Barbara J Stewart-Knox
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.022

4.  Support among U.S. adults for local and state policies to increase fruit and vegetable access.

Authors:  Jennifer L Foltz; Diane M Harris; Heidi M Blanck
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Chronically ill patients' preferences for a financial incentive in a lifestyle intervention. Results of a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Claudia Molema; Jorien Veldwijk; Wanda Wendel-Vos; Ardine de Wit; Ien van de Goor; Jantine Schuit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Personalised nutrition and health.

Authors:  Jose M Ordovas; Lynnette R Ferguson; E Shyong Tai; John C Mathers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-06-13

7.  Strategies for Healthy Eating Promotion and Behavioral Change Perceived as Effective by Nutrition Professionals: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Josiemer Mattei; Charmaine Alfonso
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2020-08-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.