| Literature DB >> 33899106 |
Haruki Nagashima1, Yuki Hayashi1, Yuki Sakamoto1, Kenshi Komatsu2, Hiroshi Tauchi1.
Abstract
Tritium is a low energy beta emitter and is discharged into the aquatic environment primarily in the form of tritiated water (HTO) from nuclear power plants or from nuclear fuel reprocessing plants. Although the biological effects of HTO exposures at significant doses or dose rates have been extensively studied, there are few reports concerning the biological effects of HTO exposures at very low dose rates. In the present study using a hyper-sensitive assay system, we investigated the dose rate effect of HTO on the induction of mutations. Confluent cell populations were exposed to HTO for a total dose of 0.2 Gy at dose rates between 4.9 mGy/day and 192 mGy/day by incubating cells in medium containing HTO. HTO-induced mutant frequencies and mutation spectra were then investigated. A significant inflection point for both the mutant frequency and mutation spectra was found between 11 mGy/day and 21.6 mGy/day. Mutation spectra analysis revealed that a mechanistic change in the nature of the mutation events occurred around 11 mGy/day. The present observations and published experimental results from oral administrations of HTO to mice suggest that a threshold dose-rate for HTO exposures might exist between 11 mGy/day and 21.6 mGy/day where the nature of the mutation events induced by HTO becomes similar to those seen in spontaneous events.Entities:
Keywords: low dose; mutations; tritium
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33899106 PMCID: PMC8273808 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrab022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Radiat Res ISSN: 0449-3060 Impact factor: 2.724
Fig. 1.(A) Clonogenic survival following HTO exposures at various dose-rates. (B) Dose-rate dependency of the induced mutant frequency on HTO levels. Each data point represents the mean ± SD obtained from at least three independent experiments. The statistical significance was analyzed with the Tukey–Kramer method.
Mutation spectrum analysis of 6-thioguanine-resistant mutants induced by HTO exposure.
| Dose rate (mGy/day) | Number of mutant clones analyzed | DXS1497 (Xp22.31)/DXS1048 (Xp11.22)/DXS1194 (Xq11.12)/DXS1465 (Xq21.33) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −/−/−/− | +/+/−/− | +/+/+/− | +/+/+/+ | −/+/−/− | −/+/+/− | −/+/+/+ | −/−/+/− | −/−/+/+ | +/−/−/− | |||
| Number of clones (%) | Number of clones (%) | Number of clones (%) | Number of clones (%) | Number of clones (%) | Number of clones (%) | Number of clones (%) | Number of clones (%) | Number of clones (%) | Number of clones (%) | |||
| 4.9 | Control | 40 | 33 (82.5) | 3 (7.5) | 1 (2.5) | 2 (5.0) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 0.2 Gy | 79 | 63 (79.7) | 5 (6.3) | 9 (11.4) | 1 (1.3) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| 6.24 | Control | 75 | 59 (78.7) | 5 (6.7) | 8 (10.7) | 1 (1.3) | 1 (1.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.3) | 1 (1.3) | 0 (0) |
| 0.2 Gy | 152 | 103 (67.8) | 7 (4.6) | 26 (17.1) | 12 (7.9) | 1 (0.7) | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0) | 2 (1.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| 8.64 | Control | 44 | 27 (61.4) | 5 (11.4) | 7 (15.9) | 4 (9.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 0.2 Gy | 99 | 64 (64.6) | 4 (4.0) | 19 (19.2) | 8 (8.1) | 0 (0) | 2 (2.0) | 0 (0) | 2 (2.0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| 11.0 | Control | 72 | 49 (68.1) | 7 (9.7) | 15 (20.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 0.2 Gy | 144 | 93 (64.6) | 7 (4.7) | 30 (20.8) | 10 (6.9) | 2 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| 21.6 | Control | 48 | 29 (60.4) | 3 (6.3) | 12 (25.0) | 4 (8.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 0.2 Gy | 127 | 71 (55.9) | 19 (15.0) | 21 (16.5) | 9 (7.1) | 2 (1.6) | 3 (2.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (1.6) | |
| 34.6 | Control | 98 | 52 (53.1) | 10 (10.2) | 29 (29.6) | 6 (6.1) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.0) | 0 (0) |
| 0.2 Gy | 183 | 81 (44.3) | 35 (19.1) | 49 (26.8) | 15 (8.2) | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.5) | |
| 192 | Control | 16 | 10 (62.5) | 2 (12.5) | 4 (25.0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 0.2 Gy | 48 | 18 (37.5) | 9 (18.8) | 14 (29.2) | 2 (4.2) | 0 (0) | 2 (4.2) | 1 (2.1) | 1 (2.1) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.1) | |
Fig. 2.Percentage of deletions of STS markers on the human X-chromosome in the ‘non-spontaneous-type’ 6-TG resistant mutants induced by HTO exposures. The deletion rate of STS markers in the clones excluding the all negative (−/−/−/−) type clones are shown. (A) DXS1497 (Xp22.31) deletion. (B) DXS1048 (Xp11.22) deletion. (C) DXS1194 (Xq11.12) deletion. (D) DXS1465 (Xq21.33) deletion. The p-vales obtained by a statistical analysis with Fisher’s exact test are shown.
Fig. 3.Mutation spectrum of 6-TG resistant mutants induced by HTO exposures. The mutation spectrum is classified by the existence or absence of the DXS1497/DXS1048/DXS1194/DXS1465 markers. The symbol ‘+’ indicates existence of the STS marker and the symbol ‘−’ indicates an absence of the STS marker. Mutants were classified into four categories on the basis of the minimum number of DSBs which would be required to generate the mutant: Spontaneous-type (−/−/−/−), One-DSB-type, Two-DSB-type and translocation-type. The number of clones analyzed at each dose-rate are shown in Table 1. The p-values for spontaneous-type vs radiation-type (one-DSB, two-DSBs and translocation) mutants between the control group and the 0.2 Gy group which were analyzed with Chi-square test are shown
Fig. 4.Culture period dependence of the percentage of radiation-type mutants. Mutations which could be generated by one DSB, two DSBs, or by more complicated damage (translocation) are defined as ‘radiation type.’ The solid line shows a fitted line of the 0.2 Gy irradiated group using the least squares method. The dotted line shows a fitted line for the spontaneous control group. Result from linear regression analysis are shown on the graph as a formula and correlation coefficient (R2) value.