| Literature DB >> 33897164 |
Rajesh Kumar Reddy Adapala1, G G Laxman Prabhu1, K N Sanman1, Durga Rao Yalla2, Ranjit Shetty1, P Venugopal2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is known to invoke both immunological and inflammatory responses. While the neutrophils mediate the tumor-induced inflammatory response, the lymphocytes bring about the various immunological events associated with it. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a simple indicator of this dual response. We investigated the association between preoperative NLR and histopathological prognostic variables of RCC intending to find out whether it can be of value as a red flag capable of alerting the clinician as to the biological character of the tumor under consideration.Entities:
Keywords: Clear-cell carcinoma; neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; radical/partial nephrectomy; renal cell carcinoma
Year: 2021 PMID: 33897164 PMCID: PMC8052900 DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_34_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Urol Ann ISSN: 0974-7796
Clinicopathological characteristics of the study participants (n=60)
| Characteristics | Mean values and proportions |
|---|---|
| Age (years), mean±SD | 57±13 |
| Gender, | |
| Male | 49 (82) |
| Female | 11 (18) |
| Neutrophils, mean±SD | 63±11 |
| Lymphocytes, mean±SD | 26±10 |
| NLR, mean±SE | 3.1±0.26 |
| Tumor size (cm), mean±SD | 6.08±3 |
| Small (<4) versus large (>4) renal mass, | 18 (30):42 (70) |
| Stage, | |
| 1 | 27 (45) |
| 2 | 10 (16.6) |
| 3 | 9 (15) |
| 4 | 14 (23.4) |
| Histological type, | |
| Clear cell versus nonclear-cell carcinomas | 51 (85):9 (15) |
| Nuclear grading (only for clear-cell carcinomas), | |
| Low:high | 40 (78.5):11 (21.5) |
| Lymphovascular invasion (+/−) | 12 (20):48 (80) |
| Capsular invasion (+/−) | 23 (38.3):37 (61.7) |
| Renal sinus involvement (+/−) | 10 (16.6):50 (83.4) |
| Tumor necrosis (+/−) | 23 (38.3):37 (61.7) |
| Sarcomatoid differentiation (+/−) | 4 (6.7):56 (93.3) |
Descriptive statistics expressed as numbers, proportions and percentages. NLR: Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, +: Presence, −: Absence, SD: Standard deviation, SE: Standard error
Figure 1Preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio trend in various pathological stages
Figure 2Preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in various pathological prognostic features (presence vs. absence)
Variation in preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio across various clinicopathological categories
| Characteristics | NLR (mean±SEM) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tumor size (cm) | ||
| Small renal mass (<4) | 2.63±0.47 | 0.12 |
| Large renal mass (>4) | 3.3±0.32 | |
| Stage€ | ||
| 1 | 2.41±0.39 | 0.01*,# |
| 2 | 2.91±0.43 | |
| 3 | 3.21±0.70 | |
| 4 | 4.48±2.08 | |
| Histological type$ | ||
| Clear-cell carcinomas | 3.25±0.29 | 0.03* |
| Nonclear-cell carcinomas | 2.25±0.63 | |
| Nuclear grading (only for clear-cell carcinomas) | ||
| High | 3.06±0.34 | 0.90 |
| Low | 2.86±0.5 | |
| Lymphovascular invasion£ | ||
| Present | 3.8±0.67 | 0.19 |
| Absent | 2.92±0.29 | |
| Capsule£ | ||
| Involved | 3.96±0.45 | 0.004* |
| Intact | 2.56±0.3 | |
| Renal sinus involvement£ | ||
| Positive | 3.77±0.58 | 0.24 |
| Negative | 2.96±0.30 | |
| Tumor necrosis | ||
| Present | 3.44±0.44 | 0.32 |
| Absent | 2.88±0.33 | |
| Sarcomatoid differentiation | ||
| Present | 5±1.12 | 0.05 |
| Absent | 2.96±0.27 |
€ANOVA, post hoc by Tukey’s test Significance was observed between stages 1 versus 3* and 1 versus 4# $Compared using independent t-test £Other groups were compared by Mann-Whitney U-test. NLR: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, SEM: Standard error of the mean
Graph 1Correlation of preoperative neutrophil-to- lymphocyte ratio with the size of the tumor